berkkobe7 wrote:Inform you guys that Enes Kanter shots %35 in 3 point shots. It's equivalent of %100 in MSG:
He's 5/15 on the year from 3.
He's been balling lately, though. 15/7 in 25MPG in his last 5 games
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
berkkobe7 wrote:Inform you guys that Enes Kanter shots %35 in 3 point shots. It's equivalent of %100 in MSG:
nykballa2k4 wrote:Fat Kat wrote:Boarder Patrol wrote:
No discussion on this forum "does anything" in that nothing actually impacts the day-to-day operations of the NBA. Thankfully it still exists to let us share opinions.
True, but you appear to be attempting to rally support behind something that has no chance of happening. The discussion is ok, but the receptiveness is corny. Just my opinion though. Watching games and participating in game threads, but rooting for losses is weird, but do your thing man.
I think that people who are pro-tank are not really cheering for losses. They may post on the internet "oh boy another miss, thats another ping pong ball!" but I am sure they are actually in person cheering for the win.
I can relate my experience: This season, I really don't care about wins/losses. We could go 2-80 and it would not affect me. Truth be told, I would be interested in the draft and about what could be done in the off-season. Remember the Miami Heat were basically created after an abysmal season. Ironically Toronto helped Miami steal Bosh because they sent down JO's expiring deal for Marions corpse. That roster somehow managed 48 wins (not much of a somehow, literally every other team was terrible)
From that roster they kept 5 guys: Wade, Haslem, Joel Anthony, James Jones, Carlos Arroyo.
It would be similar to use only having Melo, Cole, Hardaway, Early, Pablo.
Bottom line: losing today could help us a lot for the next 10 years. I won't be mad if the team tanks. I will support this regime since they have a plan.
ag3 wrote:JBreezeNY wrote:ag3 wrote:
Agree. But if they come back, get healthy and play around 60 games, the Knicks will be a decent team and the tank would be ruined.
Only reason we are 2-6 right now is because without calderon and Bargnani, we have no offense. Yes, the defense will hurt a little bit, but their offense would outweigh it on most nights.
A healthy and in shape starting lineup of:
Calderon
Shumpert
Carmelo
Bargnani
Dalembert
is not a tank team.
You don't think that's a tank team?
Nothing much left to say then.
No. That's a 35-40 win team.
JBreezeNY wrote:ag3 wrote:DaGawd wrote:Which is great for us... as you said we are pretty mediocre even with those 2 healthy.. being mediocre isn't somewhere you want to be with an older team like we have. Better to just suck it up and completely fail this season imo. Get a great pick hopefully and decide if you like a player in the draft who can be a long term building block or use that pick in a trade to aquire a 2nd really good player to go alongside melo
Agree. But if they come back, get healthy and play around 60 games, the Knicks will be a decent team and the tank would be ruined.
Only reason we are 2-6 right now is because without calderon and Bargnani, we have no offense. Yes, the defense will hurt a little bit, but their offense would outweigh it on most nights.
A healthy and in shape starting lineup of:
Calderon
Shumpert
Carmelo
Bargnani
Dalembert
is not a tank team.
You don't think that's a tank team?
Nothing much left to say then.
bkknicks19 wrote:JBreezeNY wrote:ag3 wrote:
Agree. But if they come back, get healthy and play around 60 games, the Knicks will be a decent team and the tank would be ruined.
Only reason we are 2-6 right now is because without calderon and Bargnani, we have no offense. Yes, the defense will hurt a little bit, but their offense would outweigh it on most nights.
A healthy and in shape starting lineup of:
Calderon
Shumpert
Carmelo
Bargnani
Dalembert
is not a tank team.
You don't think that's a tank team?
Nothing much left to say then.
But it's not a tank team. No one is saying that's a championship team or anything crazy but it's not the other extreme either. The miami heat team pre-lebron started MARIO CHALMERS, Wade, QUENTIN RICHARDSON, 2nd year Mike Beasley and JERMAINE O NEAL. Most here would call that a tank team as well and that team went 47-35 and a 1st round exit. Still managed to build a championship team following that. Before anyone says "well lebron, wade and bosh planned it", please remember that the heat had to trade beasley (who was the number 2 pick in the 08 draft) to create the space to re sign wade and sign bosh and lebron. They didn't need to tank in order to build the championship team, they needed smart management, a winning culture and some luck.
All this to say the knicks, despite not winning early in the season, still are on a good path to me, until proven otherwise. If Calderon and Bargs come back and we still can't manage to play respectable ball, Phil will likely make trades. This is not a tank team, nor is this a season to tank. This is a season to do the best we possibly can, and show that we are a smart organization from top to bottom.
ag3 wrote:Enes Kanter will shoot 70% from 3 and break the all time NBA record held by Kobe.
god shammgod wrote:being injured has helped the perception of bargs tremendously. he's gone from a problem to a solution. that's how bad we are.
JBreezeNY wrote:bkknicks19 wrote:JBreezeNY wrote:You don't think that's a tank team?
Nothing much left to say then.
But it's not a tank team. No one is saying that's a championship team or anything crazy but it's not the other extreme either. The miami heat team pre-lebron started MARIO CHALMERS, Wade, QUENTIN RICHARDSON, 2nd year Mike Beasley and JERMAINE O NEAL. Most here would call that a tank team as well and that team went 47-35 and a 1st round exit. Still managed to build a championship team following that. Before anyone says "well lebron, wade and bosh planned it", please remember that the heat had to trade beasley (who was the number 2 pick in the 08 draft) to create the space to re sign wade and sign bosh and lebron. They didn't need to tank in order to build the championship team, they needed smart management, a winning culture and some luck.
All this to say the knicks, despite not winning early in the season, still are on a good path to me, until proven otherwise. If Calderon and Bargs come back and we still can't manage to play respectable ball, Phil will likely make trades. This is not a tank team, nor is this a season to tank. This is a season to do the best we possibly can, and show that we are a smart organization from top to bottom.
Did you really compare a time period when the East was flat out terrible & the Heat actually having talent compared to this garbage team? Dalembert is a bench warmer, Calderon is Billups washed up status, Shump is a glorified role player, Bargnani is a 6th man with sh*tty defense & a inconsistent offensive game to boot.
Don't ever compare that Miami team to us. Jermaine O'Neal's had more defense in his pinky than Dalembert, Acy & Bargnani combined.
For fu*ks sakes you're actually anticipating Bargs, he's fu*king terrible.
I swear everytime I see someone be super optimistic about this team I wanna baptize them in holy water. Y'all need to see the light.
god shammgod wrote:being injured has helped the perception of bargs tremendously. he's gone from a problem to a solution. that's how bad we are.
bkknicks19 wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
True, but you appear to be attempting to rally support behind something that has no chance of happening. The discussion is ok, but the receptiveness is corny. Just my opinion though. Watching games and participating in game threads, but rooting for losses is weird, but do your thing man.
I think that people who are pro-tank are not really cheering for losses. They may post on the internet "oh boy another miss, thats another ping pong ball!" but I am sure they are actually in person cheering for the win.
I can relate my experience: This season, I really don't care about wins/losses. We could go 2-80 and it would not affect me. Truth be told, I would be interested in the draft and about what could be done in the off-season. Remember the Miami Heat were basically created after an abysmal season. Ironically Toronto helped Miami steal Bosh because they sent down JO's expiring deal for Marions corpse. That roster somehow managed 48 wins (not much of a somehow, literally every other team was terrible)
From that roster they kept 5 guys: Wade, Haslem, Joel Anthony, James Jones, Carlos Arroyo.
It would be similar to use only having Melo, Cole, Hardaway, Early, Pablo.
Bottom line: losing today could help us a lot for the next 10 years. I won't be mad if the team tanks. I will support this regime since they have a plan.
This "abysmal season" the miami heat had was a 47-35 team that went to the playoffs and saw their share of losing streaks. Michael Beasly, their top pick prior to Lebron, was sent packing in the offseason once Lebron and Bosh arrived. I have no problem with the knicks putting together a season like that because that makes sense. Tanking the season makes no sense at all and I don't understand ppl who are looking for that to happen. The knicks should continue to try and win and build the team they want to have for the next 4-5 years. You don't do that by tanking. I'd rather just sit back and watch and see how this organization as a whole moves forward this season rather than hoping we throw the season away and pray for a top 3 pick.
bkknicks19 wrote:JBreezeNY wrote:bkknicks19 wrote:
But it's not a tank team. No one is saying that's a championship team or anything crazy but it's not the other extreme either. The miami heat team pre-lebron started MARIO CHALMERS, Wade, QUENTIN RICHARDSON, 2nd year Mike Beasley and JERMAINE O NEAL. Most here would call that a tank team as well and that team went 47-35 and a 1st round exit. Still managed to build a championship team following that. Before anyone says "well lebron, wade and bosh planned it", please remember that the heat had to trade beasley (who was the number 2 pick in the 08 draft) to create the space to re sign wade and sign bosh and lebron. They didn't need to tank in order to build the championship team, they needed smart management, a winning culture and some luck.
All this to say the knicks, despite not winning early in the season, still are on a good path to me, until proven otherwise. If Calderon and Bargs come back and we still can't manage to play respectable ball, Phil will likely make trades. This is not a tank team, nor is this a season to tank. This is a season to do the best we possibly can, and show that we are a smart organization from top to bottom.
Did you really compare a time period when the East was flat out terrible & the Heat actually having talent compared to this garbage team? Dalembert is a bench warmer, Calderon is Billups washed up status, Shump is a glorified role player, Bargnani is a 6th man with sh*tty defense & a inconsistent offensive game to boot.
Don't ever compare that Miami team to us. Jermaine O'Neal's had more defense in his pinky than Dalembert, Acy & Bargnani combined.
For fu*ks sakes you're actually anticipating Bargs, he's fu*king terrible.
I swear everytime I see someone be super optimistic about this team I wanna baptize them in holy water. Y'all need to see the light.
That miami team had more talent than this?? Do you remember quentin richardson? Carlos Arroyo? Rafer Alston?Mario Chalmers was a nobody. Jermaine O'neil was still washed up then, he wasnt a major factor on that team. Michael Beasly was a headcase, inconsistent scorer (look where he is now). THEY WERE A FIRST ROUND EXIT much the way everybody keeps saying we are now and were last season. Also, the East is STILL flat out terrible. No one argues that (except maybe you). I'm comparing them because the situations are actually very similar and if you stopped being so adamant that this team is sooooooo bad and not worth a damn, you might see that too. I've said it before, i don't expect this team to do anythign special, i think they are a first round exit at best. I just don't see anything wrong with that. It's better that they establish something now to have a stronger case for FA's then to tank.
god shammgod wrote:being injured has helped the perception of bargs tremendously. he's gone from a problem to a solution. that's how bad we are.