ImageImageImageImageImage

Grunwald depreciation day

Moderators: dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully

User avatar
boomann21
RealGM
Posts: 26,105
And1: 2,777
Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Location: In the Wind

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#101 » by boomann21 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:27 am

Rasho Brezec wrote:
boomann21 wrote:If Walsh would of drafted Brandon Jennings, Kenneth Farried, and Lance Stephenson we would be looking so pretty right now. Instead we got Landry "The Brick Layer" Fields, Jordan "Beat my Girl" HIll, and the artist formerly known as Iman Shumpert.

If Walsh drafted 1 good player and 2 bad players instead of 1 good player and 2 bad players we would look the same.


Your post boggles the mind. So are you saying Brandon Jennings is not good?
Image
User avatar
Rasho Brezec
Knicks Forum Euro Scout
Posts: 61,931
And1: 18,566
Joined: Mar 12, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#102 » by Rasho Brezec » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:42 am

If shooting below 40% for your career is considered good, then more than half of this league is filled with superstars.
Image
User avatar
boomann21
RealGM
Posts: 26,105
And1: 2,777
Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Location: In the Wind

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#103 » by boomann21 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:49 am

Rasho Brezec wrote:If shooting below 40% for your career is considered good, then more than half of this league is filled with superstars.


Lol, No one's called him a superstar.
Image
User avatar
Rasho Brezec
Knicks Forum Euro Scout
Posts: 61,931
And1: 18,566
Joined: Mar 12, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#104 » by Rasho Brezec » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:50 am

Because superstars can make more than 40% of their shots.
Image
User avatar
Stannis
RealGM
Posts: 19,521
And1: 12,905
Joined: Dec 05, 2011
Location: Game 1, 2025 ECF
 

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#105 » by Stannis » Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:27 am

I believe I have to eat my words. I used to say things like "Thank God for Grunwald". I still think he did a decent job with the assets he was given; however, he went too old. It was not just Grunwald's fault. Woodson had a say as well.

As far as Lin goes, the Knicks need a young penetrating guard. I believe if it was up to Grunwald, Lin remains a Knicks.

It is difficult for a GM to succeed with Dolan at the head.
Free Palestine
End The Occupation

https://youtu.be/mOnZ628-7_E?feature=shared&t=33
User avatar
RutgersBJJ
General Manager
Posts: 8,749
And1: 125
Joined: Oct 05, 2008

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#106 » by RutgersBJJ » Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:32 am

Mr_Perfect wrote:
RutgersBJJ wrote:He's doing the best with what he has to work with. Amare was here before he got here. Our top 10 pick in 2009 was not here because we drafted a bust who's salary we needed off the books. Grunnie wasn't the one who wasted a first round pick on Toney Douglas. ALL of our young players were gone instead of just our 2008 1st round pick in exchange for Melo because we drafted Gallo over Gordon and Lopez. Grunnie wasn't the one who drafted Shumpert over Faried.

He's responsible for Chandler over Billups, for Kidd, Camby, JR, and K-Mart all on the cheap. While his blunders were the contracts he gave Felton and Novak which run way too long for the bench caliber players they are.

Most of the blame falls on Walsh for his inability to amass talent while purging the roster of contracts and for HIS decision to give Amare a max contract. Walsh is the one who had full control, who constructed this rebuild, and decided to put 20 million of a 58 million dollar cap into an extremely risky asset which has returns that aren't even that valuable when he is healthy.

He's basically doing what Alderson is doing right now for the Mets, except Alderson actually got young players with real talent while purging the roster of overpaid veterans. Walsh forgot the young players with high ceilings part.


Yes, the man who saved the franchise from years more of laughingstock and failure ruined the team.

Not the owner who undermined his every move, but the only man who actually did something right here the last decade. Good post.


I love how you just live in a fantasy world where it wasn't Walsh who signed Amare. All Walsh did when he came here was what anyone with half a brain would do. Yet you apparently appoint him the messiah just because he isn't as dumb as the moron before him. All he did was convince fans to tolerate purging every contract we had off the books. Unfortunately he has a terrible eye for championship level talent which is why he chose to commit 20 million a year to a player who isn't even as good as the PF we had on the roster before the purge. Drafted Jordan Hill when even a scrub like Brandon Jennings is better than him and would have had more trade value than him. Drafted Gallinari over an all-star (Lopez), and the piece that single-handedly got Chris Paul. That singular draft pick is now why we get the privilege watching JR Smith be our sixth-man and not Wilson Chandler. Then to make matters even worse his final gift to this franchise was to draft Iman Shumpert over Kenneth Faried.

Walsh gave Amare 100 million dollars. Amare as of now has received close to 40 million of that in exchange for 1 playoff win with him, two playoffs in a row he has let us down with his health that was a concern before he was even signed. Certainly seems like a joke to me. Maybe some of you are okay with being slightly better than average, but I'm not. Walsh sold the fans on a plan that would get us to contend for a title, not one that would have us switch places with the 2007-2010 Atlanta Hawks.

All Walsh had to do was not waste the 100 million on Amare or get great value from even 1 of his draft picks. He failed us just like he failed the Pacers, and is why he will die without ever knowing what a championship ring looks like on his finger. Close isn't good enough, certainly not in this city.
RIP Jared Jeffries. Gone but never forgotten...2006-2012
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,141
And1: 54,962
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#107 » by Deeeez Knicks » Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:58 am

The margin for error the past few years was very slim and Walsh and Grunnie simply made too many costly mistakes.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Mr_Perfect
Head Coach
Posts: 6,127
And1: 2,931
Joined: May 01, 2012

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#108 » by Mr_Perfect » Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:09 am

RutgersBJJ wrote:
Mr_Perfect wrote:
RutgersBJJ wrote:He's doing the best with what he has to work with. Amare was here before he got here. Our top 10 pick in 2009 was not here because we drafted a bust who's salary we needed off the books. Grunnie wasn't the one who wasted a first round pick on Toney Douglas. ALL of our young players were gone instead of just our 2008 1st round pick in exchange for Melo because we drafted Gallo over Gordon and Lopez. Grunnie wasn't the one who drafted Shumpert over Faried.

He's responsible for Chandler over Billups, for Kidd, Camby, JR, and K-Mart all on the cheap. While his blunders were the contracts he gave Felton and Novak which run way too long for the bench caliber players they are.

Most of the blame falls on Walsh for his inability to amass talent while purging the roster of contracts and for HIS decision to give Amare a max contract. Walsh is the one who had full control, who constructed this rebuild, and decided to put 20 million of a 58 million dollar cap into an extremely risky asset which has returns that aren't even that valuable when he is healthy.

He's basically doing what Alderson is doing right now for the Mets, except Alderson actually got young players with real talent while purging the roster of overpaid veterans. Walsh forgot the young players with high ceilings part.


Yes, the man who saved the franchise from years more of laughingstock and failure ruined the team.

Not the owner who undermined his every move, but the only man who actually did something right here the last decade. Good post.


I love how you just live in a fantasy world where it wasn't Walsh who signed Amare. All Walsh did when he came here was what anyone with half a brain would do. Yet you apparently appoint him the messiah just because he isn't as dumb as the moron before him. All he did was convince fans to tolerate purging every contract we had off the books. Unfortunately he has a terrible eye for championship level talent which is why he chose to commit 20 million a year to a player who isn't even as good as the PF we had on the roster before the purge. Drafted Jordan Hill when even a scrub like Brandon Jennings is better than him and would have had more trade value than him. Drafted Gallinari over an all-star (Lopez), and the piece that single-handedly got Chris Paul. That singular draft pick is now why we get the privilege watching JR Smith be our sixth-man and not Wilson Chandler. Then to make matters even worse his final gift to this franchise was to draft Iman Shumpert over Kenneth Faried.

Walsh gave Amare 100 million dollars. Amare as of now has received close to 40 million of that in exchange for 1 playoff win with him, two playoffs in a row he has let us down with his health that was a concern before he was even signed. Certainly seems like a joke to me. Maybe some of you are okay with being slightly better than average, but I'm not. Walsh sold the fans on a plan that would get us to contend for a title, not one that would have us switch places with the 2007-2010 Atlanta Hawks.

All Walsh had to do was not waste the 100 million on Amare or get great value from even 1 of his draft picks. He failed us just like he failed the Pacers, and is why he will die without ever knowing what a championship ring looks like on his finger. Close isn't good enough, certainly not in this city.


This whole post is a joke and unworthy of the wasted keystrokes.
User avatar
NYK_89
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,855
And1: 72
Joined: Mar 03, 2011

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#109 » by NYK_89 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:01 am

He did what he could, signing Lin would have made us a lot better but i can sorta understand being afraid of the like 50m in tax for lin.....
Nono
Banned User
Posts: 1,320
And1: 65
Joined: Feb 24, 2012

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#110 » by Nono » Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:39 am

NYK_89 wrote:He did what he could, signing Lin would have made us a lot better but i can sorta understand being afraid of the like 50m in tax for lin.....


Yeah but we went ahead and spent up even more money than we were giving to Lin on completely useless players. Novak, who is 0-11 from three on this road trip. Kidd, who is now a walking dead. Felton and Pablo who both haven't really given us what we need. Whatever Lin was asking they should have just given it to him from Novak's and Kidd's contracts. Hell, they could still have Lin + Felton for the same money they now have Novak, Felton, Pablo and Kidd.
Ginger Bean
Senior
Posts: 738
And1: 222
Joined: Mar 04, 2012

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#111 » by Ginger Bean » Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:58 am

I can understand teams not wanting any part of the new luxury tax. Bulls declined to match Asik too, and he's been tremendous defensively for Houston. I guess neither the Knicks or Bulls wanted to pay luxury tax for players viewed as "backup" quality.

But if money is a concern, I don't understand the contracts for Camby, Kidd, Novak. Felton is an OK bargain for the most part.

I guess Kidd and Camby would have signed elsewhere if not for the bigger/longer money in NY.
Sprewell4Three
General Manager
Posts: 9,326
And1: 4,772
Joined: Apr 08, 2011

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#112 » by Sprewell4Three » Fri Mar 15, 2013 11:53 am

As long as Dolan is still the owner its useless to complain about Grunwald. We need to start at the top & clean house....

Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#113 » by Greenie » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:10 pm

Ewing2Melo wrote:People want to blame him for Lin?!?! The guy had 2 good weeks in NY, the NY media made him out to be something he's not.. a superstar.

You can't overpay someone for having 2 good weeks than getting injured. He wanted to get paid. The Knicks actually made their first smart move in a long time.

Yes and no. Lin is not worth the contract and is a mediocre player however, letting him go for absolutely nothing knowing we have no assets.......................not so smart. I would have matched Lin just to trade his a**.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#114 » by Greenie » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:15 pm

GONYK wrote:
Ewing2Melo wrote:People want to blame him for Lin?!?! The guy had 2 good weeks in NY, the NY media made him out to be something he's not.. a superstar.

You can't overpay someone for having 2 good weeks than getting injured. He wanted to get paid. The Knicks actually made their first smart move in a long time.


Not really. He didn't adversely affect the cap. The only thing he affected was the lux tax.

Lin is not a star at this stage of his career, but he would have been a great change-of-pace guard for us, and another source of offense at the very least.

A lot of teams seem really scared of this. Say whatever you want but we are not paying that luxury tax, Dolan is. Maybe he felt Lin was not worth it, so far his play has not warranted being so.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#115 » by Greenie » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:17 pm

seren wrote:
Ewing2Melo wrote:People want to blame him for Lin?!?! The guy had 2 good weeks in NY, the NY media made him out to be something he's not.. a superstar.

You can't overpay someone for having 2 good weeks than getting injured. He wanted to get paid. The Knicks actually made their first smart move in a long time.


The only thing that would be affected was Dolan's bottomline.

Just goes to show you Dolan doesn't care about winning a championship.

Cheap bast*rd...

Lin is not the difference in a championship.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#116 » by Greenie » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:24 pm

GettinitDone wrote:Lin would have done wonders for us. I'm his fan for a reason, he has this knack for influencing his teammates to run and move the ball. The Rockets team without him playing iso-Harden are a sorry ass team, but when Lin plays and starts moving the ball, and sacrificing, the whole team also moves the ball.

I remember vividly when Woody took helm last year, when Melo got back from injuries, we were blowing out teams because we set the tempo offensively in the beginning of games and jumped on teams in the first quarters. In the middle of it all was Lin quarterbacking everything. Everyone had the ball. Those that didn't have the ball kept moving and kept finding ways to be open. Shump got 1-2 alley oops a game from Lin, Fields got 1-2 backdoor cut alley oops a game from Lin. Everyone had easy baskets and because the offense was so easy, they made commitment to play D. Now in contrast, the iso stuff made it hard for everyone to contribute offensively and when the offense is hard, players naturally worry about it more than defense.

I am a fan of Lin not because of Linsanity, or hoping he would average 30ppg and 15apg... but rather, again, he has uncanny knack for making his teammates move the ball, sacrifice, and focus on one thing they have in common: winning.

But apparently, Felton is "a much better fit" for this team. You can never win in multi-billion dollar industry worrying about money. Being money smart is appreciated, but should never get in the way of good judgment/ analysis of talent. And out of all teams, we are the most valuable, richest, capital city of the world and the owner of this team is worried about several millions of dollars? Damn.

So much wrong with this post. Are you a Knick fan or are you a Lin fan. Where was all this grief when the Knicks were winning? Now that they are down here all the Lin fans come. Last time I checked Lin ain't been great. So what's all of this for? Venting? Go vent where Lin is at.............. Houston.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#117 » by Greenie » Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:11 pm

GONYK wrote:
MaseInYourFace wrote:Yup Novak was a bad signing. But it's not too much of a killer either. If you want to kill Grunwald for anything it's that he didn't leave himself a lot of space for flexibility for the next few years. He basically locked himself in for the next couple of years.


The only clear mistake I think Grunwald pulled was picking up Chauncey's contracts, then amnestying him like a week later.

That was our get out of jail free card, and we used it on a player who we didn't have to pay in the first place.

I know why he did it. We would have need Billups' contract in any potential CP3 deal. But to commit to the longshot, and then waste the amnesty after it was a bit ridiculous.



I will never forgive him for that.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,707
And1: 45,165
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#118 » by GONYK » Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:14 pm

greenhughes wrote:
GONYK wrote:
MaseInYourFace wrote:Yup Novak was a bad signing. But it's not too much of a killer either. If you want to kill Grunwald for anything it's that he didn't leave himself a lot of space for flexibility for the next few years. He basically locked himself in for the next couple of years.


The only clear mistake I think Grunwald pulled was picking up Chauncey's contracts, then amnestying him like a week later.

That was our get out of jail free card, and we used it on a player who we didn't have to pay in the first place.

I know why he did it. We would have need Billups' contract in any potential CP3 deal. But to commit to the longshot, and then waste the amnesty after it was a bit ridiculous.



I will never forgive him for that.


We couldn't have gotten Tyson without it though, in hindsight, since Billups had a like $4M guaranteed.

And everyone knows how much you love Tyson
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#119 » by Thugger HBC » Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:16 pm

greenhughes wrote:
GONYK wrote:
MaseInYourFace wrote:Yup Novak was a bad signing. But it's not too much of a killer either. If you want to kill Grunwald for anything it's that he didn't leave himself a lot of space for flexibility for the next few years. He basically locked himself in for the next couple of years.


The only clear mistake I think Grunwald pulled was picking up Chauncey's contracts, then amnestying him like a week later.

That was our get out of jail free card, and we used it on a player who we didn't have to pay in the first place.

I know why he did it. We would have need Billups' contract in any potential CP3 deal. But to commit to the longshot, and then waste the amnesty after it was a bit ridiculous.



I will never forgive him for that.

I'm hoping GONYK means Donnie Walsh because Grunwald didnt pick up billups option, it was done one week after we got swept, Grunwald wasnt in office then, Walsh was.

and for the record, Billups was amnestied during the next season...has everyone forgot we had a lockup?

Billups option...April 2011

Billups amnesty...December 2011.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,707
And1: 45,165
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Grunwald depreciation day 

Post#120 » by GONYK » Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:19 pm

Thugger HBC wrote:
greenhughes wrote:
GONYK wrote:
The only clear mistake I think Grunwald pulled was picking up Chauncey's contracts, then amnestying him like a week later.

That was our get out of jail free card, and we used it on a player who we didn't have to pay in the first place.

I know why he did it. We would have need Billups' contract in any potential CP3 deal. But to commit to the longshot, and then waste the amnesty after it was a bit ridiculous.



I will never forgive him for that.

I'm hoping GONYK means Donnie Walsh because Grunwald didnt pick up billups option, it was done one week after we got swept, Grunwald wasnt in office then, Walsh was.

and for the record, Billups was amnestied during the next season...has everyone forgot we had a lockup?

Billups option...April 2011

Billups amnesty...December 2011.


Yea, I think I acknowledged my mistake somewhere else.

Walsh picked up the option, which I agreed with.

Grunnie used the amnesty, which I did not (until I was educated about CB's guaranteed portion).

Return to New York Knicks