NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What is the contingency plan if OG actually does walk? Do we make an offer on Butler?
Why contingency plan for something that's not going to happen?
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What is the contingency plan if OG actually does walk? Do we make an offer on Butler?
mpharris36 wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What is the contingency plan if OG actually does walk? Do we make an offer on Butler?
man I have no clue...I don't think there is one...who else defensively impacts the game on that level that would be available. That also can shoot it at a high clip and plays off Brunson perfectly?
I don't even want to imagine it because it would be a terrible look for Leon and Co.
Guano wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:navyblue wrote:Not possible, people have not had a chance to wrap their head around the new rules of the cba.
When you aquire more than 100% of outgoing trade you are hardcapped.
Or if you acquire a player in s&t you get hard capped.
This trade would put them way over hard cap.
Decline bogs, and then have randle + fillers to make a legal trade.
we're gonna get paul george and you'll like it
![]()
KnixinSix wrote:Guano wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:we're gonna get paul george and you'll like it
![]()
PG13 Saying he wants to play the right kind of basketball might be a hint at how the Knicks play here.
-He is best buds with Randle.
-He is CAA
-He has been a bit more durable his last 2 years.
-He is a high intangibles player and good defender (used to be elite) which is the type of player Knicks usually go after
He would allow our frontcourt rotation to have better minutes distribution reducing likelihood of overuse and injury like we saw this year
He could focus more on defense with all our other scoring options.
Not my ideal option BUT if we somehow keep Randle I'd be totally on board.
KnixinSix wrote:Guano wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:we're gonna get paul george and you'll like it
![]()
PG13 Saying he wants to play the right kind of basketball might be a hint at how the Knicks play here.
-He is best buds with Randle.
-He is CAA
-He has been a bit more durable his last 2 years.
-He is a high intangibles player and good defender (used to be elite) which is the type of player Knicks usually go after
He would allow our frontcourt rotation to have better minutes distribution reducing likelihood of overuse and injury like we saw this year
He could focus more on defense with all our other scoring options.
Not my ideal option BUT if we somehow keep Randle I'd be totally on board.

Fury wrote:mpharris36 wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What is the contingency plan if OG actually does walk? Do we make an offer on Butler?
man I have no clue...I don't think there is one...who else defensively impacts the game on that level that would be available. That also can shoot it at a high clip and plays off Brunson perfectly?
I don't even want to imagine it because it would be a terrible look for Leon and Co.
Plan B will be to discontinue the franchise
Fury wrote:KnixinSix wrote:Guano wrote:![]()
PG13 Saying he wants to play the right kind of basketball might be a hint at how the Knicks play here.
-He is best buds with Randle.
-He is CAA
-He has been a bit more durable his last 2 years.
-He is a high intangibles player and good defender (used to be elite) which is the type of player Knicks usually go after
He would allow our frontcourt rotation to have better minutes distribution reducing likelihood of overuse and injury like we saw this year
He could focus more on defense with all our other scoring options.
Not my ideal option BUT if we somehow keep Randle I'd be totally on board.
I'd like George and I would not like to trade Randle for him, but the only way to get him at 48 mill per year is to trade Randle.
Wildcat wrote:Fury wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
PG13 Saying he wants to play the right kind of basketball might be a hint at how the Knicks play here.
-He is best buds with Randle.
-He is CAA
-He has been a bit more durable his last 2 years.
-He is a high intangibles player and good defender (used to be elite) which is the type of player Knicks usually go after
He would allow our frontcourt rotation to have better minutes distribution reducing likelihood of overuse and injury like we saw this year
He could focus more on defense with all our other scoring options.
Not my ideal option BUT if we somehow keep Randle I'd be totally on board.
I'd like George and I would not like to trade Randle for him, but the only way to get him at 48 mill per year is to trade Randle.
That's assuming you're trading before draft. If/when he declines his player option, I think that ridiculous twitter trade proposal is feasible. Not sure why Clippers would do it, though.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What is the contingency plan if OG actually does walk? Do we make an offer on Butler?
Fury wrote:Wildcat wrote:Fury wrote:
I'd like George and I would not like to trade Randle for him, but the only way to get him at 48 mill per year is to trade Randle.
That's assuming you're trading before draft. If/when he declines his player option, I think that ridiculous twitter trade proposal is feasible. Not sure why Clippers would do it, though.
Does that scenario making the trade a sign and trade change anything (with the new CBA)?
Fury wrote:Wildcat wrote:Fury wrote:
I'd like George and I would not like to trade Randle for him, but the only way to get him at 48 mill per year is to trade Randle.
That's assuming you're trading before draft. If/when he declines his player option, I think that ridiculous twitter trade proposal is feasible. Not sure why Clippers would do it, though.
Does that scenario making the trade a sign and trade change anything (with the new CBA)?

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What is the contingency plan if OG actually does walk? Do we make an offer on Butler?
Ma10 wrote:https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10125486-2024-nba-mock-draft-with-5-trades-in-round-1
Not the worst trade idea?
Wildcat wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What is the contingency plan if OG actually does walk? Do we make an offer on Butler?
Why contingency plan for something that's not going to happen?
?