ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross

Moderators: GONYK, j4remi, NoLayupRule, Deeeez Knicks, Jeff Van Gully, mpharris36, dakomish23, HerSports85

User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 38,324
And1: 34,765
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#121 » by WaltFrazier » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:11 pm

DaGawd wrote:
Guano wrote:Losing sucks... losing to that team really sucks.

If shamet or Brunson hit their shots in crunch time we win yet its still nasty that theyre down key players and we lost.

Forces me to temper my expectations which I dont like. I want to be delusionally fantasize about us winning a chip this year.

Tuesday’s defeat wasn’t just another blemish on the Knicks’ record, but, according to Hall of Fame coach Phil Jackson, it was also the night New York officially renounced itself as a team that can truly contend for an NBA title. Jackson’s “40-20” theory states that if a team wins 40 games before it suffers 20 losses, it’s a championship contender. The Knicks dropped to 34-20 after falling to Indiana.

Jackson’s logic has a few flaws, including that it doesn’t account for injuries, but it has generally rung true. Since the NBA adopted the 3-point line for the 1979-80 season, while not counting shortened seasons (whether because of work stoppage or the pandemic), only four teams have won the NBA championship without winning 40 games before losing 20: the 1994-95 Houston Rockets, the 2003-04 Pistons, the 2005-06 Miami Heat and the 2020-21 Milwaukee Bucks. Going back further, since the NBA expanded to an 82-game regular-season schedule for the 1967-68 season, only five more teams (1967-68 Boston Celtics; 1974-75 Golden State Warriors; 1976-77 Portland Trail Blazers; 1977-78 Washington Bullets; and 1978-79 Seattle SuperSonics) have made Jackson look silly.


welp wrap this season up. it’s over


By today's standings, only OKC and Detroit are contenders. Pistons need 1 win before they lose 7. Spurs need 3 wins before they lose 4. Rockets need 7 wins before 1 loss, Celtics need 6 before they lose 1. Everyone else has 20 losses or more
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 38,324
And1: 34,765
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#122 » by WaltFrazier » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:12 pm

Sixers tonight, no game thread yet
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 25,598
And1: 20,813
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#123 » by Fury » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:19 pm

WaltFrazier wrote:Sixers tonight, no game thread yet


We're protesting the Knicks after last night's performance
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 25,598
And1: 20,813
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#124 » by Fury » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:20 pm

How are we in Philadelphia again, wtf. Who the hell made this schedule? It feels like we're always in Philadelphia and Detroit.
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 118,782
And1: 127,262
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#125 » by mpharris36 » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:20 pm

Fury wrote:
WaltFrazier wrote:Sixers tonight, no game thread yet


We're protesting the Knicks after last night's performance



sham should make it we need a low energy thread!
5-peat! 22-26 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Neemias Queta
Chet Holmgren/Isaiah Stewart/Mamu
Jaden McDaniels/Josh Hart
Desmond Bane/Jordan Miller
Tre Jones/Javon Small
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 9,341
And1: 7,007
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#126 » by 8516knicks » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:22 pm

Fury wrote:How are we in Philadelphia again, wtf. Who the hell made this schedule? It feels like we're always in Philadelphia and Detroit.


Tobias Harris? :D :lol:
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 9,341
And1: 7,007
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#127 » by 8516knicks » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:30 pm

Tuesday’s defeat wasn’t just another blemish on the Knicks’ record, but, according to Hall of Fame coach Phil Jackson, it was also the night New York officially renounced itself as a team that can truly contend for an NBA title. Jackson’s “40-20” theory states that if a team wins 40 games before it suffers 20 losses, it’s a championship contender. The Knicks dropped to 34-20 after falling to Indiana.

"Jackson’s logic has a few flaws, including that it doesn’t account for injuries, but it has generally rung true. Since the NBA adopted the 3-point line for the 1979-80 season, while not counting shortened seasons (whether because of work stoppage or the pandemic), only four teams have won the NBA championship without winning 40 games before losing 20: the 1994-95 Houston Rockets, the 2003-04 Pistons, the 2005-06 Miami Heat and the 2020-21 Milwaukee Bucks. Going back further, since the NBA expanded to an 82-game regular-season schedule for the 1967-68 season, only five more teams (1967-68 Boston Celtics; 1974-75 Golden State Warriors; 1976-77 Portland Trail Blazers; 1977-78 Washington Bullets; and 1978-79 Seattle SuperSonics) have made Jackson look silly."

My first thought on reading the list was "those poor Washington Bullet fans" haven't won in a LOOOOOOOOONG time. Then I realized they were more recent than the KNICKS! :nonono: :noway: :crazy: :banghead:
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 143,434
And1: 146,540
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#128 » by god shammgod » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:45 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
Fury wrote:
WaltFrazier wrote:Sixers tonight, no game thread yet


We're protesting the Knicks after last night's performance



sham should make it we need a low energy thread!


done
User avatar
Red Vines
RealGM
Posts: 36,676
And1: 12,057
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: MKE
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#129 » by Red Vines » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:48 pm

Won't be surprised to see Kolek back in the rotation, nobody else gets the ball moving like him. Alvarado can help too but it's natural to Kolek.
User avatar
FrozenEnvelope
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,096
And1: 5,672
Joined: Feb 03, 2020

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#130 » by FrozenEnvelope » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:51 pm

I gotta be honest I have no confidence this team is making the ECF. We still got 30 something games left but I haven't liked the DNA of this years team. We are 'Duncan Robinson' aka soft and timid. You don't see that hunger and toughness. Just look at the postgame interviews. These players don't even look like they care. Heck, we the fans show more of a pulse! They can't wait to swap jerseys and gossip with the opposing players after losses all smiling and ****!

HC Brown has done some good things and a 34-20 record is alright but considering the expectations coming into the season, I cannot say with a straight face that expectations have been reached. We are that student that barely passed the midterm.

Also losing faith in JB. I think we try to fool ourselves into hoping he is that elite level player and leader but I think maybe he's just a Robin and we still do not have a Batman.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 143,434
And1: 146,540
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#131 » by god shammgod » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:52 pm

mpharris36 wrote:over the course of 82 you will have games where effort is not always there especially defensively. Its also a lot of pressure when 3 of your best defenders are all out injured.

We still should have won the game but our typically very reliable captain had a rough 4th and OT...it happens. Move on...at the end of the day I take more from games against BOS ect or other quality teams than these games in Feb.

Still shouldn't have come down to late in 4th and OT if we were more connected defensively. We gave them too many open looks early and then they started making some tougher shots late. I'm not as worried about pacers record they have 3/5 of there starting Finals team still playing who took OKC to 7 games. They have good players when they are all playing. But we let them get into whatever they wanted early.

If anything might not be the worse thing...if the Pacers get a top 3-4 pick and bring back Hali and Zubac that will be a really tough team to beat...anything to keep them from getting a top pick!



i might buy into this if you didn't go through a horrible losing streak not too long ago where this was an issue that you supposedly corrected. did they forget already ?
User avatar
FrozenEnvelope
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,096
And1: 5,672
Joined: Feb 03, 2020

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#132 » by FrozenEnvelope » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:52 pm

WaltFrazier wrote:Sixers tonight, no game thread yet


Cause back to back on the road after a OT game at home the night before with this years team will surely go well.
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 118,782
And1: 127,262
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#133 » by mpharris36 » Wed Feb 11, 2026 3:56 pm

god shammgod wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:over the course of 82 you will have games where effort is not always there especially defensively. Its also a lot of pressure when 3 of your best defenders are all out injured.

We still should have won the game but our typically very reliable captain had a rough 4th and OT...it happens. Move on...at the end of the day I take more from games against BOS ect or other quality teams than these games in Feb.

Still shouldn't have come down to late in 4th and OT if we were more connected defensively. We gave them too many open looks early and then they started making some tougher shots late. I'm not as worried about pacers record they have 3/5 of there starting Finals team still playing who took OKC to 7 games. They have good players when they are all playing. But we let them get into whatever they wanted early.

If anything might not be the worse thing...if the Pacers get a top 3-4 pick and bring back Hali and Zubac that will be a really tough team to beat...anything to keep them from getting a top pick!



i might buy into this if you didn't go through a horrible losing streak not too long ago where this was an issue that you supposedly corrected. did they forget already ?


Fair and we need to be better. You can make the case though that OG, Mitch, and even Deuce are clearly 3 of what 4 best defenders along with Mikal?

Its not ideal. Especially when Alvarado and Mo two guys that had really good defensive games in BOS got absolutely cooked tonight by Indy.
5-peat! 22-26 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Neemias Queta
Chet Holmgren/Isaiah Stewart/Mamu
Jaden McDaniels/Josh Hart
Desmond Bane/Jordan Miller
Tre Jones/Javon Small
User avatar
G_K_F
General Manager
Posts: 9,105
And1: 11,898
Joined: Dec 08, 2018
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#134 » by G_K_F » Wed Feb 11, 2026 4:19 pm

The Pacers are better than us in every aspect. After 3 years I can safely say that.

This offseason we need to make a major move to alter the DNA of this team.

If we crash out before the ECF - which there is a great chance we will - the coach has to be fired and a major trade or two needs to take place. End of story. We aren’t one role player away from immortality. We need much more than that but, more importantly, we need a change in mentality.

Bridges and Towns are the 2 most mentally soft players on the squad. Something has to change here.
The OG Greek Freak
User avatar
Reign23
RealGM
Posts: 12,451
And1: 13,733
Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Location: Germany.
   

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#135 » by Reign23 » Wed Feb 11, 2026 4:35 pm

chill. we just won 9 out of 10.
formerly known as knickst4pe
User avatar
sol537
RealGM
Posts: 16,467
And1: 9,303
Joined: Nov 07, 2001

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#136 » by sol537 » Wed Feb 11, 2026 4:35 pm

G_K_F wrote:The Pacers are better than us in every aspect. After 3 years I can safely say that.

This offseason we need to make a major move to alter the DNA of this team.

If we crash out before the ECF - which there is a great chance we will - the coach has to be fired and a major trade or two needs to take place. End of story. We aren’t one role player away from immortality. We need much more than that but, more importantly, we need a change in mentality.

Bridges and Towns are the 2 most mentally soft players on the squad. Something has to change here.


Nah... it's way closer than that. I think if we can get Giannis with KAT/Mikal this summer, then you do it. Otherwise, I would be OK with keeping Bridges and shopping KAT for better fitting pieces. I don't think we need to blow everything up as we have lots of very solid foundational pieces already.

Next season, the East will have DET, CLE, BOS, and IND as powerhouses. It's possible one of PHI or CHA or ORL could also take a step up with the right moves. So that's 4-6 really strong teams that the Knicks will have to contend with. No cake walk...
shmeakone
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,834
And1: 1,944
Joined: Mar 26, 2012
Contact:
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#137 » by shmeakone » Wed Feb 11, 2026 4:44 pm

My first loss at MSG in 5 games was a tough one to swallow, that's for sure..
My lifetime better have a Knicks championship.
NY2k1
Veteran
Posts: 2,892
And1: 1,310
Joined: Dec 21, 2011

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#138 » by NY2k1 » Wed Feb 11, 2026 4:45 pm

G_K_F wrote:The Pacers are better than us in every aspect. After 3 years I can safely say that.

This offseason we need to make a major move to alter the DNA of this team.

If we crash out before the ECF - which there is a great chance we will - the coach has to be fired and a major trade or two needs to take place. End of story. We aren’t one role player away from immortality. We need much more than that but, more importantly, we need a change in mentality.

Bridges and Towns are the 2 most mentally soft players on the squad. Something has to change here.


Lol, nice overreaction to one game. You do realize the Knicks beat the Pacers earlier this season, right?

It took the Pacers everything and the kitchen sink to beat the Knicks last night. That was essentially their game 7 of the finals game. They'll go back to losing 10 in a row again.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 25,598
And1: 20,813
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#139 » by Fury » Wed Feb 11, 2026 4:47 pm

G_K_F wrote:The Pacers are better than us in every aspect. After 3 years I can safely say that.

This offseason we need to make a major move to alter the DNA of this team.

If we crash out before the ECF - which there is a great chance we will - the coach has to be fired and a major trade or two needs to take place. End of story. We aren’t one role player away from immortality. We need much more than that but, more importantly, we need a change in mentality.

Bridges and Towns are the 2 most mentally soft players on the squad. Something has to change here.


Image
User avatar
G_K_F
General Manager
Posts: 9,105
And1: 11,898
Joined: Dec 08, 2018
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross 

Post#140 » by G_K_F » Wed Feb 11, 2026 4:54 pm

NY2k1 wrote:
G_K_F wrote:The Pacers are better than us in every aspect. After 3 years I can safely say that.

This offseason we need to make a major move to alter the DNA of this team.

If we crash out before the ECF - which there is a great chance we will - the coach has to be fired and a major trade or two needs to take place. End of story. We aren’t one role player away from immortality. We need much more than that but, more importantly, we need a change in mentality.

Bridges and Towns are the 2 most mentally soft players on the squad. Something has to change here.


Lol, nice overreaction to one game. You do realize the Knicks beat the Pacers earlier this season, right?

It took the Pacers everything and the kitchen sink to beat the Knicks last night. That was essentially their game 7 of the finals game. They'll go back to losing 10 in a row again.


You realize the Pacers will have Haliburton and Zubac next year on a squad that already has owned us repeatedly?
The OG Greek Freak

Return to New York Knicks