VirginiaKnickFan wrote:NotPhilJackson wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:Wait, what happened to D'Angelo Russell?
On my d*ck
Apparently.
Was talking about you...

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:NotPhilJackson wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:Wait, what happened to D'Angelo Russell?
On my d*ck
Apparently.

Traveyknicks23 wrote:knickstape21 wrote:No to Bledsoe. Accomplishes nothing. Tank on!
What tank ?
NotPhilJackson wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:NotPhilJackson wrote:
On my d*ck
Apparently.
Was talking about you...


EchelonNYK wrote:K P 6 wrote:Yah im off team tank. I start off every year wanting to win. If it gets bad thats when you tank. Time to set up the environment for the young guns now.
And that's the problem. A true rebuild IS needed. Do you like being a treadmill team?
BeagleBoss wrote:For some reason, as they get closer to trading Melo, I'm getting sad. He wasn't perfect but he's one of the best players in NYK history.
moocow007 wrote:drekwins wrote:Fury wrote:
That's what taints Melo for me. Dude used Brooklyn against us to get his money. Aight. So I really don't care that we're shipping him out now. We gave up mad **** even if they didn't turn out to be stars.
I agree man. However, in regards to the "what could have been." Stop it. Melo was not a great starting piece. He was a good one but so various other teams had better #1s. Better starting pieces during Melos career include:
Kobe
Duncan
KG
LeBron
Dirk
Wade
CP3
Pierce
Kidd
TMac
Vince
Nash
Durant
George
Pau
Prime Rose
Westbrook
Prime Dwight
Prime Roy
There's more that I could list but these are some of the no-brainers. Keep in mind, I'm not saying that they had better careers than Melo or were better than Melo every single year. Some are younger. At some point though, all of these guys were just better. If you're going to have a "what could of been" moment, at least acknowledge that the odds of Melo ever being a champion were slim.
This is misleading. Anthony has been in the league for 13 years. This makes it seem like all these guys were in their prime at the same time. And what's interesting is out of all the names on the list only half of them have won a championship.
knickstape21 wrote:Traveyknicks23 wrote:knickstape21 wrote:No to Bledsoe. Accomplishes nothing. Tank on!
What tank ?
The young and untalented (other than a couple players) Knicks tank.
knickstape21 wrote:Sources: Knicks and Rockets inching closer and closer to deal. Teams are now "at the one yard line."
EchelonNYK wrote:All these other teams are rebuilding while Knicks fans are saying guys are fighting for their jobs. C'mon now, until they realize this, the Knicks will always be a team just outside the range of selecting someone elite.
Traveyknicks23 wrote:EchelonNYK wrote:K P 6 wrote:Yah im off team tank. I start off every year wanting to win. If it gets bad thats when you tank. Time to set up the environment for the young guns now.
And that's the problem. A true rebuild IS needed. Do you like being a treadmill team?
Rather build with the young core than completely tank and establish a losing mentality
drekwins wrote:Fury wrote:louieOrr wrote:It makes me sad too. What could have been if we only could have got him as a fee agent instead of that trade. Whats done is done. Time to move on.
That's what taints Melo for me. Dude used Brooklyn against us to get his money. Aight. So I really don't care that we're shipping him out now. We gave up mad **** even if they didn't turn out to be stars.
I agree man. However, in regards to the "what could have been." Stop it. Melo was not a great starting piece. He was a good one but so various other teams had better #1s. Better starting pieces during Melos career include:
Kobe
Duncan
KG
LeBron
Dirk
Wade
CP3
Pierce
Kidd
TMac
Vince
Nash
Durant
George
Pau
Prime Rose
Westbrook
Prime Dwight
Prime Roy
There's more that I could list but these are some of the no-brainers. Keep in mind, I'm not saying that they had better careers than Melo or were better than Melo every single year. Some are younger. At some point though, all of these guys were just better. If you're going to have a "what could of been" moment, at least acknowledge that the odds of Melo ever being a champion were slim.

newyorker4ever wrote:knickstape21 wrote:Sources: Knicks and Rockets inching closer and closer to deal. Teams are now "at the one yard line."
The question is......are we gonna score a TD or stuck with a field goal. That will depend on the return.
newyorker4ever wrote:BeagleBoss wrote:For some reason, as they get closer to trading Melo, I'm getting sad. He wasn't perfect but he's one of the best players in NYK history.
And he wanted to be here. No matter how bad we were/are he was a New York Knick through and through. We all talk about how stars don't wanna come to New York, well we have a star that wanted to be here and wanted to stay here.
putiger78 wrote:The way I see things is that Houston is looking to do two things as part of this deal... get Melo AND unload Anderson. Obviously, the Anderson contract is a necessity to include to make the money work in any deal. Before the Melo talks, the asking price for teams to take Anderson was two 1sts, so the cost to get Melo AND unload Anderson has to be really high, even with Melo's diminished value. Because the Rockets really don't have ANY meaningful assets after the Paul trade, I have to assume that both picks (20 and 22) and a 21 pick swap are on the table.
I assume that if the trade were the picks and expirings (even those expiring in two years), this deal would be done in a straight up deal. However, I am assuming we balked at taking Anderson even to get those two picks. So now, these extra teams are involved to try ad find someone that finds taking Anderson less odious than we do (the Blazers are the obvious candidate because they have so many 3-year deals to medicore players.
With Portland, if they are willing to trade Harkless and take Anderson, that is really unfair. So what are they getting? I have to assume they want to get rid of Crabbe or Turner, who maybe are more attractive than Anderson to someone (the 4th team?). So then you have Harkless + Crabbe/Turner for Anderson.... does that work for them to get the salary relief or do they want some kind of asset in addition? Do they want one of Houston's two picks, now making our deal look worse.
Now we need a 4th team, someone who potentially is willing to take Crabbe or Turner (but wouldn't take Anderson), might be willing to send out an asset that we want (all of a sudden, our return isn't as good because Portland is grabbing one of Houston's picks or some other asset), but is going to want real assets to do this (one of Houston's picks, someone's expirings, some other player).
It's so damn complicated. Why? Go back to the beginning... Houston is looking to get the best player and dump the worst contract in all these discussions, but have really minimal assets after the Paul trade. Doesn't make them a good trade partner. Houston is trying to satisfy the contrasting needs of three teams and somehow create value out of thin air. It is no surprise this is taking forever.
EchelonNYK wrote:The Knicks are in need of a another elite young prospect to along with KP. And i don't believe Frank is that prospect.
newyorker4ever wrote:knickstape21 wrote:Sources: Knicks and Rockets inching closer and closer to deal. Teams are now "at the one yard line."
The question is......are we gonna score a TD or stuck with a field goal. That will depend on the return.
