TheGreenArrow wrote:Wow…..
The hawks scouting report on the Knicks in the playoffs!!!
Pretty spot on!!!!
Teams don’t think Rj is a good finisher(rightfully so)!!!
The enlarged to build a wall against Randle which we all noticed!!!!
Pretty interesting to actually see!!!
Getting tired of the lame "seeing ghosts" terminology in sports. They double Randle and while Randle is MUCH better at dealing with double and triple teams than he was under Fizzle, it's still a place he has to improve. Especially if the lineup he's playing in features a non shooting C, a non shooting PG (for a couple of games), a spot up shooter in Bullocks and RJ, who is essentially a spot up shooter with SOME ability to drive, hit pull up jumpers.
I'd agree with the scouting report though, and it's pretty much what most people on here are aware of. Good find and good to post it, as it's something to discuss, somewhat in what happened in the series, but more how the new players will help improve this situation, which I think it's pretty clear they will.
-> Short closeouts on Elfrid - solved that problem with Kemba, and honestly, if he is hurt in a future playoff round vs the Hawks, McBride.
-> Make Bullock put in on the floor. Well, I'd say it's better to look at Fournier as upgrading RJ and RJ upgrading (somewhat) Bullocks. Fournier's ability to get all the way to the rim successfully at the wing will be a big improvement over Bullocks and RJ. He still shoots the 3 as well as Bullocks. Defense will be another story. Since this is about Bullocks, RJ can at least attack closeouts and has a more varied game than Bullocks, but isn't the sniper type who goes on hot shooting runs like Bullocks. I'll take RJ.
Big if: If RJ improves his ability to shoot after relocating on a few dribbles and also putting the ball on the floor and hitting mid range jumpers, that's a BIG deal for him and the Knicks overall. I think his finishing at the rim is going to take another year.
-> Avoid fouling RJ coming back left & make him finish. RJ is better finishing left hand. Entire league and every smart fan knows it, been an issue since day 1. However, RJ's right hand is pretty decent now too. He's not a great finisher but Fournier upgrades over him and RJ slides into better/more varied Bullocks role
-> Physical hits on Noel - makes sense. Yup. This is where Mitch helps, and hopefully bigger Mitch helps more, IF bigger Mitch retains his cover the perimeter and recover skills. Still, even skinny Mitch could take hits better than Noel.
Saved Julius for last
-> Make Randle see bodies. So, Randle and the Knicks are going to have to clean up his ability to get flummoxed by the double team and lose his vision. I THINK it'll be solved by roster construction which will lead to somewhat better plays or better execution of the existing plays. Randle may have some responsibility to just be better here, but it MIGHT be solved just by having more varied, better talented players on the floor. Either Rose or Kemba are a shoot/drive/pass threat. Fournier can score all over the floor, facilitate and is an active cutter/relocator. RJ and Fournier should provide about the same level of 3 point shooting as RJ/Bullocks, but RJ cuts to the hoop more, attempts to go inside and attempts midranges, etc. Outside of the Center, Randle will always have 3 players who their man can't spare the double team, but those players aren't one note players, either just being able to score outside or just inside. I think this mitigates the issues Randle had in the playoffs.
I'm looking forward to a team that moves the ball a lot, cuts a lot, attacks closeouts to score or make even another pass that leads to the score. I know Thibs has the reputation of not being the greatest offensive mind, but those Bulls teams that had competent offensive players had a lost of movement and got a number of easy baskets off them. I expect the same here, or at least hope for it.