ImageImageImageImageImage

Why this assumption that the knicks will face the celtics?

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 24,773
And1: 22,354
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Why this assumption that the knicks will face the celtics? 

Post#41 » by RHODEY » Fri Apr 11, 2025 10:52 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:I’m on the record Pistons in 5


You need a penalty for being wrong.
I propose that you to promise to post nothing but Knick homer comments for week. :D
Luv those Knicks
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,347
And1: 5,697
Joined: Jul 21, 2001
Location: East of West and West of East.
Contact:

Re: Why this assumption that the knicks will face the celtics? 

Post#42 » by Luv those Knicks » Sat Apr 12, 2025 12:38 am

thebuzzardman wrote:
Luv those Knicks wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:Pistons in 4


I don't see that at all. NY is way too talented. Even if they lose the series, they'll win a few.

Team is soft, coach sucks. Knicks not making it out of round 1


I get what you're saying, but no way in heck do they lose in 4 games. No way.

Could they lose to Detroit or maybe Milwaukee . . . sure. Lose in 4? I don't see it. Ain't happening, just as I have a hard time seeing them wining in 4. I could see them wining in maybe 5 if they get hot.

This is a good team with lots of scoring options and some flaws, but it's still a good team.
You can't spell hatred without red hat.
kNicksGmen
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,701
And1: 2,194
Joined: Jun 24, 2011

Re: Why this assumption that the knicks will face the celtics? 

Post#43 » by kNicksGmen » Sat Apr 12, 2025 12:48 am

whocares1 wrote:I mean say what you want about Thibs but the Knicks have only gotten eliminated in the first round once and that was with Randle. People claimed they were going to lose to Cleveland and they beat them pretty easily. They also claimed that the Knicks were going to lose to Philly last season. Now this year it’s the Pistons that’s going to supposedly eliminate them.

i feel like the way that series is remembered isn't fair to the cavs.

it was closer than people remember and they missed a ton of wide open 3s (thibs defensive specialty).

mitch and ihart dominated yes but most games came down to the stretch and hart hit some timely 3s as their gameplan was to smartly leave him open (backfired). the idea that thibs outcoached bickerstaff or knicks won easily, dominated etc etc is a bit of a stretch.

game 1 knicks barely won by 4 - brunson clutch down the stretch
game 2 cavs won in a blowout
game 3 knicks won in a blowout
game 4 knicks won with a big 4th quarter. game was close and i remember hart hitting a few grenades (aka lucky shots) late.
game 5 knicks came out and won convincingly - at that point i think the cavs spirit was already broken as they were down 3-1

so yea knicks won "convincingly" but 2 of the knicks wins were close that they pulled out in the 4th / down the stretch with some hart heroics.

Return to New York Knicks