Chanel Bomber wrote:RJ is not helping any team win at the moment. The eye test suggests it, the statistical evidence proves it.
If only he could hit some buzzer beaters to help a team win
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully
Chanel Bomber wrote:RJ is not helping any team win at the moment. The eye test suggests it, the statistical evidence proves it.

Chanel Bomber wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:So we have to build an entire roster around RJ for him to succeed?
And what if the Knicks still suck?
Every player in the NBA can use floor spacers and stretch 5s. These aren't just undervalued commodities.
What has RJ done to warrant having a roster built around him more than Randle, Obi or Mitch? Because they suffer from RJ's lack of shooting too.
I think you still need a # 1 option, but if you get another alpha that plays team ball and, in particular, is copasetic with pushing the pace, then RJ could be a dynamic # 2. Standing around in boring half court ISO ball is a detriment to his natural inclinations, so it is not so much a matter of building around him, but with him. When playing with the right teammates, RJ is a guy who will make those around him better, not worse.
If RJ becomes consistent, there is still more upside than he is given credit for. His high water marks so far show that scoring 25 points in a game is not really that big a deal for him when he gets in a rhythm.
Well, he rarely gets in a rhythm.
So who's this magical "alpha that plays team ball" who helps RJ AND who benefits from RJ's style of play?
Jokic? Curry?
And are we sure they need his 33% from 3 and lack of ability to finish at the rim?
Why would they want him over another average 3&D wing who can play passable defense and not shoot well from 3?
RJ is not helping any team win at the moment. The eye test suggests it, the statistical evidence proves it.
We're just reaching with those "he just needs the right cast of players around him to make them better", and deep down you know it. Because you're scrambling to find something good in hypothetical scenarios that are tailored to his individual needs. That's how you know it's not happening in real life.

El Poochio wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:RJ is not helping any team win at the moment. The eye test suggests it, the statistical evidence proves it.
If only he could hit some buzzer beaters to help a team win

El Poochio wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:RJ is not helping any team win at the moment. The eye test suggests it, the statistical evidence proves it.
If only he could hit some buzzer beaters to help a team win
blueNorange wrote:you know the possibility of this team using this to unite, come together, and all raise their level of play isn't out of the question.
for all we know the entire team agrees with randle.
Im Coming Home wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
I think you still need a # 1 option, but if you get another alpha that plays team ball and, in particular, is copasetic with pushing the pace, then RJ could be a dynamic # 2. Standing around in boring half court ISO ball is a detriment to his natural inclinations, so it is not so much a matter of building around him, but with him. When playing with the right teammates, RJ is a guy who will make those around him better, not worse.
If RJ becomes consistent, there is still more upside than he is given credit for. His high water marks so far show that scoring 25 points in a game is not really that big a deal for him when he gets in a rhythm.
Well, he rarely gets in a rhythm.
So who's this magical "alpha that plays team ball" who helps RJ AND who benefits from RJ's style of play?
Jokic? Curry?
And are we sure they need his 33% from 3 and lack of ability to finish at the rim?
Why would they want him over another average 3&D wing who can play passable defense and not shoot well from 3?
RJ is not helping any team win at the moment. The eye test suggests it, the statistical evidence proves it.
We're just reaching with those "he just needs the right cast of players around him to make them better", and deep down you know it. Because you're scrambling to find something good in hypothetical scenarios that are tailored to his individual needs. That's how you know it's not happening in real life.
Imagine saying this right after he hits a game-winner quite LITERALLY the biggest way to help 'a team win'
Da_Mane_Man wrote:blueNorange wrote:you know the possibility of this team using this to unite, come together, and all raise their level of play isn't out of the question.
for all we know the entire team agrees with randle.
unusually positive take from you. i disagree

El Poochio wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:El Poochio wrote:
Posters whereeeee
Stunning photo of an athletic specimen soaring through the air getting off an impossible shot with no time to spare against the best efforts of their formidable adversarySpoiler:
BugginOut wrote:Where the hell is Kemba? We really broke him riding him 40+ minutes during Covid week huh?
Amd they didn't shut up then.El Poochio wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:
Shaq puts it perfectly.
“Heavy is the head that wears the crown.”
Even Ernie agreed.
But these athletes were built different. I understand we’re in an era where everyone is up in their feelings now. A comedian had to apologize the other day for posting a picture on Instagram with his friend, Dave Chappelle. That’s the era we’re living in. Apologizing for pictures with friends.
Yeah they were from the era shut up n dribble
HEZI wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:HEZI wrote:
He's not a shooter, he's a scorer but he has to play the role of a shooter because we have terrible floor spacing, bigs that clog the paint, a stagnant offense built around a black hole outdated PF type. Yet even under that circumstance, RJ has flashed potential and found ways to have very good games. Now if only we can actually put the right pieces around him to maximize him, that'd be great
So we have to build an entire roster around RJ for him to succeed?
And what if the Knicks still suck?
Every player in the NBA can use floor spacers and stretch 5s. These aren't just undervalued commodities.
What has RJ done to warrant having a roster built around him more than Randle, Obi or Mitch? Because they suffer from RJ's lack of shooting too.
Never even said build the roster around him, he doesn't even need that. RJ would thrive on a lot of other teams because for one they don't have to play Randle ball and for two they have a style that would fit him better than what we have.
Also, what do we mean by succeed? Put up numbers on a bad team as a primary option? If so, he can definitely do that, like many of your favorite players can. Give him the opportunity to play on a team with Zero expectation as the main guy and watch his numbers without taking into account how awful the team would be, there's a lot of those guys out there in the league.

Chanel Bomber wrote:Im Coming Home wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Well, he rarely gets in a rhythm.
So who's this magical "alpha that plays team ball" who helps RJ AND who benefits from RJ's style of play?
Jokic? Curry?
And are we sure they need his 33% from 3 and lack of ability to finish at the rim?
Why would they want him over another average 3&D wing who can play passable defense and not shoot well from 3?
RJ is not helping any team win at the moment. The eye test suggests it, the statistical evidence proves it.
We're just reaching with those "he just needs the right cast of players around him to make them better", and deep down you know it. Because you're scrambling to find something good in hypothetical scenarios that are tailored to his individual needs. That's how you know it's not happening in real life.
Imagine saying this right after he hits a game-winner quite LITERALLY the biggest way to help 'a team win'
RJ shot 4 for 15.
His TS% last night was 38.78%. His FG% was 26.7%.
His efficiency for the entire season is awful.
RJ's game-winner was beautiful. But games don't last for only one possession.
You're missing the bigger picture here.
That's a hypocrite. Narcissists have a personality disorder where everything is about them.F N 11 wrote:2010 wrote:Randle is exactly what I thought he was. A mental weakling who wants to bask in the glory when fans are chanting “MVP” yet wants to sulk when is other teammates get shine. Wants to give the thumbs down and tell the people paying his salary to STFU when we are honest about his performance and effort level.
Get this guy tf outta NY, man! He is no leader. He is a cancer.
He can hold that fake ass apology too. People wanted to crucify Baez and Lindor when they did this for the Mets. Management and ownership got on their ass.
Here on the Knicks, they type him up a phony apology as damage control. And fans over here acting like it’s all good.
Y’all really deserve this yayo-jawed bum!
Randle fans wouldn’t even want that narcissist to be their homie lol.
My thoughts about him were 100% right although I was going off of a hunch he is a not good person. Narcissist say 1 thing and actions show the opposite.
El Poochio wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:RJ is not helping any team win at the moment. The eye test suggests it, the statistical evidence proves it.
If only he could hit some buzzer beaters to help a team win
BugginOut wrote:Where the hell is Kemba? We really broke him riding him 40+ minutes during Covid week huh?
Ah ha.El Poochio wrote:If NY was as tough place as advertised Dolan wouldnt be able to keep his seat for 20+ years
Clyde_Style wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Im Coming Home wrote:Imagine saying this right after he hits a game-winner quite LITERALLY the biggest way to help 'a team win'
RJ shot 4 for 15.
His TS% last night was 38.78%. His FG% was 26.7%.
His efficiency for the entire season is awful.
RJ's game-winner was beautiful. But games don't last for only one possession.
You're missing the bigger picture here.
Didn't he have 3 or 4 clutch plays in the final minute or two?
Your reputation as RJ's biggest supporter is on the line