Manhattan Project wrote:bringbackhoffa wrote:
I mean... you knew what you did the moment you did it.

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Manhattan Project wrote:bringbackhoffa wrote:
I mean... you knew what you did the moment you did it.


Manhattan Project wrote:bishnykfan wrote:Trying to answer this but not easy on my phone at work...give me a couple hours until I’m home to respond to this.
My two cents, just make it simple. You miss your pick, the penalty is missing out on the potential player you wanted. I think this is opening up a very small can of worms.

Capn'O wrote:It sounds to me like if a team doesn't make its pick, the teams behind them have the option to either move up to the higher pick (and salary) slot or wait it out and then pick when the original team's choice is made for them.
The teams behind the lagging team have the benefit of choice. That seems reasonable.

bringbackhoffa wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:bringbackhoffa wrote:
I mean... you knew what you did the moment you did it.


mpharris36 wrote:Capn'O wrote:It sounds to me like if a team doesn't make its pick, the teams behind them have the option to either move up to the higher pick (and salary) slot or wait it out and then pick when the original team's choice is made for them.
The teams behind the lagging team have the benefit of choice. That seems reasonable.
so you technically have to risk a team behind you who may have extra money jusping 2 teams who may be targeting the same player as you pick ahead of you just because you want to pick in you slot? That seems a bit crazy to me.
I don't think that makes any sense.
Its should be this simple. If you get skipped you have every right to miss your pick but when you pick you drafted player goes into that slot. Its the easiest and most fair way to do it.
My main dude Bish,
I would like to keep my draft slot regardless of what Players A, C, and D do. Here is my ranked choice:
1. Amarilla
2. Rosado
HEZI wrote:Y'all really in shambles over $5?

Capn'O wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Capn'O wrote:It sounds to me like if a team doesn't make its pick, the teams behind them have the option to either move up to the higher pick (and salary) slot or wait it out and then pick when the original team's choice is made for them.
The teams behind the lagging team have the benefit of choice. That seems reasonable.
so you technically have to risk a team behind you who may have extra money jusping 2 teams who may be targeting the same player as you pick ahead of you just because you want to pick in you slot? That seems a bit crazy to me.
I don't think that makes any sense.
Its should be this simple. If you get skipped you have every right to miss your pick but when you pick you drafted player goes into that slot. Its the easiest and most fair way to do it.
Here's how to play it.
Player A skips their pick. You are Player B and you want to keep your slot.
You send a PM to Bish.My main dude Bish,
I would like to keep my draft slot regardless of what Players A, C, and D do. Here is my ranked choice:
1. Amarilla
2. Rosado
And Big Papa Bish takes care of you.
You could also pick second at the higher slot. I don't see anything but benefit if you play it correctly.

Context wrote:HEZI wrote:Y'all really in shambles over $5?
you forgot the extension dollars as well it adds up...

HEZI wrote:Y'all really in shambles over $5?

Manhattan Project wrote:bringbackhoffa wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:
I mean... you knew what you did the moment you did it.
The Hoffa Rule.
The Hoffa draft slot manipulation rule.
![]()
![]()

mpharris36 wrote:HEZI wrote:Y'all really in shambles over $5?
you know that isn't the point. One of the most important pieces of BAF is cap management. But I shouldn't have to literally sit in front of my computer even during my time slot even if I'm ready to pick to ensure I won't go over the cap. I could literally have to wait 6 hours potentially if people keep denying wanting to move up and pick. I don't think that is fair.
What seems simple is that your draft slot is tied with a salary. If you miss that pick, whenever you make it the player goes into that draft slot salary. Why would anyone have any issues with that? That seems like the easiest solution.

mpharris36 wrote:HEZI wrote:Y'all really in shambles over $5?
you know that isn't the point. One of the most important pieces of BAF is cap management. But I shouldn't have to literally sit in front of my computer even during my time slot even if I'm ready to pick to ensure I won't go over the cap. I could literally have to wait 6 hours potentially if people keep denying wanting to move up and pick. I don't think that is fair.
What seems simple is that your draft slot is tied with a salary. If you miss that pick, whenever you make it the player goes into that draft slot salary. Why would anyone have any issues with that? That seems like the easiest solution.



Capn'O wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Capn'O wrote:It sounds to me like if a team doesn't make its pick, the teams behind them have the option to either move up to the higher pick (and salary) slot or wait it out and then pick when the original team's choice is made for them.
The teams behind the lagging team have the benefit of choice. That seems reasonable.
so you technically have to risk a team behind you who may have extra money jusping 2 teams who may be targeting the same player as you pick ahead of you just because you want to pick in you slot? That seems a bit crazy to me.
I don't think that makes any sense.
Its should be this simple. If you get skipped you have every right to miss your pick but when you pick you drafted player goes into that slot. Its the easiest and most fair way to do it.
Here's how to play it.
Player A skips their pick. You are Player B and you want to keep your slot.
You send a PM to Bish.My main dude Bish,
I would like to keep my draft slot regardless of what Players A, C, and D do. Here is my ranked choice:
1. Amarilla
2. Rosado
And Big Papa Bish takes care of you. If Player C picks then your pick comes right after it. And so on. You don't need to worry about it anymore. Your pick is in at your slot.
You could also pick second at the higher slot. I don't see anything but benefit if you play it correctly.

Context wrote:thats it!!!! i am no longer drafting Blank...Rosado sounds like a winneryou sold me Cap
3toheadmelo wrote:If somebody misses a pick unintentionallly cause something came up in their lives... then I think the rule isn't much of a problem. When it comes to blatantly missing picks just to pay a cheaper salary then yeah it's an issue. Thankfully it hasn't happened yet which is why we never had this problem.. but of course Hoffa may want to break the tradition for attention.

Capn'O wrote:Context wrote:thats it!!!! i am no longer drafting Blank...Rosado sounds like a winneryou sold me Cap
Rosado's delicate, textbook form on his jumper brings a tear to my eye.

mpharris36 wrote:Capn'O wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
so you technically have to risk a team behind you who may have extra money jusping 2 teams who may be targeting the same player as you pick ahead of you just because you want to pick in you slot? That seems a bit crazy to me.
I don't think that makes any sense.
Its should be this simple. If you get skipped you have every right to miss your pick but when you pick you drafted player goes into that slot. Its the easiest and most fair way to do it.
Here's how to play it.
Player A skips their pick. You are Player B and you want to keep your slot.
You send a PM to Bish.My main dude Bish,
I would like to keep my draft slot regardless of what Players A, C, and D do. Here is my ranked choice:
1. Amarilla
2. Rosado
And Big Papa Bish takes care of you. If Player C picks then your pick comes right after it. And so on. You don't need to worry about it anymore. Your pick is in at your slot.
You could also pick second at the higher slot. I don't see anything but benefit if you play it correctly.
but your still not solving the issue. The team above me might have completely different needs then the team below me. At that point why even have draft slots then? Sometimes you don't have 3 or 4 guys you want at that spot you have only 1 and then a trade out option. My point is no team should be held hostage because a team is sitting on there pick.
I don't see why the solution of if you miss your pick you still have to pick in that spot with that $ slot. Why would anyone have an issue with that amendment. The team missing there pick is the only one penalized which should be the case.
Everything else seems like extra nonsense because a team could sit on there pick and now I would have to take into consideration who is behind me who has totally different needs