god shammgod wrote:so anything ?
More normal craziness from the board is all.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
god shammgod wrote:so anything ?
KnicksGod wrote:Truth2Power wrote:they didn't offer a decent contract to lin up front.
they chased nash hard.
those are the facts.
They couldn't offer him more than he'd get elsewhere, as he did. Pretty pointless to make him an offer.
Communication could probably have been better from both sides though.
Realmatic wrote:why are people so wrapped up on the business aspect of the lin matter. What matter is who gives you a better shot at winning and most will agree and say Lin will impact the team better
Red Vines wrote:Hmmmm:Jeremy Lin No Longer Benefits MSG Stock, Gamco’s Marangi Says
Gamco Investors (GBL) Inc., Madison Square Garden Co. (MSG)’s third-largest shareholder, has a “sell” rating on Jeremy Lin.
The National Basketball Association’s New York Knicks, owned by MSG, should allow the 23-year-old point guard to go to the Houston Rockets because his contract overvalues him, Chris Marangi, a portfolio manager at Rye, New York-based Gamco, said in a telephone interview.
New York can keep Lin by matching Houston’s three-year, $25.1 million offer. The third year of the deal would be worth $14.8 million, nearly three times higher than the average NBA salary. The signing of veteran Jason Kidd and the trade that brought Raymond Felton back to the team indicate the Knicks may be planning for a future without the Harvard University graduate.
“We like it when companies shop for bargains, and Ray Felton looks like a bargain compared to Jeremy Lin,” Marangi said. “We’re value investors.”
. . .
The TV rights deal will be Lin’s biggest effect on the Knicks, even if the team signs him to a new contract, Tullo said. Cable and satellite-TV operators pay more than $4.50 a month per subscriber for MSG and MSG Plus, according to researcher SNL Kagan.
“The benefit of Linsanity was manifested in the Time Warner Cable affiliate agreement that’s providing the team with an annuity in the future, and the Knicks have already received that benefit,” Tullo said.
Read the rest: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-1 ... -says.html
Fury wrote:21shumpst wrote:
If Copeland plays 6 min a game, we are not making the playoffs.
12 mins for KT till Shump comes back

Suns2k5 wrote:GONYK wrote:Anybody who thinks Lin prefers the Rockets to the Knicks are plain wrong. Everyone is Houston knows Lin is hoping the Knicks match
Why did he sign a contract HE knew the knicks would have a hard time matching? You guys act like the knicks are the lakers or celtics when infact they are more like the east coast clippers. They are what they are, slightly over 500, barely making the playoffs and getting blown out in the first round.
Falstaffxx wrote:JBreezeNY wrote:
Whatever happens, happens we're trying to win a chip if Lin comes back to help us with that then cool. If Lin doesn't come back cool we'll try with Felton & Kidd.
You make it sound as if this is Lin's choice. "If Lin comes back." All we need is the rich owner to shell out the kinds of dollars he paid for Eddy Curry and lawsuits. Letting a key player go doesn't constitute, "trying to win a championship." It constitutes an f u to the fans and Dolan valuing his ego over the team.

21shumpst wrote:Red Vines wrote:Hmmmm:Jeremy Lin No Longer Benefits MSG Stock, Gamco’s Marangi Says
Gamco Investors (GBL) Inc., Madison Square Garden Co. (MSG)’s third-largest shareholder, has a “sell” rating on Jeremy Lin.
The National Basketball Association’s New York Knicks, owned by MSG, should allow the 23-year-old point guard to go to the Houston Rockets because his contract overvalues him, Chris Marangi, a portfolio manager at Rye, New York-based Gamco, said in a telephone interview.
New York can keep Lin by matching Houston’s three-year, $25.1 million offer. The third year of the deal would be worth $14.8 million, nearly three times higher than the average NBA salary. The signing of veteran Jason Kidd and the trade that brought Raymond Felton back to the team indicate the Knicks may be planning for a future without the Harvard University graduate.
“We like it when companies shop for bargains, and Ray Felton looks like a bargain compared to Jeremy Lin,” Marangi said. “We’re value investors.”
. . .
The TV rights deal will be Lin’s biggest effect on the Knicks, even if the team signs him to a new contract, Tullo said. Cable and satellite-TV operators pay more than $4.50 a month per subscriber for MSG and MSG Plus, according to researcher SNL Kagan.
“The benefit of Linsanity was manifested in the Time Warner Cable affiliate agreement that’s providing the team with an annuity in the future, and the Knicks have already received that benefit,” Tullo said.
Read the rest: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-1 ... -says.html
This guy has obviously never seen a basketball game in his life.
Red Vines wrote:Realmatic wrote:why are people so wrapped up on the business aspect of the lin matter. What matter is who gives you a better shot at winning and most will agree and say Lin will impact the team better
Henry Abbott @TrueHoop
Wall Streeters say Felton better value than Jeremy Lin, which is debatable, but matters 'cause they advise Dolan
Red Vines wrote:Realmatic wrote:why are people so wrapped up on the business aspect of the lin matter. What matter is who gives you a better shot at winning and most will agree and say Lin will impact the team better
Henry Abbott @TrueHoop
Wall Streeters say Felton better value than Jeremy Lin, which is debatable, but matters 'cause they advise Dolan

unabashedFan wrote:KnicksGod wrote:Truth2Power wrote:they didn't offer a decent contract to lin up front.
they chased nash hard.
those are the facts.
They couldn't offer him more than he'd get elsewhere, as he did. Pretty pointless to make him an offer.
Communication could probably have been better from both sides though.
Weak sauce. They made it look like they were willing and able to match any offers hence the directive to ask Lin to seek his market value. Ok well 3 years $25M is his market value so where's the match?? It's a lie. Knicks fans have been lied to about the Knicks FO wanting to match Lin's contract. They were probably hoping for a 3 year $10M offer for Lin. LOL.
JayKnicKz11 wrote:I mean that gif does sum it up pretty well. It should never be serious that a player leaving, leaves you distraught. This is the NBA where players get traded all the time & players go to different teams all the time.
Whatever happens, happens we're trying to win a chip if Lin comes back to help us with that then cool. If Lin doesn't come back cool we'll try with Felton & Kidd.
Red Vines wrote:Hmmmm:Jeremy Lin No Longer Benefits MSG Stock, Gamco’s Marangi Says
Gamco Investors (GBL) Inc., Madison Square Garden Co. (MSG)’s third-largest shareholder, has a “sell” rating on Jeremy Lin.
The National Basketball Association’s New York Knicks, owned by MSG, should allow the 23-year-old point guard to go to the Houston Rockets because his contract overvalues him, Chris Marangi, a portfolio manager at Rye, New York-based Gamco, said in a telephone interview.
New York can keep Lin by matching Houston’s three-year, $25.1 million offer. The third year of the deal would be worth $14.8 million, nearly three times higher than the average NBA salary. The signing of veteran Jason Kidd and the trade that brought Raymond Felton back to the team indicate the Knicks may be planning for a future without the Harvard University graduate.
“We like it when companies shop for bargains, and Ray Felton looks like a bargain compared to Jeremy Lin,” Marangi said. “We’re value investors.”
. . .
The TV rights deal will be Lin’s biggest effect on the Knicks, even if the team signs him to a new contract, Tullo said. Cable and satellite-TV operators pay more than $4.50 a month per subscriber for MSG and MSG Plus, according to researcher SNL Kagan.
“The benefit of Linsanity was manifested in the Time Warner Cable affiliate agreement that’s providing the team with an annuity in the future, and the Knicks have already received that benefit,” Tullo said.
Read the rest: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-1 ... -says.html
Red Vines wrote:Realmatic wrote:why are people so wrapped up on the business aspect of the lin matter. What matter is who gives you a better shot at winning and most will agree and say Lin will impact the team better
Henry Abbott @TrueHoop
Wall Streeters say Felton better value than Jeremy Lin, which is debatable, but matters 'cause they advise Dolan
JBreezeNY wrote:I mean that gif does sum it up pretty well. It should never be serious that a player leaving, leaves you distraught. This is the NBA where players get traded all the time & players go to different teams all the time.
Whatever happens, happens we're trying to win a chip if Lin comes back to help us with that then cool. If Lin doesn't come back cool we'll try with Felton & Kidd.