Page 1 of 3
any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 4, 2009 1:23 pm
by shagadelic45
NJ TRADES: Bobby Simmons, Trenton Hassell
LAC TADES: Zach Randolph + Sweetener
SWEETENERS: Eric Gordon, Al Thorton, #3, trading Vince Carter for Tracy McGrady in a 3-way
NJ gets a low post threat is been lacking and the clips shave a year of salary
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 4, 2009 2:55 pm
by S.I.C. GM
If Gordon is the sweetener, i would take a chance.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 4, 2009 3:14 pm
by shagadelic45
gordon or thorton or #3...........take your pick?
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 4, 2009 7:53 pm
by NetsForce
Over my dead body. Say no to Cancerdolph.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 4, 2009 9:24 pm
by Rich Rane
I'd love to get rid of Hassell and Simmons, but taking back Randolph is like stabbing someone and getting stabbed in the stomach at the same time.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 4, 2009 11:24 pm
by shagadelic45
SWEETENERS: Eric Gordon, Al Thorton, #3, trading Vince Carter for Tracy McGrady in a 3-way
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sun Apr 5, 2009 12:57 am
by vincecarter4pres
I would absolutley take Randolph for expirings if the sweetner was Gordon or the #3 overall.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sun Apr 5, 2009 3:37 am
by dunleavyjr
Eddy Curry can potentially be Net's missing piece. Guy is big, strong. He can score against
any big man in the low post.
Ok, I admit, Curry is a poor rebounder. He doesn't impress anyone in the shotblocking department.
But then again, he is big, strong.
Nets need to play inside-out-game game.
That being said: Yi for Curry. Trade accepted.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sun Apr 5, 2009 12:58 pm
by shagadelic45
Randolph is WAY better than Curry
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sun Apr 5, 2009 1:41 pm
by S.I.C. GM
vincecarter4pres wrote:I would absolutley take Randolph for expirings if the sweetner was Gordon or the #3 overall.
I am definitely with you VC4pres. Either of those works for me. Getting Randolph would be well worth either.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:52 am
by deviljets7
As much as I despise Randolph, if the Clips are truly crazy enough to deal Gordon or pick #3 just to get out of that deal, you do it in a heartbeat. I don't even care if Randolph bothers to show up or prefers to spend the next 2 years in strip clubs
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Thu Apr 9, 2009 10:31 pm
by RoyalT23
vincecarter4pres wrote:I would absolutley take Randolph for expirings if the sweetner was Gordon or the #3 overall.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:35 am
by SeabassP
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:57 am
by halfHAVOC
dudes a ball stopper, doesn't play D,
hell no.
id rather take someone who lacks offensively but atleast hustles on defense like josh boone.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:20 pm
by shagadelic45
any preference to gordon or a lottery pick?
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:33 pm
by NetsForce
It would depend where that lottery pick was... Though I still might prefer Gordon. If you were trading for Randolph you'd basically have to start him, so instead of potentially getting Randolph (who's a cancer) and potentially a bust (if you make a bad draft pick), I'd just feel safer getting Randolph (who's a cancer) and a solid young player (Eric Gordon).
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:05 pm
by SeabassP
NetsForce wrote:It would depend where that lottery pick was... Though I still might prefer Gordon. If you were trading for Randolph you'd basically have to start him, so instead of potentially getting Randolph (who's a cancer) and potentially a bust (if you make a bad draft pick), I'd just feel safer getting Randolph (who's a cancer) and a solid young player (Eric Gordon).
Why does everyone think that the Clippers will be willing to trade Eric Gordon? I mean, I know they are the Clippers, but still...
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:48 am
by vincecarter4pres
SeabassP wrote:NetsForce wrote:It would depend where that lottery pick was... Though I still might prefer Gordon. If you were trading for Randolph you'd basically have to start him, so instead of potentially getting Randolph (who's a cancer) and potentially a bust (if you make a bad draft pick), I'd just feel safer getting Randolph (who's a cancer) and a solid young player (Eric Gordon).
Why does everyone think that the Clippers will be willing to trade Eric Gordon? I mean, I know they are the Clippers, but still...
I don't think or at least I hope that most of us don't take this proposal too seriously, but the Clips would have to include something of interest for a team to take him for expirings.
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:56 am
by SeabassP
vincecarter4pres wrote:SeabassP wrote:NetsForce wrote:It would depend where that lottery pick was... Though I still might prefer Gordon. If you were trading for Randolph you'd basically have to start him, so instead of potentially getting Randolph (who's a cancer) and potentially a bust (if you make a bad draft pick), I'd just feel safer getting Randolph (who's a cancer) and a solid young player (Eric Gordon).
Why does everyone think that the Clippers will be willing to trade Eric Gordon? I mean, I know they are the Clippers, but still...
I don't think or at least I hope that most of us don't take this proposal too seriously, but the Clips would have to include something of interest for a team to take him for expirings.
Oh I understand that, and I guess what I was saying is that people shouldn't be taking it too seriously...they aren't going to let go of Gordon
Re: any interest in Zach Randolph?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:42 pm
by shagadelic45
gordon would be harder to swallow, but doable....a top 10 lotto pick for sure