I like Zach because

fimslim3 · Post #41 » by **fimslim3** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:08 am

I just don't see how some posters think Randolph is a better defender then Lee. Lee is a much better lateral quickness, plays help defense, and uses his body to be a good post defender. Something I haven't seen Randolph do.

king_k4life · Post #42 » by **king_k4life** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 5:15 am

fimslim3 wrote:I just don't see how some posters think Randolph is a better defender then Lee. Lee is a much better lateral quickness, plays help defense, and uses his body to be a good post defender. Something I haven't seen Randolph do.

First and Second you are wrong

fimslim3 · Post #43 » by **fimslim3** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 5:16 am

king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

First and Second you are wrong

Care to explain how I am wrong?

DoubtingThomas · Post #44 » by **DoubtingThomas** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 2:56 am

I like both players but I don't think you can keep both. I think Zach might be more talented but I think I would keep Curry because of his size. I don't think guys like Curry come around very often. However, both of these guys need to play with a 4 or 5 who defends, blocks shots and rebounds. My preference is to keep Curry. I think Zach has better all around skills but the combination of Curry's size and talent are too much to give away. I know about all of Curry's weaknesses.

king_k4life · Post #45 » by **king_k4life** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 2:58 am

fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Care to explain how I am wrong?

No not really

fimslim3 · Post #46 » by **fimslim3** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 3:44 am

king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

No not really

That's because you can't, take a look at his turnovers. How many does he have thus far tonight?

randomhero423 · Post #47 » by **randomhero423** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 3:46 am

he doesn't feel like looking for that either because it'll prove him wrong like he usually is about everything..

king_k4life · Post #48 » by **king_k4life** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 3:47 am

fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That's because you can't, take a look at his turnovers. How many does he have thus far tonight?

Lee is a much better lateral quickness, plays help defense,

What that gotta do with Turn Overs ?

Slimpack · Post #49 » by **Slimpack** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 3:48 am

I like Zach because he makes sure that we'll be in the lottery this season

fimslim3 · Post #50 » by **fimslim3** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 3:53 am

king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

What that gotta do with Turn Overs ?

When did I say it did? I separated two separate facts with a sentence.

king_k4life · Post #51 » by **king_k4life** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:14 am

fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Care to explain how I am wrong?

king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

No not really

fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That's because you can't, take a look at his turnovers. How many does he have thus far tonight?

king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

What that gotta do with Turn Overs ?

???

You said his lateral quickness and help D are better. I said you are wrong, you said you can't look at his turnovers. I said what does turnovers have to do with Help D and Lateral Quickness

fimslim3 · Post #52 » by **fimslim3** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:20 am

king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

???

You said his lateral quickness and help D are better. I said you are wrong, you said you can't look at his turnovers. I said what does turnovers have to do with Help D and Lateral Quickness

Since when are the two mutually exclusive? I brought in that fact from watching his poor play today. Another reason why Lee is better then Randolph outside of Randolph's atrocious defensive play. Something you have failed to prove at how it is better then Lee.

king_k4life · Post #53 » by **king_k4life** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:22 am

fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Since when are the two mutually exclusive? I brought in that fact from watching his poor play today. Another reason why Lee is better then Randolph outside of Randolph's atrocious defensive play. Something you have failed to prove at how it is better then Lee.

Yo

You said That his Help D Sucks more than Lee

I said False

You said Look at his turnovers ?

F_ck that gotta do with his help D

randomhero423 · Post #54 » by **randomhero423** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:24 am

omg king. he's not saying turnovers have anything to do with d. he's just stating another reason why lee is better then randolph.

you know what he meant stop being a dumb***

fimslim3 · Post #55 » by **fimslim3** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:27 am

king_k4life wrote:Yo

You said That his Help D Sucks more than Lee

I said False

You said Look at his turnovers ?

F_ck that gotta do with his help D

Do you know what commas and sentences do? They separate two separate thoughts, I randomly brought in a separate thought to talk about how Lee is better then Randolph outside their individual play on the defensive end, do you follow?

HKSVIP · Post #56 » by **HKSVIP** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 5:33 am

Are you guys serious? If we had last year's team with Randolph instead of Curry I bet we would be much better than only 33 wins. Curry doesn't play defense either. I think Frye was our best down low defender. If he was here alongside Zach we would be a better team. The only things Curry can do better than Zach is dunk and eat.