Zenzibar wrote:
According to some folks here, Wingo is younger than Obi Toppin
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
snadler wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:snadler wrote:
I'm pretty confident you are wrong on this, the hawks traded him because they weren't going to sign him long term..they also have higher priced vets making a lot of money that are getting playing time over him to begin with..nothing to do with red flags, but again, as I stated before, the knicks got him for free. if they traded Grimes for him, that would have been a different story
A protected first round pick is not "for free".
Grimes was a late first round draft pick. You're trading away something that's the equivalent of Grimes for an inefficient young player who's soon going to be eligible for an extension, and who wants a bigger role. That's the formula.
If Reddish becomes a positive contributor within the next 18 months, that changes everything. I don't think there's any reason to be confident that he will, but you never know.
First, the knicks traded down for Grimes, second as i stated before the knicks were not keeping this pick anyway..there is no room, it's for free..

god shammgod wrote:the pick is also top 18 protected for 2022. whose to say it even conveys this year ?
Chanel Bomber wrote:snadler wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:The Charlotte pick could've been a throw-in that helps a trade for a young player who's actually good, like Haliburton.
Now, I don't know to what extent Haliburton's actually available, and maybe Cam will break his own pattern of efficiency and ball out with the Knicks.
But I'm not a fan of trading assets for mediocre players.
I'd rather have packaged the Charlotte pick, Obi plus the Dallas pick for Hali (not sure the Kings take it but it's just a general idea). Then you get a young player who actually helps your team and who can also be traded at a later stage for a star if need be.
I don't know.
first of all a heavily protected late 1st in a week draft while the knicks already loaded with young players would likely have to trade that pick at some point just for roster flexibility isn't really much of an asset
Do you consider Grimes and IQ to be assets?
Because that Charlotte pick is pretty much on par with them as an asset. IQ's value is probably a bit higher, but still.

Deeeez Knicks wrote:god shammgod wrote:the pick is also top 18 protected for 2022. whose to say it even conveys this year ?
It may never convey and end up being 2 2nds. It was heavily protected which is why it didn't have a lot of value
Clyde_Style wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:snadler wrote:
first of all a heavily protected late 1st in a week draft while the knicks already loaded with young players would likely have to trade that pick at some point just for roster flexibility isn't really much of an asset
Do you consider Grimes and IQ to be assets?
Because that Charlotte pick is pretty much on par with them as an asset. IQ's value is probably a bit higher, but still.
They’re worth more since they’ve already proven they are NBA players. All picks have the risk of drafting a player who doesn’t stick
snadler wrote:Zion has shown nothing but being overweight and injury prone, hence he makes perfect sense for him to be the first superstar to actually wind up in NY, he won't play more than 20 games as a full maxed 350 pound PF...it's destined to happen
god shammgod wrote:i don't know what this will become but you guys will always defending everything at first to the death. those homer instincts kick in so strong. trading grimes, who has barely played much, would have been absolutely horrible but a pick that, at worst, would be around where grimes that was taken is worthless. it's nonsensical.
Clyde_Style wrote:Zenzibar wrote:
According to some folks here, Wingo is younger than Obi Toppin
DaGawd wrote:god shammgod wrote:i don't know what this will become but you guys will always defending everything at first to the death. those homer instincts kick in so strong. trading grimes, who has barely played much, would have been absolutely horrible but a pick that, at worst, would be around where grimes that was taken is worthless. it's nonsensical.
For me I’m just happy taking a worthwhile shot with that pick with a talented young player with tools. Cause realistically a star trade was never coming. There’s no one out there at the moment available worth trading a bunch of first rounders for.. other than maybe Zion who can maybe be had for a bit of a discount considering his weight/health situation atm
god shammgod wrote:i don't know what this will become but you guys will always defend everything at first to the death. those homer instincts kick in so strong. trading grimes, who has barely played much, would have been absolutely horrible but a pick that, at worst, would be around where grimes was taken is worthless. it's nonsensical.
TrueWarrior wrote:Cam went into the Knicks board grinder as Paul George and came out as Qyntel Woods in less than a day. Hahahaaaaa.
We all know we can’t have nice things. Let’s just hope my man Chanel’s fair and balanced analysis leads to what’s happening with RJ now lol.
ADeP7 wrote:god shammgod wrote:i don't know what this will become but you guys will always defend everything at first to the death. those homer instincts kick in so strong. trading grimes, who has barely played much, would have been absolutely horrible but a pick that, at worst, would be around where grimes was taken is worthless. it's nonsensical.
It goes both ways though. A lot of this board turned there nose at porzingis being traded for AD. Then turned there nose at trading Mitch for ad lol.
Laughed at adding a Fred vanvleet.
Talked knox up as pg or kd lite
Frank being a mini Giannis.
I mean even now I like grimes and iqs potential but some expectations of them is absurd. Same way if rj comes out and has a bad game tomorrow we are gonna get the same he’s a bust talks.
It’s a gamble. But if you trust the front office because they selected grimes and iq and they think getting a cam reddish with a late 1st pick is a better move than actually using the pick then why not trust them

god shammgod wrote:i don't know what this will become but you guys will always defend everything at first to the death. those homer instincts kick in so strong. trading grimes, who has barely played much, would have been absolutely horrible but a pick that, at worst, would be around where grimes was taken is worthless. it's nonsensical.