RealGM

god shammgod wrote:

rajajackal wrote:

Besart19 wrote:
he shouldnt start until he learns/dares to shoot like a semi scrub like Turner… 22-23 feet, 10-12 feet, 15-18 feet… basically a Kurt Thomas, we dont ask much

ihart can't shoot. why do we act like he can

my guy averages less than 8 points as starter this season and all his shots are near the rim but they talk about him on here like he's dirk

you know why

rajajackal wrote:

god shammgod wrote:

rajajackal wrote:ihart can't shoot. why do we act like he can

my guy averages less than 8 points as starter this season and all his shots are near the rim but they talk about him on here like he's dirk

you know why

Towns >iShart >Mitch. Problem solved next Offseason

thebuzzardman wrote:

rajajackal wrote:

god shammgod wrote:
my guy averages less than 8 points as starter this season and all his shots are near the rim but they talk about him on here like he's dirk

you know why

Towns >iShart >Mitch. Problem solved next Offseason

Be honest now. You're pushing for Towns because he drowns puppies and eats carrion, right?

the wolves gave up every pick they had to move towns away from the center spot because you can't win with him there

Mitch doesn’t have a touch around the rim. Or passing or moving without the ball. He’s not even as good at tips. So of course you are going to talk about Dirk and stuff.

KnicksGod wrote:Mitch doesn’t have a touch around the rim. Or passing or moving without the ball. He’s not even as good at tips. So of course you are going to talk about Dirk and stuff.

very sad to see sham go down this straw man route. my guy can't handle the news that mitch wants to come off the bench. wow.

Someone else had to immediately think of this.

god shammgod wrote:the wolves gave up every pick they had to move towns away from the center spot because you can't win with him there

The Wolves didn't have a Brundle and IShart.

Knicks will make it work.

Mitch will thrive backing up the Stifle Tower.

thebuzzardman wrote:

god shammgod wrote:the wolves gave up every pick they had to move towns away from the center spot because you can't win with him there

The Wolves didn't have a Brundle and IShart.

Knicks will make it work.

Mitch will thrive backing up the Stifle Tower.

the knicks might very well trade for him but he won't be playing the 5. it will be a randle for towns swap and he'll be playing the 4. the wolves proved it's better this year. why would anyone go back to him at the 5 ?

mitch literally beat wilt chamberlain's record for shooting percentage one year. how could he have no touch at the rim ? people just say silly stuff on here and feel like they're right because a fat guy and1s them.

Now that we have Ihart (and Precious) I'd like to see MItch return to the reckless block chaser from when he started. Never mind the fouls, we have backups now.

This how we treating sham in here

god shammgod wrote:the knicks might very well trade for him but he won't be playing the 5. it will be a randle for towns swap and he'll be playing the 4. the wolves proved it's better this year. why would anyone go back to him at the 5 ?

This, I agree with. This front office isn't stupid.

That said, I don't see it happening.

3toheadmelo wrote:This how we treating sham in here

again, this isn't true but if you want to make it seem even possible one of those dummies need to be fat

god shammgod wrote:

3toheadmelo wrote:This how we treating sham in here

again, this isn't true but if you want to make it seem even possible one of those dummies need to be fat

aren’t you the same guy that said we’re all talking about ihart like he’s Dirk when nobody is. looks like that pcp from the 90s is starting to catch up to you. very sad sham very sad.

Sham going out like meek mill

let's be honest, if there's anyone on this entire forum who would get caught eating fries off his wet legs in the pool it's you lol

god shammgod wrote:

thebuzzardman wrote:

god shammgod wrote:the wolves gave up every pick they had to move towns away from the center spot because you can't win with him there

The Wolves didn't have a Brundle and IShart.

Knicks will make it work.

Mitch will thrive backing up the Stifle Tower.

the knicks might very well trade for him but he won't be playing the 5. it will be a randle for towns swap and he'll be playing the 4. the wolves proved it's better this year. why would anyone go back to him at the 5 ?

Wolves are 6+ games better than the Knicks. Why are they trading us their best player again? Because Bing Bong? The only argument I can see if I'm a Wolves fan is financial:

* Gobert's insane contract is untradable without attaching assets.
* KAT's contract which ramps to ( ) $61 million and goes out 4 *more* years.
* ANT is our best player and he's 22. Jaden McDaniels is owed $135 and probably needs to have a bigger role.

After Goberts turd is flushed after 2026 Wolves could just go after whoever fits best with Ant. If KAT is there, he'll be declining making $55 million and Ant will be 24 or 25 hitting his prime. Randle's contract expires after 2026 also which pairs with Gobert nicely, assuming he picks up the player option. He can also decline and try and get a new deal.

nedleeds wrote:

god shammgod wrote:

thebuzzardman wrote:
The Wolves didn't have a Brundle and IShart.

Knicks will make it work.

Mitch will thrive backing up the Stifle Tower.

the knicks might very well trade for him but he won't be playing the 5. it will be a randle for towns swap and he'll be playing the 4. the wolves proved it's better this year. why would anyone go back to him at the 5 ?

Wolves are 6+ games better than the Knicks. Why are they trading us their best player again? Because Bing Bong? The only argument I can see if I'm a Wolves fan is financial:

* Gobert's insane contract is untradable without attaching assets.
* KAT's contract which ramps to ( ) $61 million and goes out 4 *more* years.
* ANT is our best player and he's 22. Jaden McDaniels is owed $135 and probably needs to have a bigger role.

After Goberts turd is flushed after 2026 Wolves could just go after whoever fits best with Ant. If KAT is there, he'll be declining making $55 million and Ant will be 24 or 25 hitting his prime. Randle's contract expires after 2026 also which pairs with Gobert nicely, assuming he picks up the player option. He can also decline and try and get a new deal.

it would strictly be financial for them. that towns contract is insane and they have never been a franchise that has spent a lot. they have new ownership but they could hardly afford to buy the team. they had to look for an additional partner at the last second. so they might have to cut costs after this year. would the knicks do it ? who knows but i wouldn't put it past them.

god shammgod wrote:mitch literally beat wilt chamberlain's record for shooting percentage one year. how could he have no touch at the rim ? people just say silly stuff on here and feel like they're right because a fat guy and1s them.

Feels like a shell game kind of. Touch is not dunking mixed with refusing to shoot and losing the ball.