Trade Idea: Q-RICH IS OUR SAVIOR
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:37 am
Nets Trade:
- Rafer Alston
- Jarvis Hayes
- Josh Boone
- Eduardo Najera
Heat Trade:
- Quentin Richardson
- James Jones
- Chris Quinn
Boston Trade:
- Brian Scalabrine
- Tony Allen
- J.R. Giddens
---
Nets Receive:
- Quentin Richardson
- Chris Quinn
- Brian Scalabrine
- J.R. Giddens
Heat Receive:
- Rafer Alston
- Josh Boone
- Eduardo Najera
- Tony Allen
Boston Receive:
- Jarvis Hayes
- James Jones
---
Nets Explanation:
- Though they take on more salary this year...
- They get out of Najera's 2010 salary
Heat Explanation:
- Lower salary (by $1.2 million or so)
- Jettisoning James Jones virtually neutralizes the effect of Eduardo Najera's 2010 salary
- They bolster the PG and PF/C positions.
Boston Explanation:
- Lower salary (by $500,000 or so)
- Add legitimate wing depth at minimal cost...
---
In all honesty I'd prefer the Celtics not add Giddens to this deal (because there's no playing time available for him on the Nets), however... if the Celtics keep him they take on roughly $500,000 x 2 (luxury tax) in salary... I also figured that with the addition of James Jones AND Jarvis Hayes Giddens would be redundant anyway...
Maybe a team like Minnesota would take on Giddens for Chucky Atkins? The difference in Giddens salary and the guaranteed portion of Chucky Atkins' contract is only about $300,000 or so which doesn't seem like too absurd of a price for a C level prospect.
---
- Rafer Alston
- Jarvis Hayes
- Josh Boone
- Eduardo Najera
Heat Trade:
- Quentin Richardson
- James Jones
- Chris Quinn
Boston Trade:
- Brian Scalabrine
- Tony Allen
- J.R. Giddens
---
Nets Receive:
- Quentin Richardson
- Chris Quinn
- Brian Scalabrine
- J.R. Giddens
Heat Receive:
- Rafer Alston
- Josh Boone
- Eduardo Najera
- Tony Allen
Boston Receive:
- Jarvis Hayes
- James Jones
---
Nets Explanation:
- Though they take on more salary this year...
- They get out of Najera's 2010 salary
Heat Explanation:
- Lower salary (by $1.2 million or so)
- Jettisoning James Jones virtually neutralizes the effect of Eduardo Najera's 2010 salary
- They bolster the PG and PF/C positions.
Boston Explanation:
- Lower salary (by $500,000 or so)
- Add legitimate wing depth at minimal cost...
---
In all honesty I'd prefer the Celtics not add Giddens to this deal (because there's no playing time available for him on the Nets), however... if the Celtics keep him they take on roughly $500,000 x 2 (luxury tax) in salary... I also figured that with the addition of James Jones AND Jarvis Hayes Giddens would be redundant anyway...
Maybe a team like Minnesota would take on Giddens for Chucky Atkins? The difference in Giddens salary and the guaranteed portion of Chucky Atkins' contract is only about $300,000 or so which doesn't seem like too absurd of a price for a C level prospect.
---