PG: Not fun
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Re: PG: Not fun
- TKKnicks1
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,723
- And1: 6,049
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
- Location: Dallas
-
Re: PG: Not fun
Wasn't expecting anything different today. Their threes were eventually gonna start falling. They were playing with their backs against the wall and were clearly the more desperate team.
We did a good job switching above the arc and keeping pressure on their shooters first 2 games. I saw a lot of drop coverage today for some reason. Thibs also didn't have any answers for Mazzula today and was out coached.
We did a good job switching above the arc and keeping pressure on their shooters first 2 games. I saw a lot of drop coverage today for some reason. Thibs also didn't have any answers for Mazzula today and was out coached.
Fire Thibs!
Re: PG: Not fun
- Worst_to_First
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,742
- And1: 9,653
- Joined: Feb 25, 2015
-
Re: PG: Not fun
Sucks that Boston got out of their offensive slump before us. That being said we are still up 2 to 1 and have still at least two more games to be played on the road.
Re: PG: Not fun
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: PG: Not fun
KnicksGod wrote:Whatever you say about the chemistry or Thibs, or whatever the critique or angle you look at it, nobody is going to tell you Mikal at 12 points, OG at 2, KAT at 1 for 4, is going to win you a game
Complete bottoming out when you should be on top of the world
To be fair, I have to wonder what Thibs or any coach would have been able to do with Brunson playing the way he did today.
The coach is important, but coaching is still no substitute for floor generalship. Brunson was neither competent at the point today nor his killer self either.
Sometimes we can get away with Brunson frittering away the first half because he is usually so solid in the home stretch, but this was his worst game in a long time and he had very little to contribute.
I don't expect that to happen two games in a row.
Re: PG: Not fun
- Iron Mantis
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,252
- And1: 27,996
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Re: PG: Not fun
god shammgod wrote:KnicksGod wrote:BBALLER4FR wrote:This will be the 2nd All-Star Thibs created, that will look like utter $h!t when he's no longer a Knick. Randle was an All-Star his entire tenure under Thibs...a dud elsewhere. That is his trajectory.
JB?
I think he means Kat
KAT was not an All-Star without Thibs?

Re: PG: Not fun
- K_ick_God
- Site Admin

- Posts: 80,879
- And1: 43,336
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
-
Re: PG: Not fun
god shammgod wrote:Just look at us being up 2-1 as a blessing we didn’t expect. Put it in perspective.
Why do we do it lol
Why why why
Re: PG: Not fun
- Fat
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,626
- And1: 25,760
- Joined: Jan 12, 2013
- Location: Queens, NY
Re: PG: Not fun
Avoided being first team to lose after being up 3-0.
inside today’s loss is a win

inside today’s loss is a win
Baf: Heat Culture
Ayo dosunmu | AirPod | Shead
Devin Booker | Isaac Okoro
Demar Derozan | Haywood Highsmith
Jabari Smith Jr |Harrison Barnes | Achiuwa
KAT | Brook Lopez | Kornet
Ayo dosunmu | AirPod | Shead
Devin Booker | Isaac Okoro
Demar Derozan | Haywood Highsmith
Jabari Smith Jr |Harrison Barnes | Achiuwa
KAT | Brook Lopez | Kornet
Re: PG: Not fun
-
snadler
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,528
- And1: 8,363
- Joined: Feb 16, 2009
Re: PG: Not fun
?s=46&t=a_8CJE4oxCPxhwUi5hQ4Zg
Re: PG: Not fun
- TKKnicks1
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,723
- And1: 6,049
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
- Location: Dallas
-
Re: PG: Not fun
Pritchard and Tatum each had 5 threes. Knicks as a team had 5 threes. Ya not our best game. Just got to win one at MSG. Got another chance Monday.
Fire Thibs!
Re: PG: Not fun
- Worst_to_First
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,742
- And1: 9,653
- Joined: Feb 25, 2015
-
Re: PG: Not fun
Start Mitch and KAT. Our desired result in defense is seeing a Celtic player try to shoot a jumper over anyone of these two’s outstretched arms so one of them will be able to patrol and get the defensive rebound. If they get beat, Mikal and OG are good enough help defenders that can also protect the rim. JB will be the only person in the team that needs help in defense in this regard.
Re: PG: Not fun
- Jeff Van Gully
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 30,584
- And1: 30,766
- Joined: Jul 31, 2010
-
Re: PG: Not fun
god shammgod wrote:Just look at us being up 2-1 as a blessing we didn’t expect. Put it in perspective.
it’s a series
RIP magnumt
thanks for everything, thibs.
Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
thanks for everything, thibs.
Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
Re: PG: Not fun
- Jeff Van Gully
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 30,584
- And1: 30,766
- Joined: Jul 31, 2010
-
Re: PG: Not fun
RIP magnumt
thanks for everything, thibs.
Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
thanks for everything, thibs.
Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
Re: PG: Not fun
- Worst_to_First
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,742
- And1: 9,653
- Joined: Feb 25, 2015
-
Re: PG: Not fun
Fat wrote:Avoided being first team to lose after being up 3-0.
inside today’s loss is a win
Haha nice one I was thinking about this as well.
In 2013 when we were up 3-0 versus the Celtics I got nervous and said not again versus Boston! Good thing Melo and Shump were clutch in Game 6.
Re: PG: Not fun
- mpharris36
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 112,870
- And1: 117,015
- Joined: Nov 03, 2010
-
Re: PG: Not fun
I know it will never happen and taking out Hart will suck in other areas. But I think its so vital to start game 4 off well offensively. That you need to have McBride play more with the starters. We need to force Mazzulla's hand to either put Horford on KAT (which he won't). Or put Horford on Mcbride/OG/Bridges...
that way when we run the Brunson P&R with KAT or a KAT post up they won't be able to help or they will get an open 3 pt shot.
We will lose size and will probably be killed on the glass. But I think tis vital to get off to a better start offensively. That has been the biggest issue.
that way when we run the Brunson P&R with KAT or a KAT post up they won't be able to help or they will get an open 3 pt shot.
We will lose size and will probably be killed on the glass. But I think tis vital to get off to a better start offensively. That has been the biggest issue.
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:
ROSTER
Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
ROSTER
Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
Re: PG: Not fun
- Red Vines
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,871
- And1: 10,229
- Joined: Jun 26, 2005
-
Re: PG: Not fun
Much rather play Hukporti than Mitch at this point, maybe the worst basketball player getting minutes in the playoffs.
Re: PG: Not fun
- god shammgod
- RealGM
- Posts: 138,432
- And1: 137,114
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Re: PG: Not fun
Red Vines wrote:Much rather play Hukporti than Mitch at this point, maybe the worst basketball player getting minutes in the playoffs.
He’s been one of the better players for us
Re: PG: Not fun
- K_ick_God
- Site Admin

- Posts: 80,879
- And1: 43,336
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
-
Re: PG: Not fun
snadler wrote:?s=46&t=a_8CJE4oxCPxhwUi5hQ4Zg
There’s a massive diff between wanting to be urgent and feeling it
Re: PG: Not fun
- TKKnicks1
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,723
- And1: 6,049
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
- Location: Dallas
-
Re: PG: Not fun
Red Vines wrote:Much rather play Hukporti than Mitch at this point, maybe the worst basketball player getting minutes in the playoffs.
Ya know there's a reason why Mazzula keeps doing hack-a-Mitch. Celtics realize Mitch is our biggest weapon. He has the best +/- of the series and our net rating is excellent when he's on the floor. They hack him to force Thibs to take him out of the game. Yes, it sucks he can't make his FTs but the man is single handedly keeping us in games.
Fire Thibs!
Re: PG: Not fun
- JXL
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,039
- And1: 10,399
- Joined: Sep 01, 2013
- Location: New York
- Contact:
-
Re: PG: Not fun
- Worst_to_First
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,742
- And1: 9,653
- Joined: Feb 25, 2015
-
Re: PG: Not fun
mpharris36 wrote:I know it will never happen and taking out Hart will suck in other areas. But I think its so vital to start game 4 off well offensively. That you need to have McBride play more with the starters. We need to force Mazzulla's hand to either put Horford on KAT (which he won't). Or put Horford on Mcbride/OG/Bridges...
that way when we run the Brunson P&R with KAT or a KAT post up they won't be able to help or they will get an open 3 pt shot.
We will lose size and will probably be killed on the glass. But I think tis vital to get off to a better start offensively. That has been the biggest issue.
We do not run enough P&R with JB and KAT and we do not post up KAT as much as we do in good enough positions. I cannot see Thibs doing that now. For Thibs, KAT being able to space the floor is already a win.
More of JB pounding the clock out of the ball with his first option to pass to when he is trapped is Josh Hart. Our fortunes in offense are tied to OG and Mikal showing up.
Re: PG: Not fun
- god shammgod
- RealGM
- Posts: 138,432
- And1: 137,114
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Re: PG: Not fun
We don’t run pnr because Kat is a bad screener














