Page 1 of 1
Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 7:20 pm
by S.I.C. GM
I know the guy is old, but we need a back up PG. He did a decent job last year. Ager is not doing anything.
Did u see the other in garbage time? CDR was running the point.
Imagine Armstrong and Dooling on a defensive squad. They would give PG and SG fits. Until they post them up.
Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 10:53 pm
by NetsForce
Why not waive Ager and sign me?
Why not waive Ager match the Krstic signing and try and force the Thunder into a sign and trade? (Even if it's just for the right to swap second round picks in the future)
Why not waive Ager... And be thankful that he's gone?
I don't know S.I.C... Down with Ager. That's all I have to say.
Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:43 am
by pistons_in_6
armstrong > ager
after he hit the side of the backboard in that preseason game against the heat i have been laughing at him.

Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:00 pm
by Chris Morris
Probably because Darrell Armstrong retired.
Let's cut Ager and sign John Stockton.
Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:57 pm
by Serpo
Well because the third PG wouldn't play much at all anyways unless ( god forbid ) a serious injury happens to Dooling or Harris . A small amount of Games can be handled with one of the two out and there's just no need to waste money with waiving Ager and his guaranteed money .
A trade would be nice to free up that roster space but who in the world wants that guy and the Nets aren't wasting an asset ( 2nd rounder etc ) just to get rid of him.
Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:55 pm
by jerseyjac
I just think the Nets are fine w. letting Ager dress up in suits for rest of the season, unless we find a a taker in a unlikely trade scenario...
just to keep in mind, on January 5th...10-day contracts can be signed...dont be surprised if we take advantage of this w. another pg...
Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:44 pm
by S.I.C. GM
Chris Morris wrote:Probably because Darrell Armstrong retired.
Let's cut Ager and sign John Stockton.
What a stupid remark!
According to your logic, the Celtics should have gotten Karl Malone instead PJ Brown last year.