Billy Goat wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Billy Goat wrote:
Melos contract is probably the worst in the NBA when you factor in the no trade. He literally can't be traded and is due 50 million over two years.
Noah at 4 years 70 mill is the same exact contract evan turner got. He's moveable.
Melo can be traded. He just has a choice who it is to. Melo will have suitors. You don't need to add an incentive for him to be traded.
Noah can be traded. Noah has no choice who it is to. Noah will not have suitors. You have to throw a really good asset to dump Noah at this point.
His NTC ≠ impossible to get someone to trade for him.
Better put
We put them side by side
Melo on 2 years left
Noah on 3 years left
What is every GM in the world choosing except the egomaniac running our office?
Would you like to make a bet on Melo being traded? When we talk about Knicks fans being the most delusional in NY, Melo's trade value is probably the biggest indicator. He has no value because of the no trade clause.
Delusional?

Delusional is thinking his trade value would be high after the way PJax handled the situation. If I'm desperate to dump something, guess what? A buyer knows that and will not overpay for it - unless you're the Knicks (see Bargs trade).
Delusional is thinking what you settle for in a deal is an indicator of the actual value of the player. PJax has gotten fleeced multiple times. See Chandler and Shump deals, where he used guys with value just to dump salary, just to sign a guy that he would trade a year later in another salary dump (on one of the guys he traded for in the Chandler deal), only to sign the worst contract in the NBA.
Delusional is thinking his contract is the worst in the NBA. Which you stated and have yet to make a convincing argument for.
Answer the question. 29 GMs lined up. They have a choice - Melo on 2 years, Joakim on 3. Who are they taking?