Bruce Bowen(plan for 2009 and 2010)
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:17 am
Everyone knows we will try to get an upgrade on the SF position, and that our biggest needs are defense and rebounding. At the same time, the Spurs arent looking that great against the Mavs(they are still playing while i post this) and word is that the former NBA champs will consider trading some of its older winning pieces(not named Duncan,Parker, or Ginobili). So, i thought about a trade that would help both teams:
NJN get: Bruce Bowen and Kurt Thomas
SAN get: Trenton Hassel(assuming he wont opt out), Sean Williams, Eduardo Najera, and our 11th pick.
Why for the Nets?: Besides improving our "D", with Bowen, we would get a very good center in K.Thomas to back Brook Lopez up, and add rebounding(he´s avg. 5 rbds in 17 min), and he has a solid mid-range shot that we could use.We also would get rid of players with contracts that will go through the 2010 season in Najera and Williams(Bowen and Thomas are both expiring contracts next season). Some may complain about the draft pick, but this year´s draft is weak and i think we could ask for San Antonio´s first next year(lottery protected), which should be very strong.(we would have 3 picks in 2010 draft and if we dont want to use all of them, we could trade up).
Why for the Spurs?: They get young assets in Williams(also a shot-blocking) and a lottery pick, which they really need, once they dont have many good young players and they are starting to get concerned about that. Second, they continue to be contenders( i do believe the 3 players we are giving them in this deal would fit well there). So, they dont break their core up, get younger, and continue to be competitive.
Then, what are your thoughts?
NJN get: Bruce Bowen and Kurt Thomas
SAN get: Trenton Hassel(assuming he wont opt out), Sean Williams, Eduardo Najera, and our 11th pick.
Why for the Nets?: Besides improving our "D", with Bowen, we would get a very good center in K.Thomas to back Brook Lopez up, and add rebounding(he´s avg. 5 rbds in 17 min), and he has a solid mid-range shot that we could use.We also would get rid of players with contracts that will go through the 2010 season in Najera and Williams(Bowen and Thomas are both expiring contracts next season). Some may complain about the draft pick, but this year´s draft is weak and i think we could ask for San Antonio´s first next year(lottery protected), which should be very strong.(we would have 3 picks in 2010 draft and if we dont want to use all of them, we could trade up).
Why for the Spurs?: They get young assets in Williams(also a shot-blocking) and a lottery pick, which they really need, once they dont have many good young players and they are starting to get concerned about that. Second, they continue to be contenders( i do believe the 3 players we are giving them in this deal would fit well there). So, they dont break their core up, get younger, and continue to be competitive.
Then, what are your thoughts?