WargamesX wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:WargamesX wrote:Because a guy averaging 20/5/5 just isn’t what the Knick need at SG or back up PG
Let’s trade for Brogdon whose scored 11 points in the last 4 games because he’s been out due to injury for two of them.
Trading significant assets for a guy who has proven Jack **** and a weird fit on a mediocre team for 2 years isn’t something I’m longing for.
Our two best players were from the pile of “guys who haven’t proven Jack squat” now including OG who was injured during that Raptors championship run and only been second team defense. That argument holds no weight for the Knicks, if anything him being a former All star would make Murray the most proven commodity this team has traded for in a while, that isn’t way past their prime.
TBF all we gambled on our two best players was cap space. OG's also way more proven than Murray, he's been doing what he's doing for us for years. With Murray we would be hoping for a different player than he's been the past 3-4 years.
If we get Murray I'll gave him a fair chance and hope you guys are right...I did hate the Randle signing when it happened, before being one over by his play, so I'm not dogmatic about my opinions...and I was much more negative towards Randle than I have been towards Dejounte.
...but it's disingenuous to suggest he's as a proven as OG, or that sending Atlanta multiple unprotected future FRPs is a comparable risk to giving Brunson or Randle the kind of contract that Murray will just be starting.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!