Oscirus wrote:so to sum it up, the knicks have had less game winners over the past decade than derozen had in back to back games?
In all fairness you have to actually be close at the end of games to have a game winner
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully
Oscirus wrote:so to sum it up, the knicks have had less game winners over the past decade than derozen had in back to back games?

Jimmit79 wrote:I think if Leon offered RJ for SGA now at least presti won't laugh and hang up asap.
Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk

knickstape4ever wrote:Rowan Alexander Barrett!
gotta feel for the Celtics, they got so much talent but are so poorly coached. couldn't believe they hired Ime, who lost this game for them by not challenging the out of bounds call

BugginOut wrote:Maybe this is the game that gets Fournier going. Wins like this will take a lot of the heat off of him that he was getting in the media. He can start playing with swag again

EnigmatiC wrote:Oscirus wrote:so to sum it up, the knicks have had less game winners over the past decade than derozen had in back to back games?
In all fairness you have to actually be close at the end of games to have a game winner
EnigmatiC wrote:I turned it off down 20 in the 3rd. You’re welcome


RHODEY wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Will the real Knicks team please stand up?
Will the anti-RJ contingent sit down?
It's headed for portland cya.Zenzibar wrote:For all you RJ haters, no room on the RJ Express.

jvsimonetti0514 wrote:RJ may have shot terrible all night outside of the last shot but let's not overlook the oop to Mitch and that kick out to IQ that gave us the lead late in the 4th. Just an absolutely amazing game.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
BugginOut wrote:Maybe this is the game that gets Fournier going. Wins like this will take a lot of the heat off of him that he was getting in the media. He can start playing with swag again