ImageImageImage

Raycroft Drawing Interest

Moderator: Crowned

User avatar
Tor-Rap-Tor
Junior
Posts: 490
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Location: Here!

Raycroft Drawing Interest 

Post#1 » by Tor-Rap-Tor » Sun Dec 16, 2007 3:56 pm

http://www.torontosun.com/Sports/Hockey ... 1-sun.html

According to TSN hockey insider Darren Dreger, at least three clubs -- the Pittsburgh Penguins, Tampa Bay Lightning and Los Angeles Kings -- have called the Leafs inquiring about Raycroft, who has become entrenched in his role as Toronto's backup behind starter Vesa Toskala.


I think Clemmensen could easily fill in as back-up...

The Question is what would we get in return and would we need Razor as insurance should we make the play-offs. It would be nice to dump Raycroft and pick-up a prospect or draft choice, I would like Gary Roberts and a draft choice from Pittsburgh...
User avatar
MAS
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,271
And1: 53
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: Thornhill
     

 

Post#2 » by MAS » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:17 am

I think they'd be looking for an NHL defenseman

I'd be looking at Shane O'Brien from Tampa Bay

Though the rumour is Raycroft will be put on waivers (then re-entry waivers if necessary) and we make a move for Derek Morris.

Raycroft would probably be picked up by Pittsburgh for half the price then
User avatar
Tor-Rap-Tor
Junior
Posts: 490
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Location: Here!

 

Post#3 » by Tor-Rap-Tor » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:45 pm

MAS wrote:I think they'd be looking for an NHL defenseman

I'd be looking at Shane O'Brien from Tampa Bay

Though the rumour is Raycroft will be put on waivers (then re-entry waivers if necessary) and we make a move for Derek Morris.

Raycroft would probably be picked up by Pittsburgh for half the price then


The real reason to deal Raycroft is to free up his cap hit and with Toskala's 4 million contract kicking in next year, it would be too much for a goalie tandem, when Clemmensen could be signed for a lot less...

I do however think we should hold on to him until the trading deadline because as our back-up, he is the best option if we make the play-offs and in that case, as there is a dearth of NHL goalies he would be just as valuable to us as to anyone...

Whatever we get for him is really unimportant, as it's the cap hit we are trying to get rid of but at the trade deadline his value may increase and a good prospect or draft choice may be offered and that would be a bonus...
User avatar
The-Insider
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,674
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 22, 2005

 

Post#4 » by The-Insider » Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:28 am

Afterall, Anaheim had to waive Bryzgalov. I can't see how we could trade Raycroft unless it was for a salary dump on the other team. New Jersey gave San Jose a 1st rounder to take Malakhov, Colorado offered a 1st to take Theodore.

After one season of Raycroft's services, this is what it's come down too. I just wish we kept Rask and our picks. We probably would've missed the playoffs though... oh wait :sigh:
Image
Griff83
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,832
And1: 187
Joined: Dec 10, 2006

 

Post#5 » by Griff83 » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:15 pm

MAS wrote:I think they'd be looking for an NHL defenseman

I'd be looking at Shane O'Brien from Tampa Bay

Though the rumour is Raycroft will be put on waivers (then re-entry waivers if necessary) and we make a move for Derek Morris.

Raycroft would probably be picked up by Pittsburgh for half the price then


why would Tampa deal a very solid defencemen in O'Brien, who they gave up a first round pick to anaheim to add a goalie in raycroft who isnt really any better then Holmqvist or Denis?
Marmoset
Veteran
Posts: 2,538
And1: 563
Joined: Nov 17, 2003
 

 

Post#6 » by Marmoset » Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:00 am

Tor-Rap-Tor wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I do however think we should hold on to him until the trading deadline because as our back-up, he is the best option if we make the play-offs and in that case, as there is a dearth of NHL goalies he would be just as valuable to us as to anyone...


I like the idea of holding onto him until closer to the deadline, in the hope that some team will be desperate enough at that point to take a chance on him. But, if someone offers to take him off our hands now, it would be hard to say no.

It's somewhat of a paradox in that if he's playing well enough to increase his value, you probably don't want to trade him.

Without the winning streak, there's no dilemma, but it looks like the Leafs are going to be in the same situation as the last two years - right on the bubble. That makes it very hard to dump a guy like Raycroft for picks and prospects - trading him would be better for the future, but would hurt the goaltending for this year.
User avatar
MAS
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,271
And1: 53
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: Thornhill
     

 

Post#7 » by MAS » Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:01 am

Griff83 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



why would Tampa deal a very solid defencemen in O'Brien, who they gave up a first round pick to anaheim to add a goalie in raycroft who isnt really any better then Holmqvist or Denis?


That's just who I'd want, that's not a rumour ;)
emfive
General Manager
Posts: 9,746
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: Lake Wilcox

 

Post#8 » by emfive » Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:39 am

MAS wrote:I think they'd be looking for an NHL defenseman

I'd be looking at Shane O'Brien from Tampa Bay

Though the rumour is Raycroft will be put on waivers (then re-entry waivers if necessary) and we make a move for Derek Morris.

Raycroft would probably be picked up by Pittsburgh for half the price then


Only if the Pens wait to pick him up on the way back up.
bryant08
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,969
And1: 27
Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Contact:
       

 

Post#9 » by bryant08 » Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:21 pm

The-Insider wrote:Afterall, Anaheim had to waive Bryzgalov. I can't see how we could trade Raycroft unless it was for a salary dump on the other team. New Jersey gave San Jose a 1st rounder to take Malakhov, Colorado offered a 1st to take Theodore.

After one season of Raycroft's services, this is what it's come down too. I just wish we kept Rask and our picks. We probably would've missed the playoffs though... oh wait :sigh:


I've heard that many GMs were aware of Burke's promise to Bryz that he would put him on waivers if he didn't trade him, and that was why no one made a move. I really think that all players are truly tradeable, and Raycroft will garner something out of a team in need. But if he keeps up these mediocre performances, the interest level will continue to diminish. JFJ is probably trying to use those 37 wins as bait for any takers, but at this point the best thing he could probably pry out of someone is a mid round pick.
emfive
General Manager
Posts: 9,746
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: Lake Wilcox

 

Post#10 » by emfive » Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:10 pm

At this point, Mike Penny is not even interested. :P

Return to Toronto Maple Leafs