ImageImageImageImageImage

Webster

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

Webster 

Post#1 » by Da big3 » Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:58 am

Webster Likely Out For Remainder Of Season wiretap, Thorn is just pure briallnce and a good luck charm...
Jersey Generals
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,447
And1: 414
Joined: May 19, 2008

Re: Webster 

Post#2 » by Jersey Generals » Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:39 am

Webster was part of the proposed trade?
User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

Re: Webster 

Post#3 » by Da big3 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:12 pm

Jersey Generals wrote:Webster was part of the proposed trade?


my bad, confused Webster with Outlaw, on the other side this what PortLand gets for tryin lowball us and everyone else...
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,911
And1: 1,577
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Webster 

Post#4 » by ecuhus1981 » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:22 pm

^

Yeah, I was the poster on these boards who wanted Martell. I still do, but he wouldn't have done us any good this year, and I think GMs could sense that, which is why Portland didn't make a deadline deal.

I wanted to trade VC for Raef, Martell AND Batum, to ensure that we at least some immediate impact. I figured that for the long-term, CDR and Nicolas would make a great lanky duo off the bench, and Martell plus a free agent in 2010 would be a good complementary starting wing duo.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Webster 

Post#5 » by jeff1624 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:29 am

I still sense nobody traded with portland because of the way they handled the Darius Miles situation. Where the hell do they get off threathening other teams.

Sucks for them, because Raef's contract was the biggest asset this year...
Dat Leadership
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,911
And1: 1,577
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Webster 

Post#6 » by ecuhus1981 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:33 pm

^

True, I didn't think about that...
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
RMoreau35
Freshman
Posts: 56
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 13, 2008
Location: Portland, Or.

Re: Webster 

Post#7 » by RMoreau35 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:09 am

I still sense nobody traded with portland because of the way they handled the Darius Miles situation. Where the hell do they get off threathening other teams.


That makes no sense whatsoever... it doesn't matter whos offering the deal... if the deal is beneficial to your team and goes with what you want than you make the deal... Thorn didn't say well I want to make this deal but the way Pritchard handled the D-Miles situation makes me have second thoughts... thats just ridiculous thinking
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Webster 

Post#8 » by jeff1624 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:36 am

Actually I'm pretty sure teams thought about it twice when dealing with portland. Who wouldn't want Lafrentz's contract?? What other reasons are there for NO team trading with portland??
Dat Leadership
RMoreau35
Freshman
Posts: 56
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 13, 2008
Location: Portland, Or.

Re: Webster 

Post#9 » by RMoreau35 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:42 am

Actually I'm pretty sure teams thought about it twice when dealing with portland. Who wouldn't want Lafrentz's contract?? What other reasons are there for NO team trading with portland??


It was Portland who declined the trades by most accounts because the teams Portland was dealing with wanted Bayless or Batum who they did not want to trade away
Preludepunk27
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,650
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Webster 

Post#10 » by Preludepunk27 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:03 am

RMoreau35 wrote:
Actually I'm pretty sure teams thought about it twice when dealing with portland. Who wouldn't want Lafrentz's contract?? What other reasons are there for NO team trading with portland??


It was Portland who declined the trades by most accounts because the teams Portland was dealing with wanted Bayless or Batum who they did not want to trade away


This makes me assumptions of Chad Ford's source that came out today even more possible for what I thought. We weren't begging Portland to take Vince. We just wanted a guy on their team badly. Likely Rudy or Bayless or Batum. Our management totally KNOWS we won't keep all 5 picks. If they had a guy we felt would be "part of our future" we'd throw any amount of picks at them along with Vince. If we "were trying to move Vince so badly," honestly we could have...easily too. I'm sick of one sided rumors, but that's how most rumors are.
Image

Return to Brooklyn Nets