moocow007 wrote:RHODEY wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:All that matters is that we suck next year (if there's a next year) to get a high pick in the 2021 draft in addition to the Dallas pick.
Then we're really looking at adding an elite prospect + another first round draft pick in a good draft, or use the Dallas pick to move up. The 2021 draft could singlehandedly turn this franchise around.
This year's draft sucks. I'm not expecting we're going to draft a game changer. In fact, I'm more afraid we're going to draft a bust and waste precious minutes, training and development resources on him, whoever he may be.
But I hope this new front office will be wise enough to understand we need to suck one or two more years, unless of course our success is driven by our young players, mainly RJ and Mitch, in which case you have to let them do their thing.
Damn forgot about those Dallas picks...

They aren't going to amount to much. They've got Luka and Porzingis locked up long term and a ton of cap space after the upcoming season. Dallas has a strong stable front office, is in a large city, nice weather, has no state tax and already has 2 young stars on it. They'll be able to attract another start to team with the 2 they have (both of whom should be hitting their peak) in the season leading up to the 'unprotected' 1st that Dallas owes the Knicks. Those picks are Fool's Gold. Steve Mills was the Fool and the picks are the Gold. This is the image I have in my head of how the other 29 GM's in the NBA reacted to the news of Steve Mills firing.

Don't care if they are in the 20's. They are cost free assets until drafted, then, X amount of cost controlled, cheap talent after drafted (if Knicks retain those picks)
Not going to re-litigate the KP trade, and Mills sucked and Perry no great shakes, but getting a couple of first round picks, even not great ones, is a positive.
Obviously, how well they scout in that range those years, luck in the draft, luck around any Dallas misfortune, ability to swing a trade with one or both of those picks, that that trade be good, etc all play into just HOW positive it was to get them, but getting extra 1st round picks, even low ones, in the 2 Dallas picks and then the Clippers pick, are positive moves in the right direction for the Knicks.
Even though signing journeyman JAGS, while how they were used sucked, the fact that longer term cap space was maintained (minus Randle - even not bad) was also a positive step.
Might be "GM'ing 101" or "Basics of competent NBA team management" but for the Knicks, that's kind of a big deal.
Which of course they'll probably screw up massively.