ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: That Sucked

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,199
And1: 7,416
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#241 » by prophet_of_rage » Sun Dec 8, 2024 8:57 pm

knicksNOTslick wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:It has become increasingly tiring the bipolar reactions here after wins and losses. We lose, people want to trade Bridges and Hart for Lavine or now Bridges for Brogdon. WTF? This is a good team, there is room to grow and reason to believe they will.

People don't realize that making more trades means the team has to adjust again to build chemistry. And by the time they're in their adjustment period, the same people will be complaining that the team isn't doing as well as they should and call for another trade.

This board is unreadable sometimes after losses because of the overreaction.
And wins!

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,970
And1: 6,023
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#242 » by R-DAWG » Sun Dec 8, 2024 9:00 pm

HEZI wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
HEZI wrote:
They have a 111 rating and we have a 114 rating. Yes it’s very meh. Most teams in that top 10 aren’t serious threats and when you look at last season, most of the top 10 rated defenses got bounced out in the 1st or 2nd round and some didn’t even make it to the playoffs. Mavs with a defensive rating of 114 made it to the finals. That’s the same defensive rating the Knicks currently have.

KAT is terrible on switches and to ask him to defend the ball handler up high on a switch play after play game after game is just crazy talk. He’s too vital offensively to put that responsibility on him defensively as a big. That’s certainly not a recipe for success.

Haven’t paid much attention to Bridges when he was in Brooklyn but apparently his defense fell off long before he got here. That’s not on Thibs. Not sure how you have watched him play defense this year and think he’s been good. He has been awful.

There is no IHart to anchor the defense and tell me why aren’t teams who apparently defend the 3 better than we do not having more playoff success than we are? Besides one and that’s the team that won’t the chip with multiple elite defenders on the roster. If what you are complaining about hold true for the Knicks, why is it not providing better results for the rest of the league? A bunch of 1st and 2nd round exits and no playoffs for the majority of them all. Because good offense beats good defense almost every time. Knicks haven’t been all that good offensively over the past few years.




The gap between a 111 DRTG and 114 is 8 spots, that is a big gap when differences are measured in single points, this is like saying a second in an F1 race isn't that big a deal when it's an eternity in that sport. And we all know the Celtics are coasting, so I'm not sure what the point is using them. The Thunder are the top defensive team in the NBA, they play at a faster pace than us and teams take less threes against them, they don't just concede three pointers to protect the paint, they prioritize stopping you from getting good looks from three and then making sure you don't get good looks in the paint. We prioritize protecting the paint over everything and the proof is in the pudding, we have been no higher than 10th defensively the last 4 seasons - 11, 19, 10, 18. If the roster keeps changing and the same problem persists, it's the coach.

KAT grades out as average to slightly above average on switches, saying he is terrible at it doesn't even make sense. You're tearing down every aspect of his defense to defend Tom, KAT literally played power forward and had to chase around wings last season, he even guarded KD in the playoffs, 78 possessions and KD was 7-17. This season when he's been caught on switches he's defended them well, he's better at guarding on switches than he is at defending the rim. You're basically throwing your hands up and saying there's nothing Thibs can do because he's tried nothing else, and nothing else works. 2 years ago with a different roster when had the 19th best defense with Mitch and IHart, because we kept giving up an insane amount of three point looks. Since the 3 point explosion Tom's defenses have not been great, period.


So Reggie Bullock and RJ are better defenders than OG and Hart? I see you didn't answer that, because they were on a team that was ranked 3rd defensively, the best defense Tom has ever had in NY was with those two wing defenders. I said last season we had IHart, OG and Hart on the team, our defense was still not great and by your own defintion it was "meh", and it was abysmal in the playoffs where we had a 120 DRTG. How did we have such a crappy defense with an elite rim protector and elite perimeter defender, could it have been the scheme? Why didn't you address this? I'm not even sure what you're arguing now, because the Celtics were 4th in the league last year at defending and limiting threes, believe it or not the year before that when the Nuggets won the title they were 3rd in the league in opponent 3 pointers made and 9th in opponents attempts and 3rd in opp 3pt percentage, they stopped you from taking them and making them :lol: If your hope is that we're like the Nuggets with an overpowering offense and a mid defense, we're not, because they didn't want you getting three point looks.


You keep ignoring how terrible Brunson is defensively. You are trying to brush that under the rug but I’ll remind you each and every time, he is awful and he can’t guard his matchup or the switch. So comparing us to teams that switch who clearly have better defensive backcourt that can successfully throw multiple schemes it just lacks any type of logic. Celtics can switch with an elite backcourt so therefore we can too with Jalen freakin Brunson and KAT :lol: They got perimeter defense and shot blocking. Pretty sure Thunder have superior defenders on the perimeter than we do too.

Also wasn’t the top rated defense last year a drop coverage team?

Philly is usually a top rated defense too and they suck in the playoffs. They even have a top rated defense this year, have you seen their record? Your argument is inconsistent because your formula is proven to be inconsistent yet you keep trying to convince me it’s a solution when it clearly isn’t based on multiple evidence league wide year after year.

As far as OG, he’s in a group of his own. You can lump Bullock from a few years ago with RJ, Hart and Mikal. I’m not seeing much if any difference there. I remember we had RJ guarding the ball handler and full court pressing at one point because nobody else could.

Last years Knicks team had a top 9 defense so by your standard they were good. See how easy your argument is flipped?

Just checked the scores from that Pacers series and I didn’t even have to watch it to tell you where the issue was. It wasn’t the defense. In the Knicks wins they scored 121,130,121. In their losses they scored 106, 89 :lol: , 103, 109. Pretty easy to see they lost because the offense struggled and it wasn’t because of the defense.


Yes - one of the challenges of building a team around Brunson and KAT is both guys are subpar defenders. Is what it is.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,474
And1: 27,159
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#243 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Dec 8, 2024 9:01 pm

8516knicks wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:
Buttah304 wrote:Knicks had: More points in the paint, more steals, more blocks, more points in transition, more second chance points and less turnovers

It’s just become so glaringly obvious that our struggle defending the 3PT shot is a schematic issue. This isn’t something that you can attribute to one player. I also don’t believe it’s as simple as “just close out hard” - if you watch closely you’ll see a handful of occasions where our players backs are quite literally turned to the 3PT shooters. It’s baffling to me.

Historically, everyone knows that Thibs has been obsessed with closing off the paint valve. If you don’t believe me, watch his somewhat stoic reaction on the sideline to giving up a 3 vs when we concede a layup/back door cut. He visibly blows a gasket on the sideline to the point where it looks like he needs a medical timeout.

As far as Precious & Mitch coming back, sure that’s going to help our interior defense. Statistically speaking, and narratives aside (even though they are fun), that’s not where we are struggling. We are very middle of the pack with respect to points in the paint given up and DFG% in that very same area.

Having said that, we are 29th in the NBA in defensive 3PT % and 29th in 3PT attempts conceded per game.

We make it very easy for the opposing coaching staff. We’re going give up a ton of 3s, and statistically speaking guys are gonna hit them at a well above average clip.

IMO, Cade dropped 29 but I would have lived with him going for 42 so long as we were utterly hellbent on defending 25+ feet out.

Reality: My gut tells me that we are going to continue to put 2 on the ball and overreact to every single driver. We are way too reactive of a defense when our principles should be based on being proactive with more of a switching philosophy.


When we had a DPOY type underneath the basket in Mitch or IHart.....the perimeter defenders sagged less in the paint and were up on the 3 ball.

If we keep Thibs we need the defensive stud 7 footer under the basket....Im telling you.


i don't think it can be Mitch - he can't stay on the active roster, let alone the court. Can we get two halfway decent (even if less talented) rim protectors for him? Either by draft picks or trade? He's actually making like twice his nominal salary per game BECAUSE HE"S ALWAYS INJURED. :noway:


This is a myth anyway. No matter who is in the paint we sag off the perimeter to guard the drive the same exact way. Wherever the ball is on the court, guaranteed there is a wide open shooter in the opposite corner. Then we are frantically trying to rotate out to him. Constantly.

The other issue is one pick sets for wide open threes because we either go under or can't get over the screen. Constantly.

Fighting through screens all night can take its toll as well. Especially when you just played 35-40 minutes already and there's another 5 left in the game!

Thibs gets regular season results but, there's plenty to talk about that isn't good. He still has to prove he can make the playoffs with a healthy team. Then we can really talk about how good of a coach he is.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,300
And1: 22,812
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#244 » by RHODEY » Sun Dec 8, 2024 9:15 pm

Thibs needs to lock Bridges in a room and make him watch this 100o times...
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,888
And1: 10,515
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#245 » by tmorgan » Sun Dec 8, 2024 9:24 pm

RHODEY wrote:Thibs needs to lock Bridges in a room and make him watch this 100o times...


Whoever said Mikal has taken the Jerami Grant path is 100% correct. That last bit in Phoenix, along with his tenure on the Nets, has changed his mindset to offense. The same thing happened to Jerami when he got to be “the man” for a season in Detroit, and he can’t or won’t change back.

Buckets gets you dollars.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 77,475
And1: 54,328
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#246 » by MrDollarBills » Sun Dec 8, 2024 9:37 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:On another note, I'm all aboard the KAT for MVP train.

It's Jokic and it's not even close


I'd still vote for KAT because I'm biased.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 16,507
And1: 9,177
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#247 » by spree8 » Sun Dec 8, 2024 11:22 pm

tmorgan wrote:
RHODEY wrote:Thibs needs to lock Bridges in a room and make him watch this 100o times...


Whoever said Mikal has taken the Jerami Grant path is 100% correct. That last bit in Phoenix, along with his tenure on the Nets, has changed his mindset to offense. The same thing happened to Jerami when he got to be “the man” for a season in Detroit, and he can’t or won’t change back.

Buckets gets you dollars.



OG got 200+ mil scoring just 14 ppg for us but providing elite defense…
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 17,790
And1: 6,030
Joined: Jun 04, 2005

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#248 » by ctorres » Sun Dec 8, 2024 11:31 pm

Don't worry you guys, I have a foolproof strategy for winning against the Raptors tomorrow. I'm definitely gonna throw Scottie Barnes and RJ Barrett off their game once they see my comments on social media.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#249 » by Clyde_Style » Mon Dec 9, 2024 12:12 am

ctorres wrote:Don't worry you guys, I have a foolproof strategy for winning against the Raptors tomorrow. I'm definitely gonna throw Scottie Barnes and RJ Barrett off their game once they see my comments on social media.


RJ's mother already wears army boots so I doubt that will work
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#250 » by K_ick_God » Mon Dec 9, 2024 12:53 am

Shake it off

Cunningham seems like he’s becoming great
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,188
And1: 3,871
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#251 » by KnixinSix » Mon Dec 9, 2024 12:58 am

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
8516knicks wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:
When we had a DPOY type underneath the basket in Mitch or IHart.....the perimeter defenders sagged less in the paint and were up on the 3 ball.

If we keep Thibs we need the defensive stud 7 footer under the basket....Im telling you.


i don't think it can be Mitch - he can't stay on the active roster, let alone the court. Can we get two halfway decent (even if less talented) rim protectors for him? Either by draft picks or trade? He's actually making like twice his nominal salary per game BECAUSE HE"S ALWAYS INJURED. :noway:


This is a myth anyway. No matter who is in the paint we sag off the perimeter to guard the drive the same exact way. Wherever the ball is on the court, guaranteed there is a wide open shooter in the opposite corner. Then we are frantically trying to rotate out to him. Constantly.

The other issue is one pick sets for wide open threes because we either go under or can't get over the screen. Constantly.

Fighting through screens all night can take its toll as well. Especially when you just played 35-40 minutes already and there's another 5 left in the game!

Thibs gets regular season results but, there's plenty to talk about that isn't good. He still has to prove he can make the playoffs with a healthy team. Then we can really talk about how good of a coach he is.



This is why I think we keep Mitch and go after the cheaper options in salary matching Nick Richards and Kessler.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#252 » by K_ick_God » Mon Dec 9, 2024 1:25 am

Oh I wanted to mention, a lot of the follows they had last night, Towns would have stopped. And those are each big momentum plays.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,843
And1: 8,101
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#253 » by WargamesX » Mon Dec 9, 2024 2:53 am

RHODEY wrote:Thibs needs to lock Bridges in a room and make him watch this 100o times...

Thibs needs to make his life easier by making Mitch heal so they can spend about a quarter each game doing drop coverage defense which is physically a lot easier than man-to-man, Ice, and switching
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 32,043
And1: 21,058
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#254 » by stuporman » Mon Dec 9, 2024 4:52 am

I'm not sure why anyone would get so indignant about 'playing down' or losing to a .500 or below team this year as if it didn't happen last year, too. The Jazz, Spurs, Rockets, Hawks and Bulls were games the Knicks lost last season to teams like that. Every season there are a handful of 'bad losses' so don't act like last season's team was above this sort of let down game, you're just not being realistic, it happens.

Sure this season there's 3 that could fall in that category but this team also has many new parts still working on jelling and consistency as you all are well aware but are still ahead of the .500 until new year's day pace most Knicks teams start out with under Thibs. Also let's not memory hole the fact historically with Thib's Knicks it's early in the seasons is where most of the defensive inconsistency takes place resulting in the mid starts.

They get better on both ends of the court as the season progresses but more so on the defensive side as the cohesiveness is built as time goes along. Missing key defensive presences to start this season didn't help either so as frustrating as each instance of them not playing up to expectations is don't lose sight of the greater context of what is being built here. Who am I kidding, yall lose your minds at everything and anything.
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,610
And1: 5,742
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#255 » by spree2kawhi » Mon Dec 9, 2024 5:00 am

Moose wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
Moose wrote:Some big overreactions here. But I will agree that Bridges' overall play is concerning.

I was hoping the offense would run through him more, especially for this game with no Towns.

I thought he would be our prime Kris Middleton.

Maybe that’s the problem. Prime Middleton was a top 15 player in the league. We traded them the corpse of Bojan Bogdanovic…


Well our version.

I expected him involved heavier in the offense, running that second unit.

And you can't tell me he wouldn't be playing better with less minutes?

Those legs have to be tired toward the end. A step slower maybe.

I just don't understand his usage and that isn't all his fault.

I was always a strong defender and really taking someone out of the game is exhausting. He plays way too many minutes.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,300
And1: 22,812
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#256 » by RHODEY » Mon Dec 9, 2024 3:23 pm

WargamesX wrote:
RHODEY wrote:Thibs needs to lock Bridges in a room and make him watch this 100o times...

Thibs needs to make his life easier by making Mitch heal so they can spend about a quarter each game doing drop coverage defense which is physically a lot easier than man-to-man, Ice, and switching


Yeh I keep hearing an adequate rim protector will fix 99% of this. What I don't get is how does OG manages to keep his stellar level of defense despite not having one.

Is it because Bridges seems to play a different style of defense? I noticed from the video that Bridges defense seemed focused a lot on steals and sneaky blocks.
User avatar
CharlesOakley
Veteran
Posts: 2,923
And1: 2,873
Joined: Jun 27, 2006

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#257 » by CharlesOakley » Mon Dec 9, 2024 3:54 pm

We go from looking like world beaters to garbage without Kat.
User avatar
FrozenEnvelope
Analyst
Posts: 3,635
And1: 5,008
Joined: Feb 03, 2020

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#258 » by FrozenEnvelope » Mon Dec 9, 2024 5:05 pm

CharlesOakley wrote:We go from looking like world beaters to garbage without Kat.


We didn't lose this game because of KAT. The effort and energy for two and a half quarters was not nearly good enough. We joke but it looked like the players were hung over from partying the night before at the home coming dinner. Everyone was a step slow. Even Thibs didn't look as animated or angry on the sidelines. Normally I would have chalked it up to just having one of those bad games in a long season that happens to every team but we had 50 years of Knicks history in attendance and the effort was disrespectful.
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,188
And1: 3,871
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: PG: That Sucked 

Post#259 » by KnixinSix » Tue Dec 10, 2024 12:15 am

Keeping things in perspective:

Knicks started out 5-6 and are 9-3 since then. Not exactly a bad last 12 games for a team that has reached the second stage of gelling but hasn't fully gelled yet.

Every single team has a few losses to inferior teams too . It happens. Again 9-3 in last 12 is pretty good.

And when Mitchcomes back we can play any defense depending on matchup and ebb and flow of game.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1

Return to New York Knicks