ImageImageImage

Sundin adament: He wants to remain a Leaf

Moderator: Crowned

dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,279
And1: 14,299
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Sundin adament: He wants to remain a Leaf 

Post#1 » by dagger » Mon Apr 9, 2007 7:22 pm

2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Crowned
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 4,491
And1: 155
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Toronto

 

Post#2 » by Crowned » Mon Apr 9, 2007 7:27 pm

If he wants to remain a Leaf, he better take a paycut. This team needs all the cap room they can get.
User avatar
The-Insider
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,674
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 22, 2005

 

Post#3 » by The-Insider » Mon Apr 9, 2007 7:35 pm

Exactly Crowned, I'm sure the Leafs would love to have him back but at what price? This team needs all the extra money possible to play with, if Mats is willing and able to take a paycut so the Leafs can possible sign him a winger to play with then it's fine. I still believe we can get it done with Matts, it's clear now that the Leafs cannot soley rely on him to carry them, he needs help.
Image
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 30,555
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

 

Post#4 » by whysoserious » Mon Apr 9, 2007 7:39 pm

On the Fan 590, Ferguson said they're looking at a multi-year deal. My feeling is if comes back for two year's at say 4 million a year tops, I can live with it. Knowing the way this organization is run though, I expect a 4 year deal worth something like 20 million or even more.
User avatar
Hustle&Flow
Starter
Posts: 2,116
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 18, 2006
Location: GTA

 

Post#5 » by Hustle&Flow » Mon Apr 9, 2007 11:12 pm

Sundin should retire a Leaf. His number should be retired. I cannot believe how he sacrificed his whole career here without complaining.
NeverGoingToWin
Veteran
Posts: 2,901
And1: 14
Joined: Aug 02, 2005

 

Post#6 » by NeverGoingToWin » Mon Apr 9, 2007 11:22 pm

He made a ton of money and I do not think he sacrificed anything to be here. I hate retiring numbers and love the fact that the Leafs only retire them if something tragic happens.
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 30,555
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

 

Post#7 » by whysoserious » Mon Apr 9, 2007 11:23 pm

Hustle&Flow wrote:Sundin should retire a Leaf. His number should be retired. I cannot believe how he sacrificed his whole career here without complaining.


This is true to a certain extent. I believe he's done everything within his power to carry this team, especially during their runs in the late 90's early 2000's. The problem is he never truly had the talent he should have had to play with him.

I think he should be remembered as one of the greatest Leafs, sadly, he won't be because Leaf fans would prefer to cheer on Doug Gilmour and Wendel Clark types. Don't get me wrong, both were very good players and key players for the Leafs. Sundin was more talented than either of them.

As for retiring a Leaf, I'd like to see it but not with the way this organization has been run. I'll give you and example - Detroit. They had an aging Yzerman, but they could afford to keep him around at a reasonable contract because they had Zetterberg and Datsyuk coming up behing him, slowly ready to take over. The Leafs do not have such player's at this time and thus a business and hockey decision must be made.
AOC
Junior
Posts: 470
And1: 8
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

 

Post#8 » by AOC » Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:02 am

vc_dunkchamp wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



This is true to a certain extent. I believe he's done everything within his power to carry this team, especially during their runs in the late 90's early 2000's. The problem is he never truly had the talent he should have had to play with him.

I think he should be remembered as one of the greatest Leafs, sadly, he won't be because Leaf fans would prefer to cheer on Doug Gilmour and Wendel Clark types. Don't get me wrong, both were very good players and key players for the Leafs. Sundin was more talented than either of them.

As for retiring a Leaf, I'd like to see it but not with the way this organization has been run. I'll give you and example - Detroit. They had an aging Yzerman, but they could afford to keep him around at a reasonable contract because they had Zetterberg and Datsyuk coming up behing him, slowly ready to take over. The Leafs do not have such player's at this time and thus a business and hockey decision must be made.


Clark, yes. Gilmour, no. The only thing is that Gilmour wasn't here long enough. I still think Sundin will be remembered as one of the greatest Leafs. He will soon hold the Leafs all time scoring records.

I agree that the Leafs have done a pretty bad job building a contender, but I think some onus falls on Sundin as well. He has never really had that huge defining playoff performance.

If they want to keep Sundin, then I hope it's for something low like $1 million. I know it's wishful thinking but he's made so much money over his career it's not even funny. If he signs for $4-5 million, then it's pretty much pointless since they won't be able to put together as good a team with the cap space.
User avatar
Garbage2Hero
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 79
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 05, 2007

 

Post#9 » by Garbage2Hero » Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:42 am

If they do sign him, it needs to be for a low amount;1.5-2 million. If he wants more than trade tucker. tuckers nothing but a camper beside the net waiting for the puck..A job Andy Wozniewski can do
User avatar
pspot
General Manager
Posts: 9,850
And1: 283
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
       

 

Post#10 » by pspot » Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:32 pm

I wish he would be adamant that he wants to win a Cup

this team is going no where fast
User avatar
hsb
RealGM
Posts: 18,678
And1: 15,859
Joined: Nov 19, 2006
       

 

Post#11 » by hsb » Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:00 pm

sundin is kinda like the KG of hockey

carries the team, the only time some talent was around him the team went far in the playoffs

he should be traded to a contender, both sides can start fresh
"I definitely knew he traveled, but I didn't know they were going to call it. That was one of them situations in which a great player made a move...and they called the call. And I was like, 'Oh, man, there is a God.'
User avatar
Andrea>Dirk
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,262
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2007

 

Post#12 » by Andrea>Dirk » Tue Apr 10, 2007 11:26 pm

If he wants to so bad, help us out and take a paycut like Crowned said.
Image
User avatar
Yosemite Dan
RealGM
Posts: 11,431
And1: 7,893
Joined: Nov 16, 2006

 

Post#13 » by Yosemite Dan » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:58 am

Sundin is slated to earn just under 5 million next year with the option but his contract will go against the cap for 6.3 million (don't know why but it's true, something must have been deferred)

Which means Sundin will be signing for something in between like 5.5 million. This way he gets more money and the Leafs take less of a cap hit. Knowing JFJ and his shrewd negotiating skills, it will be a 3 year deal closer to 6 million (because of course he deserves more money than McCabe, but then again doesn't everyone) and of course a now traditional no trade clause thrown in for good measure.
User avatar
Elevatorman
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,928
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2004
Location: Forrest City

 

Post#14 » by Elevatorman » Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:43 pm

Hustle&Flow wrote:Sundin should retire a Leaf. His number should be retired. I cannot believe how he sacrificed his whole career here without complaining.


sacrificed his entire career by getting paid tons of money and then never delivering a chip...yeah way to go mats...although i do like mats...if he wants to reamin a leaf bhe better be willing to take 2 million a year...thats all i would give him thats max...2 years....other then that not worth holdign the rest of the team down from getting fgood free agents
"It's like saying, 'Magic, should your wife give you another chance?'" Artest said "He's saying Ron Artest should have no more second chances. What's worse -- me saying I want to be traded or you cheating on your wife?"
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 30,555
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

 

Post#15 » by whysoserious » Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:29 am

Elevatorman wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



sacrificed his entire career by getting paid tons of money and then never delivering a chip...yeah way to go mats...although i do like mats...if he wants to reamin a leaf bhe better be willing to take 2 million a year...thats all i would give him thats max...2 years....other then that not worth holdign the rest of the team down from getting fgood free agents


Beside's making a fair amount of money. What more could Sundin do with linemates like Jonus Hoglund and such. He's never fairly been surrounded by player's of his talent. Roberts was much older and definitely a good player, but not at the same level. One year he had Mogilny, but even he was older.

Do you truly believe, that the Leafs teams put on the ice in the last 7-8 year's were legitimate Contender's. I've always believe they were a notch below that category and overachieved a bit due to the stellar goaltending of CuJo.
AOC
Junior
Posts: 470
And1: 8
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

 

Post#16 » by AOC » Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:39 am

vc_dunkchamp wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Beside's making a fair amount of money. What more could Sundin do with linemates like Jonus Hoglund and such. He's never fairly been surrounded by player's of his talent. Roberts was much older and definitely a good player, but not at the same level. One year he had Mogilny, but even he was older.

Do you truly believe, that the Leafs teams put on the ice in the last 7-8 year's were legitimate Contender's. I've always believe they were a notch below that category and overachieved a bit due to the stellar goaltending of CuJo.


I agree that management, even though they put out some pretty good teams, never made the effort to put out a legit contender, but all this about how Sundin sacrificed his career and never complained, you would think that management keeps Sundin locked up in the basement of the ACC. He has signed massive contract here knowing how the team is. Apparantly he likes it because he keeps saying how he doesn't want to play anywhere else.
Marmoset
Veteran
Posts: 2,538
And1: 563
Joined: Nov 17, 2003
 

 

Post#17 » by Marmoset » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:25 am

I'm okay with him making relatively big money on a two-year deal. One, because they're going to basically be screwed under the cap anyway. There's no way he's signing for less than $5 mil, another mil or so won't make a difference. Second, two years won't kill the future if it doesn't work out and/or he goes downhill fast - unlike the deals handed out to guys like McCabe.

Of course, if management miraculously wakes up and sees the light, and gets a good GM who is allowed to do his job, then everything goes out the window.
(Sorry for beating that poor horse again.) I'm assuming JFJ or whoever replaces him won't have a mandate to conduct a proper rebuilding.
Southward1
General Manager
Posts: 9,066
And1: 2,411
Joined: Jul 31, 2006
       

 

Post#18 » by Southward1 » Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:15 pm

He's not worth anymore than 5 million a season. If he wants more then that, then I think it's time to move on
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 30,555
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

 

Post#19 » by whysoserious » Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:39 am

Southward1 wrote:He's not worth anymore than 5 million a season. If he wants more then that, then I think it's time to move on


If it's for a couple of year's tops, maybe 5 million is okay. But with the new NHL, prime earning year's for player's is now probably 25 to 33, anyone older will have to be the exception just because the cap is so restrictive.
User avatar
CPT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,292
And1: 2,770
Joined: Jan 21, 2002
Location: Osaka/Seoul/Toronto
         

 

Post#20 » by CPT » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:33 pm

Would any other team give Sundin 5 million per?

I don't think so, so why should we?

Return to Toronto Maple Leafs