Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,985
- And1: 746
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Marble Garden Zone
-
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
That plus OG Anunoby might get it done. OG Anunoby & Mikal Bridges = Hell No.
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
- Iron Mantis
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,046
- And1: 27,706
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
Bojan Bogdanovic????????????????

Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,143
- And1: 5,356
- Joined: Jun 04, 2005
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
do we even have 4 unprotected picks to trade?
honestly, just waiting to see how OKC performs and whether they win the championship. They have so many picks that they could trade for Giannis without giving up SGA, Chet, or Jalen Williams
honestly, just waiting to see how OKC performs and whether they win the championship. They have so many picks that they could trade for Giannis without giving up SGA, Chet, or Jalen Williams
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
- K_ick_God
- Site Admin
- Posts: 80,879
- And1: 43,335
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
-
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
- K_ick_God
- Site Admin
- Posts: 80,879
- And1: 43,335
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
-
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
ctorres wrote:do we even have 4 unprotected picks to trade?
honestly, just waiting to see how OKC performs and whether they win the championship. They have so many picks that they could trade for Giannis without giving up SGA, Chet, or Jalen Williams
We have zero
https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/future_drafts/tradeable
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,342
- And1: 5,691
- Joined: Jul 21, 2001
- Location: East of West and West of East.
- Contact:
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
KnicksGod wrote:ctorres wrote:do we even have 4 unprotected picks to trade?
honestly, just waiting to see how OKC performs and whether they win the championship. They have so many picks that they could trade for Giannis without giving up SGA, Chet, or Jalen Williams
We have zero
https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/future_drafts/tradeable
They have the Wiz pick, which, unless the Wiz suddenly start winning more games, will turn into a 2nd rounder. But yeah, that's it.
Trump is going after Harvard, because he hates the educated. What Trump doesn't realize is that Harvard is here to stay and he is not. 20 years from now, Harvard will be a top university, while Trump will just be a stain on American history.
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
- Context
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,486
- And1: 21,829
- Joined: Jul 06, 2005
- Location: where the Gods dwell! shhhhhhh
-
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
The knicks have a bigger coaching problem than a "player" problem. Some of you ever heard the term putting a person in a position to fail or succeed?

Luka | Conley | Delon W.
Suggs | Bane | Naw
Eason | Barnes | Naji
AD | Barnes | Eason
Mitch R. | Claxton | Jemison
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
- TKKnicks1
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,540
- And1: 5,818
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
- Location: Dallas
-
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
Fire Thibs. Hire J Bryant.
Trade 1 - Mikal, Mitch and Deuce for Devin Booker
Trade 2 - KAT and Hart for Giannis and Kuzma
Huka
Giannis
OG
Booker
Brunson
Sign some free agents for the bench to play with Kuzma, Kolek and Dadiet.
Trade 1 - Mikal, Mitch and Deuce for Devin Booker
Trade 2 - KAT and Hart for Giannis and Kuzma
Huka
Giannis
OG
Booker
Brunson
Sign some free agents for the bench to play with Kuzma, Kolek and Dadiet.
Fire Thibs!
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,309
- And1: 5,531
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
kNicksGmen wrote:Warning - this is a hindsight what if.
random thought... how does this team look if they traded for butler instead of bridges? and then maybe mitch/deuce/precious?/filler for sexton and kessler. Not sure how the salary could have worked in either trades (or maybe it's one big 3-4 team deal?) so maybe not realistic to keep everyone I think. Butler's cost was prob a lot higher in the offseason also and knicks didn't want to "wait".
Brunson
Butler
OG
Randle
Kessler
Divo
Sexton
Hart?
Vet big or Huk
I've been a butler hater but hard to deny how much he impacts a team outside of his own counting stats, especially in the playoffs. that team has 3 advantage creators in brunson, butler and randle - and can let brunson play more off ball. kessler gives thibs the rim defense he needs and your only bad defender is Brunson (randle has played good defense this year especially the playoffs). Team is also huge 2-5
Not sure if those trades are possible without giving up Divo/Hart - though I would be fine including hart in the butler trade. Would then need to fill out the roster a bit especially a backup C if Mitch was traded.
But i think that team could have competed with the best teams this year.
This is like me saying what if, in hindsight, we had this team:
Kessler / Towns
Towns / OG / Achiuwa
OG / Hart /Bridges
Bridges / Hart / Sexton
Brunson / Sexton
Also don’t forget that Butler just went 2/10 with 8 points in the loss and averaged 30.8 3P% over the entire season. He was never available and Miami projected to be a much better team when we made the trade for Bridges. I’ve mentioned before that Butler makes twice the salary Bridges makes, and this is just not what we should be doing. Bridges has been solid. I get it, 5 picks and all, but he’s been covering for all our players defensively this postseason and we should simply roll with him now instead of this nonsense.
Look, literally in their respective last games…
Herro went 1-10,
KCP 2-9,
Derrick White 2-6,
Jimmy Butler 2-10,
McDaniels 2-4,
DDV 3-13,
NAW 3-11,
Jalen Green 3-8,
and Podziemski 3-7 …
… from the field to name just some somewhat comparable names in this context.
They’re all really nice players, no doubt, but my point is you guys bring them up to bash our guy and cry when they have good games and compare that to his bad ones. It’s always an uphill battle, and I know we gave up all those picks, but I’m here to tell you their grass isn’t always greener and Butler makes 48 million compared to Bridge’s 24. It’s apples and oranges and it was never a thing in the first place.
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,224
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: Aug 03, 2021
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
spree2kawhi wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:Warning - this is a hindsight what if.
random thought... how does this team look if they traded for butler instead of bridges? and then maybe mitch/deuce/precious?/filler for sexton and kessler. Not sure how the salary could have worked in either trades (or maybe it's one big 3-4 team deal?) so maybe not realistic to keep everyone I think. Butler's cost was prob a lot higher in the offseason also and knicks didn't want to "wait".
Brunson
Butler
OG
Randle
Kessler
Divo
Sexton
Hart?
Vet big or Huk
I've been a butler hater but hard to deny how much he impacts a team outside of his own counting stats, especially in the playoffs. that team has 3 advantage creators in brunson, butler and randle - and can let brunson play more off ball. kessler gives thibs the rim defense he needs and your only bad defender is Brunson (randle has played good defense this year especially the playoffs). Team is also huge 2-5
Not sure if those trades are possible without giving up Divo/Hart - though I would be fine including hart in the butler trade. Would then need to fill out the roster a bit especially a backup C if Mitch was traded.
But i think that team could have competed with the best teams this year.
This is like me saying what if, in hindsight, we had this team:
Kessler / Towns
Towns / OG / Achiuwa
OG / Hart /Bridges
Bridges / Hart / Sexton
Brunson / Sexton
Also don’t forget that Butler just went 2/10 with 8 points in the loss and averaged 30.8 3P% over the entire season. He was never available and Miami projected to be a much better team when we made the trade for Bridges. I’ve mentioned before that Butler makes twice the salary Bridges makes, and this is just not what we should be doing. Bridges has been solid. I get it, 5 picks and all, but he’s been covering for all our players defensively this postseason and we should simply roll with him now instead of this nonsense.
Look, literally in their respective last games…
Herro went 1-10,
KCP 2-9,
Derrick White 2-6,
Jimmy Butler 2-10,
McDaniels 2-4,
DDV 3-13,
NAW 3-11,
Jalen Green 3-8,
and Podziemski 3-7 …
… from the field to name just some somewhat comparable names in this context.
They’re all really nice players, no doubt, but my point is you guys bring them up to bash our guy and cry when they have good games and compare that to his bad ones. It’s always an uphill battle, and I know we gave up all those picks, but I’m here to tell you their grass isn’t always greener and Butler makes 48 million compared to Bridge’s 24. It’s apples and oranges and it was never a thing in the first place.
See Spree, all your points being fair and rational but I think one thing that really irks people (next to giving up that completely insane price for Bridges) is that he projects close to zero toughness. I personally will say that I think his defense is usually solid and has been a bit overcriticized throughout the season but how do you explain him never drawing ANY contact whatsoever. When a lane opens and he is about to take off and go for a dunk or layup and some defender shows up, he stops and takes a fade away midrange or passes it off. It is highly irritating to me. Like he avoids any physiciality whatsoever. Whenever Cade has him in a one-on-one situation he goes immediately into the post and creates a good shot for himself. This is a guy that at some point during the season shot like 8 Free throws in an entire MONTH. It is the opposite from what you want to see. And then you have all the problems with his shot. He essentially can't make any 3pointer other than corner threes. He project no toughness, no grit ...just nothing.
That to me is the biggest difference to those players you listed. They will play with a lot of grit, toughness, intangibles. Everyone in the NBA has off shooting nights--even Curry-- but it is many other things you do on the court. He is supposed to be a wingstop but watch closely how opposing star players play him. They truly relish whenever he gets switched on them. They love playing him one on one. Ask Cade, ask Tatum etc.
The trade has been an unmitigated desaster. And due to the historic, insane price the FO paid, it will be difficult to not extend him or even trade him for better fitting pieces. Bridges holds all the leverage here and trading him in the offseason is going to make the FO look like complete idiots so in all likelihood we are stuck with his soft play here. I'm already hearing that the Knicks may look at trading Mitch and/or OG in the offseason if they decide they need a major roster shake-up. I REALLY REALLY hope this is just bs rumors. If they trade OG I would stop any support for the FO and Leon. He had a historically bad offseason---probably one of the worst of the past decade but he has earned the right to right this ship---starting with an immediate firing of Thibs. An OG trade would be only to save their own face but desastrous for the team. And Mitch alone won't garner a big haul and we have no picks so we are boxed in a corner.
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,309
- And1: 5,531
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
HopelessKnick wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:Warning - this is a hindsight what if.
random thought... how does this team look if they traded for butler instead of bridges? and then maybe mitch/deuce/precious?/filler for sexton and kessler. Not sure how the salary could have worked in either trades (or maybe it's one big 3-4 team deal?) so maybe not realistic to keep everyone I think. Butler's cost was prob a lot higher in the offseason also and knicks didn't want to "wait".
Brunson
Butler
OG
Randle
Kessler
Divo
Sexton
Hart?
Vet big or Huk
I've been a butler hater but hard to deny how much he impacts a team outside of his own counting stats, especially in the playoffs. that team has 3 advantage creators in brunson, butler and randle - and can let brunson play more off ball. kessler gives thibs the rim defense he needs and your only bad defender is Brunson (randle has played good defense this year especially the playoffs). Team is also huge 2-5
Not sure if those trades are possible without giving up Divo/Hart - though I would be fine including hart in the butler trade. Would then need to fill out the roster a bit especially a backup C if Mitch was traded.
But i think that team could have competed with the best teams this year.
This is like me saying what if, in hindsight, we had this team:
Kessler / Towns
Towns / OG / Achiuwa
OG / Hart /Bridges
Bridges / Hart / Sexton
Brunson / Sexton
Also don’t forget that Butler just went 2/10 with 8 points in the loss and averaged 30.8 3P% over the entire season. He was never available and Miami projected to be a much better team when we made the trade for Bridges. I’ve mentioned before that Butler makes twice the salary Bridges makes, and this is just not what we should be doing. Bridges has been solid. I get it, 5 picks and all, but he’s been covering for all our players defensively this postseason and we should simply roll with him now instead of this nonsense.
Look, literally in their respective last games…
Herro went 1-10,
KCP 2-9,
Derrick White 2-6,
Jimmy Butler 2-10,
McDaniels 2-4,
DDV 3-13,
NAW 3-11,
Jalen Green 3-8,
and Podziemski 3-7 …
… from the field to name just some somewhat comparable names in this context.
They’re all really nice players, no doubt, but my point is you guys bring them up to bash our guy and cry when they have good games and compare that to his bad ones. It’s always an uphill battle, and I know we gave up all those picks, but I’m here to tell you their grass isn’t always greener and Butler makes 48 million compared to Bridge’s 24. It’s apples and oranges and it was never a thing in the first place.
See Spree, all your points being fair and rational but I think one thing that really irks people (next to giving up that completely insane price for Bridges) is that he projects close to zero toughness. I personally will say that I think his defense is usually solid and has been a bit overcriticized throughout the season but how do you explain him never drawing ANY contact whatsoever. When a lane opens and he is about to take off and go for a dunk or layup and some defender shows up, he stops and takes a fade away midrange or passes it off. It is highly irritating to me. Like he avoids any physiciality whatsoever. Whenever Cade has him in a one-on-one situation he goes immediately into the post and creates a good shot for himself. This is a guy that at some point during the season shot like 8 Free throws in an entire MONTH. It is the opposite from what you want to see. And then you have all the problems with his shot. He essentially can't make any 3pointer other than corner threes. He project no toughness, no grit ...just nothing.
That to me is the biggest difference to those players you listed. They will play with a lot of grit, toughness, intangibles. Everyone in the NBA has off shooting nights--even Curry-- but it is many other things you do on the court. He is supposed to be a wingstop but watch closely how opposing star players play him. They truly relish whenever he gets switched on them. They love playing him one on one. Ask Cade, ask Tatum etc.
The trade has been an unmitigated desaster. And due to the historic, insane price the FO paid, it will be difficult to not extend him or even trade him for better fitting pieces. Bridges holds all the leverage here and trading him in the offseason is going to make the FO look like complete idiots so in all likelihood we are stuck with his soft play here. I'm already hearing that the Knicks may look at trading Mitch and/or OG in the offseason if they decide they need a major roster shake-up. I REALLY REALLY hope this is just bs rumors. If they trade OG I would stop any support for the FO and Leon. He had a historically bad offseason---probably one of the worst of the past decade but he has earned the right to right this ship---starting with an immediate firing of Thibs. An OG trade would be only to save their own face but desastrous for the team. And Mitch alone won't garner a big haul and we have no picks so we are boxed in a corner.
You’re right as far as physicality is concerned and I have eyes too, but…

If he brought everything else you criticize him for, like a more physical build and playing style with even better outside shooting, we’re talking about Kawhi Leonard all of a sudden. No butler also doesn’t provide all that, and again he is better than bridges, but paid twice as much. He is a role player and those intangibles at that type of level have a price too. I’m content with that and I think it’s a level-headed view.
As for OG. He’s certainly more physical and the better player overall, but I want both. Plus, OG will disappear too, and get a pass. OG is untouchable in my book, to be very clear, and Bridges isn’t.
Look, ultimately, I get the criticism, but I’m looking at the positives. Currently, I’m not surprised when he misses the shot, I’m relieved when he makes it. But to be fair, it was the same with Randle for years, and at least Bridges plays under control all the time. He’ll step it up, too. I’m rooting for him.
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,851
- And1: 5,950
- Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
sol537 wrote:KAT + Bridges for Giannis + Portis Jr.
Who says no?
How about this 3 team trade as a baseline:
NY: Giannis and KCP along with Pick #26 from Orlando
Orlando: Bridges
Milwaukee: KAT, Pick #16 (via Orlando) and a 2026 first from Orlando (2nd best of Orl/Phx/Was)
Depending on what PHX can get for Durant in a separate trade, I could see KAT being re-routed to PHX with the stuff they get for Durant going back to Mil. With this logic, I can see MIL having a gap year next year, ending up with a likely lotto pick (lessor of MIL/NO), and entering the summer of 2026 with only Lillard and the young pieces they get back from Giannis on the roster.
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,851
- And1: 5,950
- Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
Bridges might be entering Bobby Bonilla territory for Knicks fans given the price they paid to acquire him vs the kind of player he is.
The Knicks thought they were getting a poor man’s Jaylen Brown and ended up with a rich man’s KCP
The Knicks thought they were getting a poor man’s Jaylen Brown and ended up with a rich man’s KCP
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,687
- And1: 2,173
- Joined: Jun 24, 2011
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
spree2kawhi wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:Warning - this is a hindsight what if.
random thought... how does this team look if they traded for butler instead of bridges? and then maybe mitch/deuce/precious?/filler for sexton and kessler. Not sure how the salary could have worked in either trades (or maybe it's one big 3-4 team deal?) so maybe not realistic to keep everyone I think. Butler's cost was prob a lot higher in the offseason also and knicks didn't want to "wait".
Brunson
Butler
OG
Randle
Kessler
Divo
Sexton
Hart?
Vet big or Huk
I've been a butler hater but hard to deny how much he impacts a team outside of his own counting stats, especially in the playoffs. that team has 3 advantage creators in brunson, butler and randle - and can let brunson play more off ball. kessler gives thibs the rim defense he needs and your only bad defender is Brunson (randle has played good defense this year especially the playoffs). Team is also huge 2-5
Not sure if those trades are possible without giving up Divo/Hart - though I would be fine including hart in the butler trade. Would then need to fill out the roster a bit especially a backup C if Mitch was traded.
But i think that team could have competed with the best teams this year.
This is like me saying what if, in hindsight, we had this team:
Kessler / Towns
Towns / OG / Achiuwa
OG / Hart /Bridges
Bridges / Hart / Sexton
Brunson / Sexton
Also don’t forget that Butler just went 2/10 with 8 points in the loss and averaged 30.8 3P% over the entire season. He was never available and Miami projected to be a much better team when we made the trade for Bridges. I’ve mentioned before that Butler makes twice the salary Bridges makes, and this is just not what we should be doing. Bridges has been solid. I get it, 5 picks and all, but he’s been covering for all our players defensively this postseason and we should simply roll with him now instead of this nonsense.
Look, literally in their respective last games…
Herro went 1-10,
KCP 2-9,
Derrick White 2-6,
Jimmy Butler 2-10,
McDaniels 2-4,
DDV 3-13,
NAW 3-11,
Jalen Green 3-8,
and Podziemski 3-7 …
… from the field to name just some somewhat comparable names in this context.
They’re all really nice players, no doubt, but my point is you guys bring them up to bash our guy and cry when they have good games and compare that to his bad ones. It’s always an uphill battle, and I know we gave up all those picks, but I’m here to tell you their grass isn’t always greener and Butler makes 48 million compared to Bridge’s 24. It’s apples and oranges and it was never a thing in the first place.
The thought experiment wasn't intended to crap on Bridges as much as a realization of how good Butler is and how cheap the warriors got him. Obviously hindsight and timing wouldn't have worked the same for the knicks. It's also just a feeling of butler's skill set is something the knicks desperately need.
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,309
- And1: 5,531
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
kNicksGmen wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:Warning - this is a hindsight what if.
random thought... how does this team look if they traded for butler instead of bridges? and then maybe mitch/deuce/precious?/filler for sexton and kessler. Not sure how the salary could have worked in either trades (or maybe it's one big 3-4 team deal?) so maybe not realistic to keep everyone I think. Butler's cost was prob a lot higher in the offseason also and knicks didn't want to "wait".
Brunson
Butler
OG
Randle
Kessler
Divo
Sexton
Hart?
Vet big or Huk
I've been a butler hater but hard to deny how much he impacts a team outside of his own counting stats, especially in the playoffs. that team has 3 advantage creators in brunson, butler and randle - and can let brunson play more off ball. kessler gives thibs the rim defense he needs and your only bad defender is Brunson (randle has played good defense this year especially the playoffs). Team is also huge 2-5
Not sure if those trades are possible without giving up Divo/Hart - though I would be fine including hart in the butler trade. Would then need to fill out the roster a bit especially a backup C if Mitch was traded.
But i think that team could have competed with the best teams this year.
This is like me saying what if, in hindsight, we had this team:
Kessler / Towns
Towns / OG / Achiuwa
OG / Hart /Bridges
Bridges / Hart / Sexton
Brunson / Sexton
Also don’t forget that Butler just went 2/10 with 8 points in the loss and averaged 30.8 3P% over the entire season. He was never available and Miami projected to be a much better team when we made the trade for Bridges. I’ve mentioned before that Butler makes twice the salary Bridges makes, and this is just not what we should be doing. Bridges has been solid. I get it, 5 picks and all, but he’s been covering for all our players defensively this postseason and we should simply roll with him now instead of this nonsense.
Look, literally in their respective last games…
Herro went 1-10,
KCP 2-9,
Derrick White 2-6,
Jimmy Butler 2-10,
McDaniels 2-4,
DDV 3-13,
NAW 3-11,
Jalen Green 3-8,
and Podziemski 3-7 …
… from the field to name just some somewhat comparable names in this context.
They’re all really nice players, no doubt, but my point is you guys bring them up to bash our guy and cry when they have good games and compare that to his bad ones. It’s always an uphill battle, and I know we gave up all those picks, but I’m here to tell you their grass isn’t always greener and Butler makes 48 million compared to Bridge’s 24. It’s apples and oranges and it was never a thing in the first place.
The thought experiment wasn't intended to crap on Bridges as much as a realization of how good Butler is and how cheap the warriors got him. Obviously hindsight and timing wouldn't have worked the same for the knicks. It's also just a feeling of butler's skill set is something the knicks desperately need.
He is one of a kind and Bridges doesn’t have that. I agree.
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,309
- And1: 5,531
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
ctorres wrote:do we even have 4 unprotected picks to trade?
honestly, just waiting to see how OKC performs and whether they win the championship. They have so many picks that they could trade for Giannis without giving up SGA, Chet, or Jalen Williams
They’ll get him if he agrees and if they agree to trade Holmgren, don’t you think? I wouldn’t hesitate if I was them.
But I do think it’s more likely they’ll convince Durant and he’ll bite in order to alter his suspect legacy.
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,143
- And1: 5,356
- Joined: Jun 04, 2005
Re: Can the Knicks get Giannis for 4 unprotected 1st round picks, swap & Bojan Bogdanovic & a lil bit more?
spree2kawhi wrote:ctorres wrote:do we even have 4 unprotected picks to trade?
honestly, just waiting to see how OKC performs and whether they win the championship. They have so many picks that they could trade for Giannis without giving up SGA, Chet, or Jalen Williams
They’ll get him if he agrees and if they agree to trade Holmgren, don’t you think? I wouldn’t hesitate if I was them.
But I do think it’s more likely they’ll convince Durant and he’ll bite in order to alter his suspect legacy.
I think it would be Hartenstein, Dort, and a pick haul for Giannis
Giannis makes $49 million
Hartenstein makes $30 million and Dort makes $17 million. One of the two has to be included in the deal to make the salaries work. If Hartenstein is not included, then I'd see Dort, Holmgren, and some other contracts.
It seems like the most picks OKC can send out in a trade is 6 1st round picks along with two swaps. I thought they had more picks but I guess not.
Same with Brooklyn, they can send out 6 1st round picks along with two swaps for GIannis. It seems Brooklyn would also need to include Nic Claxton and Cam Johnson to make the salaries work. I thought Brooklyn could just absorb Giannis with cap room. Maybe they can, but it's not up to date on Spotrac, I don't know.
I didn't realize the Spurs had the most attractive package. They can send 8 1st round picks and have contracts to match Giannis. I think we see Giannis and Wemby team up.
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
- sol537
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,117
- And1: 7,660
- Joined: Nov 07, 2001
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
Bucks would need one of Chet or Williams along with a boat load of picks for Giannis.
Spurs have a great package of ROY Castle, Vassel, Barnes, and picks. If I were the Spurs, I would give this heavy consideration because Wemby, Giannis, and Fox can get you at least one title IMO.
Our offer would be something like KAT + Mikal for Giannis + Portis. Maybe we toss in Deuce.
It all depends on what MIL is looking for and where Giannis really wants to go. I think MIL will send him to his preferred destination.
Spurs have a great package of ROY Castle, Vassel, Barnes, and picks. If I were the Spurs, I would give this heavy consideration because Wemby, Giannis, and Fox can get you at least one title IMO.
Our offer would be something like KAT + Mikal for Giannis + Portis. Maybe we toss in Deuce.
It all depends on what MIL is looking for and where Giannis really wants to go. I think MIL will send him to his preferred destination.
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
- RHODEY
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,747
- And1: 22,334
- Joined: May 18, 2007
- Location: Straight out of a comic book
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,563
- And1: 7,885
- Joined: Apr 10, 2017
-
Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd
I just want to say this again I really like Yabasule for the Knicks as a PF. His advance stats are good, the Knicks can give him guaranteed money or maybe even S&T Precious and some second rounders for him because I don’t think Philly can keep him at all if they plan to pay Grimes. They can go up maybe 1 year but offering him a multi year deal would kill their books.
He works next to KAT and Mitch who should be sharing minutes at the 5 next year.
He works next to KAT and Mitch who should be sharing minutes at the 5 next year.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
Luke 15:3-7