ImageImageImageImageImage

Biggest Chuckers

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully

midtown
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
 

Biggest Chuckers 

Post#1 » by midtown » Sun Jan 6, 2008 6:06 am

Who are the biggest chuckers on the knicks ?

For all of you who say Z is the problem , tale a look at who is way ahead of him with career stats


JC

Q

Marbs

then Z


Just FYI.......

This whole team needs to be blown upImage
User avatar
Slimpack
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,989
And1: 85
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
Location: Location: Location:

 

Post#2 » by Slimpack » Sun Jan 6, 2008 6:14 am

Image = chucker.
chitownsports4ever
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 22,699
And1: 4,087
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: southside of chicago
       

Re: Biggest Chuckers 

Post#3 » by chitownsports4ever » Sun Jan 6, 2008 6:18 am

midtown wrote:Who are the biggest chuckers on the knicks ?

For all of you who say Z is the problem , tale a look at who is way ahead of him with career stats


JC

Q

Marbs

then Z


Just FYI.......

This whole team needs to be blown up(picture)


please this is so shallow


Career stats are meaningless because youve only brought them up to hide what is CURRENTLY happening and thats theyve all given Randolph all the shots he's wanted .Please name me another situation where a non all star joins a team with 3 guys who can get 20 ppg and manages to get 18-20 fga per game to start the season ?

If you were to give all those guys 20 fga and ran plays for them all game which of them would give the current team the best chance to win ?

Randolph is not even in the top 2
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"
User avatar
randomhero423
Head Coach
Posts: 7,013
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by randomhero423 » Sun Jan 6, 2008 6:21 am

LOL at career stats arguement...

first year he averaged 5 minutes. 2 fga
second year he averaged 17 minutes. 7 fga
third/fourth/fifth year he averaged 35 minutes. 17 fga
sixth year 35 minutes. 19 fga

the guy is a serious chucker.
My High School Basketball Articles:
www.nyhoops.com

My Sports Blog
myrandomsportsblog.blogspot.com
midtown
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
 

Re: Biggest Chuckers 

Post#5 » by midtown » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:51 am

chitownsports4ever wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



please this is so shallow


Career stats are meaningless because youve only brought them up to hide what is CURRENTLY happening and thats theyve all given Randolph all the shots he's wanted .Please name me another situation where a non all star joins a team with 3 guys who can get 20 ppg and manages to get 18-20 fga per game to start the season ?

If you were to give all those guys 20 fga and ran plays for them all game which of them would give the current team the best chance to win ?

Randolph is not even in the top 2


Point is all of these guys are have rather low FG%. They aloso dont average a lot of assists.... . I thought shoing the career numbers would be of use and not taken the wrong way.

This team sucks no matter how you slice it. It sucked last year also


....w/out Z

Defend all you want. Ive done that for 4 years . I want change in the form of a new GM who will gut this team
Boss_
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,852
And1: 263
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by Boss_ » Sun Jan 6, 2008 10:50 am

You wanna talk about dead ball movement, ZBo, Curry, Crawford are all responsible for chucking up bad shots when they recieve a pass in a half court set. All one on one streetball crap no discipline. I'd list Nate too, but lately the guy has been pretty efficient and making the extra pass when he takes it to the hole...Marbury has deterred his offense to our other shot happy players...With all these scorers on our team, Im suprised Isiah hasnt placed a minimum 3-4 passes first before shot rule, or create tons of back door plays a la Rick Adelman with Houston/Sacramento since these guys are "great scorers". But at this point, who gives a crap eh? Can't wait till this whole roster gets blown up...
knicksNOTslick
RealGM
Posts: 17,881
And1: 5,185
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: NYC Queens
     

 

Post#7 » by knicksNOTslick » Sun Jan 6, 2008 12:06 pm

Here's where it went wrong.

All this time, Marbury's been told that he has to change his game. He didn't like that at first, but he accepted and he wasn't as efficient. It's not his game. Then when they start losing, Marbury whines because he wants to see results. He changed his game, now where are the wins.

Fact of the matter is... Marbury used to be the most efficient scorer on the team. Therefore, he should be or should have been on attack mode all the time. The less efficient scorers, Crawford, Curry and Zach should all be 2nd fiddle. Marbury could get all of them the ball and share it accordingly.

Isiah should have made it that way since the beginning of last year. Had Marbury been doing his 20 and 8 instead of deferring to Crawford and Curry, we would have more wins.
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,840
And1: 19,421
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

 

Post#8 » by KnicksGadfly » Sun Jan 6, 2008 2:52 pm

I would be okay with Stephon getting more shots. He drives to the basket and draws the fouls. Zach is kind of predictable. He gets the ball on the high post, and you know he's gonna shoot it. But FIRST he has to fake three times. Then he shoots! Even if he makes it, it's annoying as hell. And I have to agree with midtown in that Q-rich should not be shooting at all.

Return to New York Knicks