ImageImageImageImageImage

Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#1 » by NetsForce » Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:37 am

Nets Trade:
- Rafer Alston
- Jarvis Hayes
- Josh Boone
- Eduardo Najera

Heat Trade:
- Quentin Richardson
- James Jones
- Chris Quinn

Boston Trade:
- Brian Scalabrine
- Tony Allen
- J.R. Giddens

---

Nets Receive:
- Quentin Richardson
- Chris Quinn
- Brian Scalabrine
- J.R. Giddens

Heat Receive:
- Rafer Alston
- Josh Boone
- Eduardo Najera
- Tony Allen

Boston Receive:
- Jarvis Hayes
- James Jones

---

Nets Explanation:
- Though they take on more salary this year...
- They get out of Najera's 2010 salary

Heat Explanation:
- Lower salary (by $1.2 million or so)
- Jettisoning James Jones virtually neutralizes the effect of Eduardo Najera's 2010 salary
- They bolster the PG and PF/C positions.

Boston Explanation:
- Lower salary (by $500,000 or so)
- Add legitimate wing depth at minimal cost...

---

In all honesty I'd prefer the Celtics not add Giddens to this deal (because there's no playing time available for him on the Nets), however... if the Celtics keep him they take on roughly $500,000 x 2 (luxury tax) in salary... I also figured that with the addition of James Jones AND Jarvis Hayes Giddens would be redundant anyway...

Maybe a team like Minnesota would take on Giddens for Chucky Atkins? The difference in Giddens salary and the guaranteed portion of Chucky Atkins' contract is only about $300,000 or so which doesn't seem like too absurd of a price for a C level prospect.

---
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#2 » by vincecarter4pres » Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:56 pm

I must say, this is pretty creative for what on the surface could look like lateral moves.
At first glance I thought there was no way Miami would do this, but then I realized they send out James Jones.
I hate losing Jarvis, but we have a lot of depth at the wings and could use all the cap space we could get, the only thing is I don't know that Riley does anything at all to help us get more of that precious asset ourselves, even if he improves his team and stays cap nuetral.
I still think something centered around Alston/Boone for Haslem works well for both sides, but this one is interesting for all parties for sure.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#3 » by NetsForce » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:50 pm

I guess the only thing is that even after this trade there would still be a bit of a glut at the wing position:

Nets Depth Chart After Trade:
Devin Harris / Keyon Dooling / Chris Quinn
Courtney Lee / Chris Douglas-Roberts / Terrence Williams / J.R. Giddens
Quentin Richardson / Bobby Simmons / Trenton Hassell
Yi Jianlian / Sean Williams / Brian Scalabrine
Brook Lopez / Tony Battie

*Giddens would be the Nets new Maurice Ager so is position on the depth chart is irrelevant.
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,552
And1: 14,845
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#4 » by Qwigglez » Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:49 pm

Q-Rich came to the Heat because Wade wants him there. They aren't trading him.
User avatar
range
Ballboy
Posts: 11
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 03, 2009

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#5 » by range » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:59 am

QR already moved down to the 305 -- don't think he's going anywhere. Like previously stated, interesting proposal though...
User avatar
jerseyjac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,956
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 01, 2001

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#6 » by jerseyjac » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:40 pm

Qrich on the right team in a good system can be a deadly player...you saw it with the Knicks or even the Suns....personally I think he needs less freedom on the court and he would put up more consistent numbers...he's a good fit for the Heat where he'll be in a better system and I would take him in the trade above for the reasons stated...but I dont think he's going anywhere...
Rockice_8
Banned User
Posts: 1,673
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#7 » by Rockice_8 » Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:57 pm

Interesting idea but I'd pass. I think we are fine just the way we are. Whats another million on the cap space gonna do for us. We have a young team and Najara is a good mentor. You think we are really gonna go out and spend all this money next year. Not gonna happen so that extra million we save dumping Najara is pointless.
User avatar
fishtheman04
Sophomore
Posts: 180
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2009

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#8 » by fishtheman04 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:35 am

imagine if we did do that trade, that would be like the 5th time that q-rich got traded this offseason
ib4
Sophomore
Posts: 150
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 22, 2008
Location: Dallas / Los Angeles

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#9 » by ib4 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:24 pm

couldn't we just buy out Qrich after this trade if he really wants to play in MIA?
wwtsm
Banned User
Posts: 2,050
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 19, 2005

Re: Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR 

Post#10 » by wwtsm » Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:59 am

Hayes and Alston are both better than QRich.

Return to Brooklyn Nets