Post#117 » by thebuzzardman » Thu Jun 28, 2012 4:05 pm
Yeah, we get it, you don't like the Knicks "plans" because they involved getting Melo for Gallo and one young asset too many. Geeze, get over it already. I used to LOVE reading your posts and game threads but now almost dread seeing a a TKF post because it inevitably leads back to "I don't like the Melo trade"
Knicks may or may not have had the BEST plan, but I saw them:
Upgrade PF in a big way (possible too much money, but so be it)
Upgrade SF in a big way, for a go to scorer, certainly what any "good" team needs.
Upgrade C in a big way. Now, may not have been part of the "original" plan, but a damn good reaction,that's for sure
They certainly used a #1 pick to get a guard, which was needed. They went after a guard in this weird last season and suceeded, again filling a need.
They went after a stretch the floor 3 point shooter, which was definitely needed, and got him
They drafted a back up big man, which was needed and took a flyer on a big man project, not a bad idea
They screwed the pooch on PG preparations but still decided they should take a flyer on a young PG who was released, seemed to work out "ok"
I think the Donnie\Grunfeld GM leadership has been "good". Not great. Not bad. Solid good.
did we all forget that undoing Isiah's mess is part of the picture here?
And then you bring up "oh, Houston has a better record than us last 10 years" Um, yeah, no kidding, EVERYONE had a better record than the Knicks in the Layden\Isiah years.
I don't get it. Melo's not perfect, Stat's not perfect, I GUESS we could have let everything expire, but folks around here act like we broke up the 67 Celtics or something. I like the Gallo\Felton\Stat\Chandler team too, but come on.
I swear, this board and others, people pined for a "star" for a good PF, for a real C, for a decent PG for YEARS, and then when they have all of the above, all they can do is nit pick and cry. Makes me wonder, it really does.