Griff83 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Theres no way you get a player like Huselius for that cheap especially seein its rumoured the cap is rising about 6 million more then it currently is. Huselius is pretty much a 30 goal scorer going forward with first line minutes on a leafs team and thats worth about 4 million under the new cap system. Sure the Leafs should look at trying to pry a RFA but thats hard because most teams would match any offer a outside team would make unless you crazy overbid for him like the Oilers did with Penner.
Huselius is still relatively young (29 isnt that bad) with room to improve, I dont think comparing him to the likes of Blake is necessarily fair. I would like this team to rebuild as much as anyone but I dont see it happening and if they do retool I dont think Huselius at 4 million is so bad considering his skill and the fact our team severly lacks wingers with speed who can score and the guys also decent in the shootout and the rising cap figure.
"but if you have the chance to get a Daniel Briere, then by all means go for it"
^^ so you would be cool with this team paying Marion Hossa 8-10 million dollars a year?
I agree that there's no way that you'd get a player like Huselius that cheap, which is why I wouldn't sign him. He's not what the Leafs need right now, at least not for $5 mil a season.
Would I go for Hossa? Two years ago, absolutely. With Sundin possibly retiring, it's a more difficult decision. He'd be the wingman Sundin has always needed, but if Sundin isn't here, can Hossa carry a team? Many people in the NHL are skeptical of that, and I'm not sure he can either.
For me, the point is that where the Leafs are, they need impact players, not depth players. The Leafs have lots of good players, but very few impact players, both in terms of veterans and in terms of young players.
Huselius is a good player, better than most guys on the Leafs, but not an impact player. Hossa can be an impact player, and that's why I'd seriously think about signing him. He's still not too old either and has some very good years ahead of him. Ultimately, I probably wouldn't because I want to rebuild properly and that means stinking out the joint next year (and one or two after that) to try and land Tavares or another bright prospect or two.
BTW, I didn't mean to compare Jason Blake to Kristian Huselius in terms of their skills - it's more in terms of the types of signings. And Blake was clearly a more dangerous signing because it was 'career year syndrome'.
I don't think signing Huselius would be a particularly good or bad move, I just don't think it really gets this team anywhere.