Jeff Van Gully wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
Look at Carlos Mendoza for the Mets. A young guy more open to data but still has a good feel of the players but is an extension of Stearns and the FO. I'm sure our built out analytical team was frustrated we played like Deuce with the starters less Hart for like 80 minutes all year...like zero sample size for a true 5-out lineup.
More experimenting in the regular season to see different lineup combinations and contributions from everyone.
Right. Mendoza is awesome. Smart. Born in the last 45 years.
The analytics team was probably screaming about the starters playing 700 more mins than other teams starters across the league. I feel like they were ignored entirely.
I'm warming up to the idea of Bryant to be honest.
i don't know enough about bryant's coaching strategy/principles, but it's probably more modern than thibs. the recent videos shared still showed a LOT of read and react, which is player-dependent and frankly thibslamic. but i did see a lot more emphasis on player movement, which LEADS to ball movement. i do love that. even as a thibs fan, i hated seeing guys so stationary in the sets. even if the ball isn't moving that much, player movement creates opportunity in the set defenses. if JB can get them to move and trust, i'd be happy to see it.
what i do know about JB is that he's seen as a stabilizing force in relationships and communication. that excites me. even if thibs had good ideas he couldn't get the players to execute, that matters. i've been vocal about that too even as a thibs fan.
bryant knowing the team so well would give me a lot of peace in this process. and i'd hope he brings us all we need to be better.
Adding Mo Cheeks to the coaching staff an early indication that Knicks were looking to move on from Thibs and might pivot to Bryant.
Because the wise old head guy not directly affiliated with Thibs is already present to be his asst coach.
Just a thought.