Knicks leaders for Tyson Chandler??? WOW

Grinditout · Post #1161 » by **Grinditout** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:54 pm

For the guys that wouldn't want Davis, what alternative would you prefer?

iDunk · Post #1162 » by **iDunk** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:54 pm

stuporman wrote:
iDunk wrote:What Davis would lack in defense Shumpert and TD would bring off the bench.

You can't play defense while you are sitting on the bench...enough of these one sided players who you expect to be 'covered from the bench'....

If Baron Davis is getting torched by Rose, Rondo, D-Will, CP3, etc. just bring Iman in. Its pretty simple.

Falstaffxx · Post #1163 » by **Falstaffxx** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:54 pm

Manhattan Project wrote:I mean we all know that you have to overpay for centers in this league, especially one's that have proven that they can actually play. I'm not upset with this contract, just still rather shocked because where did this come from?

We have all clamored to improve our interior defense, team defense, improve on the boards and gain a legit shot blocking presence. Chandler does improve all of these areas, as well as giving us a good rebounder on the offensive end.

I know, it's crazy, right? People have said "why don't we get Chandler?" now and then, but I've always dismissed it as a possibility. It really changes the complexion of the season.

towelie · Post #1164 » by **towelie** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:55 pm

Deeeez Knicks wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
The_Philosopher wrote:Why are people jacking off to Baron Davis at PG? Have any of you ever seen this man play? The guy doesn't play like a PG at all. Jesus, man.

i have serious doubts too man. i'm guessing it won't be for more then this year if it doesn't work.

He'd just be keeping the seat warm until Nash comes.

ROOOOOFL

Post #1165 » by **NoLayupRule** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:55 pm

waya wrote:
The_Philosopher wrote:
stuporman wrote:If you look at it this way... Ty-C starts at $13mil-ish and ends at $15mil-ish.... bad, yeah, but not the worst contract evar.

If I need to compare a contract to the worst contract ever to justify it then it's not a good deal.

What good bigs are there not on a rookie deal who get paid less than 10-12 million? We overpaid a little, but it was something that needed to happen to make us contend.

its impossible to say if we are overpaying as we havent seen the impact.

If Chandler makes us a good interior defensive team, increases Amare's longevity and durability and makes us a good rebounding team is he still overpaid?

SRTtoZ · Post #1166 » by **SRTtoZ** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:56 pm

I'm actually all for this trade as long as Amare isnt traded.

HighRyzer83 · Post #1167 » by **HighRyzer83** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:58 pm

Remember when Steven A Smith screamed the knicks/Dolan would be stupid not to get in on the Chandler sweepstakes yesterday? Dolan jumps. Apparently SAS should be running our team.

Striders · Post #1168 » by **Striders** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:58 pm

@RoundballMiner Jeremy Wagner
I hope Billups goes to MIA to see Bron and Wade react as both are calling for the ball for the final shot then Mr. Big Shot fires a 28' 3.

MSGLegendNY · Post #1169 » by **MSGLegendNY** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:59 pm

STAT better not be put on the trading block for a PG. Replacing Amar'e is harder then replacing a great PG in this era.

The_Philosopher · Post #1170 » by **The_Philosopher** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:59 pm

HighRyzer83 wrote:Remember when Steven A Smith screamed the knicks/Dolan would be stupid not to get in on the Chandler sweepstakes yesterday? Dolan jumps. Apparently SAS should be running our team.

Stephen A is a mouthpiece for Isiah.

Guess who Dolan loves?

perezident · Post #1171 » by **perezident** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:00 pm

I'm hearing about a 3 way between Mavs NY and Sac to get this all done

Phish Tank · Post #1172 » by **Phish Tank** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:00 pm

SRTtoZ wrote:I'm actually all for this trade as long as Amare isnt traded.

I don't even understand why we're even entertaining this discussion.

ibraheim718 · Post #1173 » by **ibraheim718** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:00 pm

Damn... Chandlers two season prior to going to dallas were:

45 GP, 8.8ppg, 1.2BPG and 8.7 RBG

Followed by

51GP, 6.5ppg, 1.1bpg, and 6.3 RBG

14 million per? You damn crazy...

SRTtoZ · Post #1174 » by **SRTtoZ** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:00 pm

Is it REALLY just about done?? Listening to 1050 espn, Michael Kay makes it sound like its a done deal they just need to sign off on it.

disruptv3 · Post #1175 » by **disruptv3** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:01 pm

NoLayupRule wrote:
If Chandler makes us a good interior defensive team, increases Amare's longevity and durability and makes us a good rebounding team is he still overpaid?

great point...

The_Philosopher · Post #1176 » by **The_Philosopher** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:01 pm

ibraheim718 wrote:Damn... Chandlers two season prior to going to dallas were:

45 GP, 8.8ppg, 1.2BPG and 8.7 RBG

Followed by

51GP, 6.5ppg, 1.1bpg, and 6.3 RBG

14 million per? You damn crazy...

Hall of Fame numbers, I tell'ya.

god shammgod · Post #1177 » by **god shammgod** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:01 pm

perezident wrote:I'm hearing about a 3 way between Mavs NY and Sac to get this all done

source ?

disruptv3 · Post #1178 » by **disruptv3** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:01 pm

perezident wrote:I'm hearing about a 3 way between Mavs NY and Sac to get this all done

details?

Michael_Scott · Post #1179 » by **Michael_Scott** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:02 pm

SRTtoZ wrote:Is it REALLY just about done?? Listening to 1050 espn, Michael Kay makes it sound like its a done deal they just need to sign off on it.

Pretty much . We're just waiting on word whether it's a S+T or if we have to Amnesty Chauncey.

Greenie · Post #1180 » by **Greenie** » Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:02 pm

god shammgod wrote:i'd rather keep amare then trade for cp3. hell if we're gonna trade amare why not contact orlando ?

This I rather have.

Dwight
Melo
Paul

Over

Chandler
Melo
Paul