BAT 8.0 TRADE DISCUSSION (DRAFT IN OTHER THREAD) PART II

LJ4pointplay · Post #1201 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:30 pm

kneega.. so I think me and willy worked out the earlier problem as follows..

willy gets 384 (my current last pick) and I get 391 (new last pick of draft).

Is that cool? if so, willy should update his sig..

WillyJakkz · Post #1202 » by **WillyJakkz** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:34 pm

moocow007 wrote:Wait...so is Okur 307 or is Lavoy Allen 307 again?

You'll have to start from the beginning of the "controversy" since you were here this morning when the Knicks20 picked a player who wasn't eligible but provided evidence that the guy should be, then blue posted the player knocks20 picked plus Okur were ineligible (which of course by this time I had already picked Okur), I saw your post (didn't wanna name names) of saying you didn't think or wasn't sure Okur was eligible either, so instead of debating (which I initially did) once I'd seen Knicks repick (probably to avoid any conflict) I edited my message and said No problem not worth the debate I'll repick as well, I select Lavoy Allen.

Fast forward to now and here we are.

I'm not arguing Lavoy Allen cause as stated obviously I know about the guy but wanted a scoring veteran presence, I am trying to stand up for the fairness of the other GM's which may have taken Lavoy Allen had they'd known he'd be re-entering the draft and seeing as the Commissioner is the GM who wanted decided he'd like Allen back in the draft AND he ends up drafting him isn't fair imho, not necessarily to me but to you guys cause clearly I wanted Okur BUT was obviously willing to select Allen.

TDJacksonville · Post #1203 » by **TDJacksonville** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:37 pm

Melothegreat wrote:
Smoke24 wrote:Ok team complete, no coach though. How do you guys like my team, tried to go in a different direction this BAT.

Mills is not a starter, Kendall Marshall would be a way better fit. He has better court vision and he much more of a pure PG.

Marshall Blows wads. No speed, No Shot, No Defense. only Positives are his Size and Passing but that wouldnt make me start him.

NewEra · Post #1204 » by **NewEra** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:42 pm

Got about 16 Eddy Currys still on the board

Context · Post #1205 » by **Context** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:45 pm

LJ4pointplay wrote:kneega.. so I think me and willy worked out the earlier problem as follows..

willy gets 384 (my current last pick) and I get 391 (new last pick of draft).

Is that cool? if so, willy should update his sig..

That's fine....

Post #1206 » by **moocow007** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:46 pm

NewEra wrote:Got about 16 Eddy Currys still on the board

Yeah there is still a good number of decent players left.

TDJacksonville · Post #1207 » by **TDJacksonville** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:51 pm

kneega wrote:
LJ4pointplay wrote:kneega.. so I think me and willy worked out the earlier problem as follows..

willy gets 384 (my current last pick) and I get 391 (new last pick of draft).

Is that cool? if so, willy should update his sig..

That's fine....

would be easier to see wat team has 14 picks :wink:

CANiLIVE · Post #1208 » by **CANiLIVE** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:54 pm

TDJacksonville wrote:
Melothegreat wrote:
Smoke24 wrote:Ok team complete, no coach though. How do you guys like my team, tried to go in a different direction this BAT.

Mills is not a starter, Kendall Marshall would be a way better fit. He has better court vision and he much more of a pure PG.

Marshall Blows wads. No speed, No Shot, No Defense. only Positives are his Size and Passing but that wouldnt make me start him.

Strength Good Size For Position, Leadership, Elite Passer, Rebounds, Position Quick Hands (Defense)

How can you blow "wads" with all that as a rookie PG? You do understand nba rookies don't come in polished right? Masrshall was the best pure PG in this years draft, every pg can't have westbrook speed and drose dunks.

By no means does marshall blow "wads' do some
Research.

LJ4pointplay · Post #1209 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:56 pm

so why was Rip still on board? I know hes not what he once was but still put up 12ppg on 45% shooting.. I moved him right into my starting lineup as he'll get plenty of open looks running around with Dirk, Joe, and Al commanding defensive attention.

br7knicks · Post #1210 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 7:59 pm

LJ4pointplay wrote:so why was Rip still on board? I know hes not what he once was but still put up 12ppg on 45% shooting.. I moved him right into my starting lineup as he'll get plenty of open looks running around with Dirk, Joe, and Al commanding defensive attention.

believe so. guy i was targeting was him if i didn't give you 321

LJ4pointplay · Post #1211 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:01 pm

br7knicks wrote:
LJ4pointplay wrote:so why was Rip still on board? I know hes not what he once was but still put up 12ppg on 45% shooting.. I moved him right into my starting lineup as he'll get plenty of open looks running around with Dirk, Joe, and Al commanding defensive attention.

believe so. guy i was targeting was him if i didn't give you 321

I actually had a feeling that was the case.

Post #1212 » by **mpharris36** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:01 pm

nice probably get to pick tomorrow

br7knicks · Post #1213 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:01 pm

don't forget jared jeffries is back on the block for an upcoming pick (315-345) now that i have my PF back.

the man can, and has, guarded PG-C

br7knicks · Post #1214 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:02 pm

LJ4pointplay wrote:
br7knicks wrote:
LJ4pointplay wrote:so why was Rip still on board? I know hes not what he once was but still put up 12ppg on 45% shooting.. I moved him right into my starting lineup as he'll get plenty of open looks running around with Dirk, Joe, and Al commanding defensive attention.

believe so. guy i was targeting was him if i didn't give you 321

I actually had a feeling that was the case.

yeah, but now that i have smith back, i don't need jeffries for his defense. wanted rip for all around game and veteran leadership off the bench. move roy to SF. but smith is offense and toughness off the bench.

Jose7 · Post #1215 » by **Jose7** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:03 pm

Happy i got Sanders as late as I did.

Defense and athleticism. Has problems with his immaturity but again Doc rivers is the ultimate motivator/ players coach

br7knicks · Post #1216 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:06 pm

Jose7© wrote:Happy i got Sanders as late as I did.

Defense and athleticism. Has problems with his immaturity but again Doc rivers is the ultimate motivator/ players coach

341 available?

LJ4pointplay · Post #1217 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:08 pm

BR, like your team much more with Boozer. Generally not a fan of his, but he'll work nice with Durant.

ezmoney707 · Post #1218 » by **ezmoney707** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:09 pm

ezmoney707 wrote:Fielding offers for Bargs conryjr5@gmail.com

br7knicks · Post #1219 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:09 pm

LJ4pointplay wrote:BR, like your team much more with Boozer. Generally not a fan of his, but he'll work nice with Durant.

thanks man. i think so too. a lot better than anderson. i needed a low post offensive presence. helps open up durant and spot-up shooting star martin

not a fan of boozers either actually

LJ4pointplay · Post #1220 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:15 pm

looking for a defensive minded SF off the bench, a scoring big off the bench, or a coach. My most likely trade scenario is moving one of my pgs for a coach or in a package with Delfino/Hamilton/Kwame/Mahimni.

LJ4pntply@gmail.com if you see something