2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath (Part 2)

bigfnjoe96 · Post #1141 » by **bigfnjoe96** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:05 am

Clyde_Style · Post #1142 » by **Clyde_Style** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:06 am

Guano wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Guano wrote:

they have let that deranged lunatic run rampant for 4 years and stage a coup the other day and are getting a committee, a committee, to see if they can remove him 12 days before he is going to be done with his term. I hope i'm wrong but i see nothing substantial happening.

he is already walking back his tough talk - setting the table for the Dems to take the cowardly inaction path.

All of this bashing and no substance. In the two years since the Dems recaptured the House they produced a massive stack of legislative bills that Mitch would not let proceed.

Please itemize EXACTLY what you would have done this past four years without Sentate control.

- did you ask me to itemize a list. FOH - i'm union.

so IOW you have no answer about what they could have done that would have satisfied you

Clyde_Style · Post #1143 » by **Clyde_Style** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:11 am

Phish Tank wrote:

Read on Twitter

Twitter banned Trump.... 4+ years too late.

Glenny boy's gonna have a hissy fit

AFT

Clyde_Style · Post #1144 » by **Clyde_Style** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:13 am

8516knicks wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:I can’t. It’s too much.

Read on Twitter

#TheWorstCoup

He had balls, he did.

Not anymore

Guano · Post #1145 » by **Guano** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:19 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
Guano wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
All of this bashing and no substance. In the two years since the Dems recaptured the House they produced a massive stack of legislative bills that Mitch would not let proceed.

Please itemize EXACTLY what you would have done this past four years without Sentate control.

- did you ask me to itemize a list. FOH - i'm union.

so IOW you have no answer about what they could have done that would have satisfied you

forgive me for passing up the opportunity to partake in a political bad faith argument on realgm knicks forum.

Sedale Threatt · Post #1146 » by **Sedale Threatt** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:32 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
Guano wrote:what banned poster is this:

Spoiler:

Read on Twitter

That's a yet to be banned poster whose initials are B.S.B.

His life story:

Read on Twitter

Clyde_Style · Post #1147 » by **Clyde_Style** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:32 am

Guano wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Guano wrote:

- did you ask me to itemize a list. FOH - i'm union.

so IOW you have no answer about what they could have done that would have satisfied you

forgive me for passing up the opportunity to partake in a political bad faith argument on realgm knicks forum.

This is sad. I didn't ask for a list. If you can't even name one thing the Democrats would do that would satisfy you than don't complain the next time someone responds to you with a request for an example when you make a generalized statement without subtance.

Fury · Post #1148 » by **Fury** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:41 am

Read on Twitter

?s=21

Guano · Post #1149 » by **Guano** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:41 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
Guano wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:

so IOW you have no answer about what they could have done that would have satisfied you

forgive me for passing up the opportunity to partake in a political bad faith argument on realgm knicks forum.

This is sad. I didn't ask for a list. If you can't even name one thing the Democrats would do that would satisfy you than don't complain the next time someone responds to you with a request for an example when you make a generalized statement without subtance.

What's really sad is need me to name one thing.

BKlutch · Post #1150 » by **BKlutch** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:46 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
robillionaire wrote:

Read on Twitter

They would have murdered them

Trump's militias are the American ISIS

Sac O' Balls would say Trump is still going to win.

Clyde_Style · Post #1151 » by **Clyde_Style** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 12:51 am

Guano wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Guano wrote:

forgive me for passing up the opportunity to partake in a political bad faith argument on realgm knicks forum.

This is sad. I didn't ask for a list. If you can't even name one thing the Democrats would do that would satisfy you than don't complain the next time someone responds to you with a request for an example when you make a generalized statement without subtance.

What's really sad is need me to name one thing.

This is not the place for you to engage in sloganeering without anything to back it up and then falsely claim someone is gaslighting you when they ask you what the hell you are talking about. You spewed hot air without substance. You're being a real dick

robillionaire · Post #1152 » by **robillionaire** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:17 am

BKlutch wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
robillionaire wrote:

Read on Twitter

They would have murdered them

Trump's militias are the American ISIS

Sac O' Balls would say Trump is still going to win.

I know people who still think Trump will win. Even now.

Clyde_Style · Post #1153 » by **Clyde_Style** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:24 am

robillionaire wrote:
BKlutch wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
They would have murdered them

Trump's militias are the American ISIS

Sac O' Balls would say Trump is still going to win.

I know people who still think Trump will win. Even now.

Pointgod · Post #1154 » by **Pointgod** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:27 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
I’m betting that Manchin is just grandstanding because he knows that there won’t be 60 votes in the Senate to pass the 2000 dollar checks. This is why the Senate needs to get rid of the filibuster so then Manchin really doesn’t have as much power. You can dangle goodies for a single Republican Senator to be the 50th vote. I think people pay too much attention to Manchin.

I hope you're right. There are tricks to subvert the filibuster, so it is possible. I'm no expert, but what I posted about it made it sound like you can create new rule precedents that basically de-fang it.

They'll try and reason with them first and when that doesn't work, then they'll abolish the filibuster. Maybe if we start actually getting things done for regular working class people, these lunatics will calm down.

For what it’s worth he’s already walked back errr clarified his comments. Listen I don’t know why Manchin Manchins but keeping the filibuster is just giving him a built in excuse. I don’t know why people get so worked up over Manchin, assuming they get rid of the filibuster does anyone believe he’s going to be the lone vote holding up a public option?

Read on Twitter

BKlutch · Post #1155 » by **BKlutch** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:31 am

dakomish23 wrote:I can’t. It’s too much.

Read on Twitter

OK, I'll stop complaining about Trump if he'd only do the same.

BKlutch · Post #1156 » by **BKlutch** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:32 am

dakomish23 wrote:I can’t. It’s too much.

Read on Twitter

OK, I'll stop complaining about Trump if he'd only do the same.

Clyde_Style · Post #1157 » by **Clyde_Style** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:32 am

BKlutch wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:I can’t. It’s too much.

Read on Twitter

OK, I'll stop complaining about Trump if he'd only do the same.

Tase The Shroom!

Pointgod · Post #1158 » by **Pointgod** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:33 am

This is absolutely chilling and presents perspective from outside the US

Read on Twitter

3toheadmelo · Post #1159 » by **3toheadmelo** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:34 am

Read on Twitter

Pointgod · Post #1160 » by **Pointgod** » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:37 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
Guano wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
This is sad. I didn't ask for a list. If you can't even name one thing the Democrats would do that would satisfy you than don't complain the next time someone responds to you with a request for an example when you make a generalized statement without subtance.

What's really sad is need me to name one thing.

This is not the place for you to engage in sloganeering without anything to back it up and then falsely claim someone is gaslighting you when they ask you what the hell you are talking about. You spewed hot air without substance. You're being a real dick

He ignores the fact that the Democrats did impeach Trump and there’s another entire party that’s chose to aide and abet him instead of removing him from office you know which would have prevented all we’re seeing now. I swear a lot of posters in this thread don’t even want to discuss politics, they just want to be doom and gloom and complain about Democrats.