Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Moderators: mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
KnixinSix
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,150
- And1: 3,819
- Joined: Jul 27, 2013
- Location: In the Spirit
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
At least this season proved 1 thing....Brunson is an absolute star and clutch player you can build around. Probably best Knicks all around player since Patrick Ewing.
And we've also at this point proved Randle is not an ideal #2. when he is going well he can look absolutely unstoppable and its great bc the low IQ doesn't matter at that point bc he hits many ridiculous shots when he is on like that....however the big moments still too often get in his head and then he does NOT shoot nearly as well and then the low IQ stuff sticks out bc he has no idea how to make good decisions consistently. He becomes an absolute negative in those points.
RJs problem is a bit low IQ in certain situations (but not as bad as Randle). His bigger problem is touch on his shots. And that can be worked on in the offseason. I dont love RJs game (yet but he is still young) but if you trade one of him or Randle and get a true star in the mix...the one left over of JR or RJ become your #3 which wouldnt be as bad.
And we've also at this point proved Randle is not an ideal #2. when he is going well he can look absolutely unstoppable and its great bc the low IQ doesn't matter at that point bc he hits many ridiculous shots when he is on like that....however the big moments still too often get in his head and then he does NOT shoot nearly as well and then the low IQ stuff sticks out bc he has no idea how to make good decisions consistently. He becomes an absolute negative in those points.
RJs problem is a bit low IQ in certain situations (but not as bad as Randle). His bigger problem is touch on his shots. And that can be worked on in the offseason. I dont love RJs game (yet but he is still young) but if you trade one of him or Randle and get a true star in the mix...the one left over of JR or RJ become your #3 which wouldnt be as bad.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
B8RcDeMktfxC
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,633
- And1: 6,435
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
- Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:I'm not really sure that the Knicks want to do a snt deal for Brunson. I guess either side would be happy to have a trade exception, but both sides can't get that.
Maybe the Mavs would like Rose or Fournier??? Probably both sides would be happy to remove the protection on the Mavs 23 pick, or maybe change it to top 3 or whatever.
But I don't see the Knicks wanting Dwight Powell or Bertans. Or Dinwiddie in place of Fournier.
Like thebuzzardman was suggesting, it's hard to see exactly how the Knicks would use a 18m exception in a way that would be more efficient than just keeping Fournier or Rose. Maybe they'd just sit on it until December or this time next year.
The Archidiacano and Taj moves are just what we anticipated. I don't see they signify anything in particular, except keeping the Knicks's options open for a few days.
This did not age well.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
B8RcDeMktfxC
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,633
- And1: 6,435
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
- Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
OTOH: Some you lose, some you win.B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:I'm not reading many articles at the moment/recently so I haven't seen the Brunson hate. But if it exists is extremely misguided. I'm pretty sure I watched every Mavs game last year, maybe missed one or two at the end of the regular season. Brunson's clearly an extremely good player. Frankly, $26m a year for four years is a bargain. He's probably more deserving of s max deal than Garland for example.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
spree2kawhi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,578
- And1: 5,718
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:OTOH: Some you lose, some you win.B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:I'm not reading many articles at the moment/recently so I haven't seen the Brunson hate. But if it exists is extremely misguided. I'm pretty sure I watched every Mavs game last year, maybe missed one or two at the end of the regular season. Brunson's clearly an extremely good player. Frankly, $26m a year for four years is a bargain. He's probably more deserving of s max deal than Garland for example.
Not bad. I’m always cautious if a player excels in a smaller role. Harden was a massive breakout after leaving OKC. Brunson is another. But there are so many players who become more inefficient with increased roles or simply over time - just look at Poole or Simons. Not everybody can back it up and Brunson is not a plus defender. You don’t just overpay these guys.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Jeff Van Gully
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 30,519
- And1: 30,654
- Joined: Jul 31, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
spree2kawhi wrote:B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:OTOH: Some you lose, some you win.B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:I'm not reading many articles at the moment/recently so I haven't seen the Brunson hate. But if it exists is extremely misguided. I'm pretty sure I watched every Mavs game last year, maybe missed one or two at the end of the regular season. Brunson's clearly an extremely good player. Frankly, $26m a year for four years is a bargain. He's probably more deserving of s max deal than Garland for example.
Not bad. I’m always cautious if a player excels in a smaller role. Harden was a massive breakout after leaving OKC. Brunson is another. But there are so many players who become more inefficient with increased roles or simply over time - just look at Poole or Simons. Not everybody can back it up and Brunson is not a plus defender. You don’t just overpay these guys.
those of us who followed brunson saw "it."
RIP magnumt
thanks for everything, thibs.
Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
thanks for everything, thibs.
Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Jeff Van Gully
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 30,519
- And1: 30,654
- Joined: Jul 31, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
phew... reading back on some basura takes.
RIP magnumt
thanks for everything, thibs.
Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
thanks for everything, thibs.
Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- TheGreenArrow
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,609
- And1: 43,113
- Joined: Sep 13, 2017
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
And he has even hit his prime yet(prime for nba players usually 28-32)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He’s going to be soooo much better Folksssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’m talking Mvp Level Good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- E-Balla
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,822
- And1: 25,116
- Joined: Dec 19, 2012
- Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
spree2kawhi wrote:B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:OTOH: Some you lose, some you win.B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:I'm not reading many articles at the moment/recently so I haven't seen the Brunson hate. But if it exists is extremely misguided. I'm pretty sure I watched every Mavs game last year, maybe missed one or two at the end of the regular season. Brunson's clearly an extremely good player. Frankly, $26m a year for four years is a bargain. He's probably more deserving of s max deal than Garland for example.
Not bad. I’m always cautious if a player excels in a smaller role. Harden was a massive breakout after leaving OKC. Brunson is another. But there are so many players who become more inefficient with increased roles or simply over time - just look at Poole or Simons. Not everybody can back it up and Brunson is not a plus defender. You don’t just overpay these guys.
Ignore their numbers, look at how the bench performs that's a much better indicator of the abilities of a bench guard. Brunson literally led the most efficient bench in NBA history in his 2nd season. The numbers may be fugazi, the scoreboard never is. This is also why I'm happy IQ finally got unleashed. He's in that same category of super talented bench guys.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- FrozenEnvelope
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,619
- And1: 4,992
- Joined: Feb 03, 2020
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Jeff Van Gully wrote:phew... reading back on some basura takes.
Hezi needs to retire.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- HarthorneWingo
- RealGM
- Posts: 97,491
- And1: 62,581
- Joined: May 16, 2005
- Location: In Your Head, USA
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
We should sticky this thread given that this was the Knicks most significant offseason move in over 20 years.
Free Palestine
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- HighRyzer83
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,158
- And1: 5,155
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Fan on Fire
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Arguably the most valuable PG in the league right now when you consider efficiency, age, and contract. Who was definitely better this year? Serious question.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
-
Juco24
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,227
- And1: 5,811
- Joined: Feb 12, 2013
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Juggynaut wrote:Jalen Brunson gonna be a star after getting out of Dallas. Just like Steve Nash.
You called it 1st!! Some of these comments though... overpay! LMAO
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
- sol537
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,362
- And1: 7,925
- Joined: Nov 07, 2001
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
cgmw wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:cgmw wrote:Sure but even with Brunson we’re the 14th worst team in the league, so what are we doing signing another non-difference making vet to a $100m contract?
Vet? He's 25 and this was his first season as a starter.
Are you serious rn?
Brunson is a non-rookie contract player who’s now making 20% of the entire salary cap. Brunson + Randle + Fournier = >50% of the entire cap.
Any sane team would never have signed 25 year old veteran Julius Randle after being bad in 2019, just as any sane team would have purged all the veteran contracts to start IQ/Obi in 2022-23.
This is exactly the same thing. It’s the Steve Mills plan. Which was always just the Isiah plan. I like Brunson, but it is what it is and there’s very little hope of competing for championships at any point during the remainder of Brunson’s likely career.
Ouch.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
-
cgmw
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,542
- And1: 10,440
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
sol537 wrote:cgmw wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Vet? He's 25 and this was his first season as a starter.
Are you serious rn?
Brunson is a non-rookie contract player who’s now making 20% of the entire salary cap. Brunson + Randle + Fournier = >50% of the entire cap.
Any sane team would never have signed 25 year old veteran Julius Randle after being bad in 2019, just as any sane team would have purged all the veteran contracts to start IQ/Obi in 2022-23.
This is exactly the same thing. It’s the Steve Mills plan. Which was always just the Isiah plan. I like Brunson, but it is what it is and there’s very little hope of competing for championships at any point during the remainder of Brunson’s likely career.
Ouch.
Hey. Fool me 3x shame on me!
Looked like the same failing strategy as THJ and Randle to me. As I said I liked Brunson, but I’m not afraid to admit I NEVER saw this coming.
Jalen Brunson is a miracle on Earth and I’m as devoted an acolyte as anyone. All praise be to Leon (and by extension Dolan)! That’s right, GOOD JOB JIMMY BOY!
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 90,398
- And1: 110,351
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Bone Goal
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
cgmw wrote:sol537 wrote:cgmw wrote:
Are you serious rn?
Brunson is a non-rookie contract player who’s now making 20% of the entire salary cap. Brunson + Randle + Fournier = >50% of the entire cap.
Any sane team would never have signed 25 year old veteran Julius Randle after being bad in 2019, just as any sane team would have purged all the veteran contracts to start IQ/Obi in 2022-23.
This is exactly the same thing. It’s the Steve Mills plan. Which was always just the Isiah plan. I like Brunson, but it is what it is and there’s very little hope of competing for championships at any point during the remainder of Brunson’s likely career.
Ouch.
Hey. Fool me 3x shame on me!
Looked like the same failing strategy as THJ and Randle to me. As I said I like Brunson, but I’m not afraid to admit I NEVER saw this coming.
Jalen Brunson is a miracle on Earth and I’m as devoted an acolyte as anyone. All praise be to Leon (and by extension Dolan)! That’s right, GOOD JOB JIMMY BOY!
Brunson really is the new Jeter.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Fat Kat
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,028
- And1: 35,906
- Joined: Apr 19, 2004
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
-
Knicksfan1992
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,084
- And1: 14,572
- Joined: Jun 14, 2012
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Knicksfan1992 wrote:I'm pretty happy about this deal all around. We finally don't have to question the pg position going into a season. Brunson's efficiency inside the arc is something fierce for a guy his size and I think there's more to his passing ability than what meets the eye with his basic stats. Thibs also has a history of getting the most out of offense first smaller guards. I think it's a really good match and I hope he exceeds the contract given to him.
Damn I know hoop
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Capn'O wrote:cgmw wrote:sol537 wrote:
Ouch.
Hey. Fool me 3x shame on me!
Looked like the same failing strategy as THJ and Randle to me. As I said I like Brunson, but I’m not afraid to admit I NEVER saw this coming.
Jalen Brunson is a miracle on Earth and I’m as devoted an acolyte as anyone. All praise be to Leon (and by extension Dolan)! That’s right, GOOD JOB JIMMY BOY!
Brunson really is the new Jeter.
This is how you know Jalen Brunson is a superstar.
He made it safe for CGMW to forget about James Dolan and enjoy rooting for the Knicks again.
That's next level.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
- Im Coming Home
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,566
- And1: 20,277
- Joined: Dec 08, 2009
- Location: The Island
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Im Coming Home wrote:I hated his dad on this team... lets hope I like his tenure here.
I ain't that enamored with him like some here, but I will always give a new player a shot to show me what they got. Hopefully Randle will defer and stop trying to be the PG now.

RGM Knicks BAF- Houston Rockets

PG: Cunningham | Small | Ja. Butler
SG: Au. Thompson | Ja. Butler |
SF: B.Ingram | Bullock | LaRavia
PF: Porter Jr. | GG Jackson | Love
C: Jackson Jr. | Eubanks

PG: Cunningham | Small | Ja. Butler
SG: Au. Thompson | Ja. Butler |
SF: B.Ingram | Bullock | LaRavia
PF: Porter Jr. | GG Jackson | Love
C: Jackson Jr. | Eubanks
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 90,398
- And1: 110,351
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Bone Goal
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal
Capn'O wrote:Good player. Good start.

Capn'O was marked safe in the Brunson Signing Thread Bump 2024
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

UNDER CONSTRUCTION














