ImageImageImageImageImage

Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 111,969
And1: 115,539
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#321 » by mpharris36 » Mon Jul 7, 2025 9:25 pm

kNicksGmen wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
sol537 wrote:
Extensions: Mikal at 4 years, $32m starting seems pretty fair (4th year player option) and then Mitch at 3 years (3rd year team option), $11m starting also seems pretty fair in today's market. Both would become easily tradable contracts for value IMO.



It could be "fair". But he is also eligible for 4 years 156 MM right now...whats his incentive to take less? If he waits until next year he would be eligible for basically the OG contract. The Knicks wouldn't risk that but your asking him to take less already when signing the full extension is already him taking less.
The incentive to take less would be risk/reward - is there a team willing to give him more as a free agent? Maybe but it's a risk.
I've read it could actually benefit the knicks to have a handshake deal with him to have more flexibility this upcoming offseason.

Not sure what you mean "asking him to take less already" - there is no guarantee he is worth a max so I would not view it as "taking less" if he took the full extension. especially these days in this new CBA - the idea that "less than the absolute max you can get by waiting a year and another team having the cap to do it" is not something I would consider a discount - for any player outside of like the top 8-12 maybe. What is bridges? top 40 maybe?



There are no guarantees with anything but the simple fact is he doesn't "have to" sign the extension now especially if the Knicks aren't offering him the full extension at the moment.

And as we have seen with the Turner contract...teams can get creative with opening up cap space so and the Knicks regimes MO has been not to let guys get to FA. They did it when the Randle contract talks broke down by a difference in value. The go by the model better to move a guy a year early than a year too late.

The fact of the matter is I know Knicks fans love to clown on Mikal...he had a pretty good year last year. Outside a #1 option (offensive engine) Mikal archetype is the 2nd most valuable in the NBA as a 2-way wing...those players don't grow on trees. Its why in the season before the Knicks acquired Mikal both memphis and HOU offered 4 1st rounder packages for him as well.
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Jase Richardson
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,155
And1: 26,779
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#322 » by Jalen Bluntson » Mon Jul 7, 2025 9:28 pm

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:also, don't be mad at him if he decline that option and get real bread next summer.


The option is for next year? Damn. I thought was two years plus a player option. It's all about this season right now then. Let's win it all and who cares what happens next!!


I mean, I’m a fan of dude but don’t look at him as a must-have. This is really his best and probably last chance to get a birkin. He plays well on a winner and somebody will Hartenstein him.

If he’s back for the second year of these terms, something went wrong for both sides.


If he plays better than his deal, having that second year like we did with Shart would be better for both sides. It helps us retain some form of bird rights. It makes other teams offer more to get him away from us. If he sucks, who cares? Win win.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,343
And1: 30,372
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#323 » by Jeff Van Gully » Mon Jul 7, 2025 9:34 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
The option is for next year? Damn. I thought was two years plus a player option. It's all about this season right now then. Let's win it all and who cares what happens next!!


I mean, I’m a fan of dude but don’t look at him as a must-have. This is really his best and probably last chance to get a birkin. He plays well on a winner and somebody will Hartenstein him.

If he’s back for the second year of these terms, something went wrong for both sides.


If he plays better than his deal, having that second year like we did with Shart would be better for both sides. It helps us retain some form of bird rights. It makes other teams offer more to get him away from us. If he sucks, who cares? Win win.


Yes. Of course. Great for us. But terrible for him if he was good enough for a long-term deal at 30. We’d have to make space to keep him if he’s anything like we hope.

Excited to finally have him either way.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 17,857
And1: 15,834
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A magical land of rainbows and cotton candy trees where the Knicks D gonna F you up
   

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#324 » by BKlutch » Mon Jul 7, 2025 10:48 pm

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
I mean, I’m a fan of dude but don’t look at him as a must-have. This is really his best and probably last chance to get a birkin. He plays well on a winner and somebody will Hartenstein him.

If he’s back for the second year of these terms, something went wrong for both sides.


If he plays better than his deal, having that second year like we did with Shart would be better for both sides. It helps us retain some form of bird rights. It makes other teams offer more to get him away from us. If he sucks, who cares? Win win.


Yes. Of course. Great for us. But terrible for him if he was good enough for a long-term deal at 30. We’d have to make space to keep him if he’s anything like we hope.

Excited to finally have him either way.

With iHart, we weren't allowed to offer as much as other teams. I believe with Yabu, we may compete with other teams on an even footing. So we'll have a choice to make, but it's not as bad as knowing we had to lose iHart.
.

____________________
____________________


:basketball: * We have a Brunson Burner™ * :basketball:
* Make the Knicks Champs Again *
:basketball: ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** :basketball:
____________________
____________________

.
.
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 31,786
And1: 20,563
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#325 » by stuporman » Tue Jul 8, 2025 4:52 pm

Didn't realize Yabuty is 29, thought he was mid 20s but he almost 30, wow
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
kNicksGmen
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,754
And1: 2,251
Joined: Jun 24, 2011

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#326 » by kNicksGmen » Tue Jul 8, 2025 5:00 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
kNicksGmen wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

It could be "fair". But he is also eligible for 4 years 156 MM right now...whats his incentive to take less? If he waits until next year he would be eligible for basically the OG contract. The Knicks wouldn't risk that but your asking him to take less already when signing the full extension is already him taking less.
The incentive to take less would be risk/reward - is there a team willing to give him more as a free agent? Maybe but it's a risk.
I've read it could actually benefit the knicks to have a handshake deal with him to have more flexibility this upcoming offseason.

Not sure what you mean "asking him to take less already" - there is no guarantee he is worth a max so I would not view it as "taking less" if he took the full extension. especially these days in this new CBA - the idea that "less than the absolute max you can get by waiting a year and another team having the cap to do it" is not something I would consider a discount - for any player outside of like the top 8-12 maybe. What is bridges? top 40 maybe?



There are no guarantees with anything but the simple fact is he doesn't "have to" sign the extension now especially if the Knicks aren't offering him the full extension at the moment.

And as we have seen with the Turner contract...teams can get creative with opening up cap space so and the Knicks regimes MO has been not to let guys get to FA. They did it when the Randle contract talks broke down by a difference in value. The go by the model better to move a guy a year early than a year too late.

The fact of the matter is I know Knicks fans love to clown on Mikal...he had a pretty good year last year. Outside a #1 option (offensive engine) Mikal archetype is the 2nd most valuable in the NBA as a 2-way wing...those players don't grow on trees. Its why in the season before the Knicks acquired Mikal both memphis and HOU offered 4 1st rounder packages for him as well.

If anything the Turner contract shows that paying Bridges 40+ is a bit absurd. I would argue a stretch big rim defender is just as valuable as a "2 way wing" especially when bridges defense has fallen off and offensively has serious limitations - nobody is sold on the initial few months he had with the nets anymore.

Referencing the randle contract situation isn't unfair but it's not like it's something the front office has done over and over. It was also a unique situation since the fit was questionable and there were doubts about his ability to perform in the playoffs. Do the knicks dump randle for a worse package if the Kat trade never materialized? I highly doubt it - they would have ended up treating it similar to how the wolves did.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 94,518
And1: 135,387
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#327 » by 3toheadmelo » Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:50 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 80,942
And1: 94,350
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#328 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jul 12, 2025 1:40 pm

I'm penciling Yabasule for about 30 mpg after watching Huk play yesterday
Image
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 34,782
And1: 35,440
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#329 » by Fat Kat » Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:28 pm

Read on Twitter
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 17,857
And1: 15,834
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A magical land of rainbows and cotton candy trees where the Knicks D gonna F you up
   

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#330 » by BKlutch » Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:39 pm

Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter

We're all so desperate for some news we like this video. But in reality, the only thing worse than a highlight video is a 3 point practice shooting video. LOL
.

____________________
____________________


:basketball: * We have a Brunson Burner™ * :basketball:
* Make the Knicks Champs Again *
:basketball: ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** :basketball:
____________________
____________________

.
.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 80,942
And1: 94,350
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#331 » by thebuzzardman » Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:42 pm

BKlutch wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter

We're all so desperate for some news we like this video. But in reality, the only thing worse than a highlight video is a 3 point practice shooting video. LOL


I'm reluctant to comment because the moderators are lurking like ICE at a Quinceañera
Image
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,155
And1: 26,779
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Shams: Knicks, Guerschon Yabusele agree to deal 

Post#332 » by Jalen Bluntson » Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:51 pm

BKlutch wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter

We're all so desperate for some news we like this video. But in reality, the only thing worse than a highlight video is a 3 point practice shooting video. LOL


It's a first look at him in Orange and Blue!!
Image

:rofl2:
:beer: RIP mags

Return to New York Knicks