Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
KnickLeDime wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:
Agree 100%. I will be really disappointed if hes the pick
he is the most likely pick. and if it happens, you will love it!
*unacceptable joke* -JVG
Jay10 wrote:Brendan Brown on the Mike Francesa show, just said Memphis already has a trade lined up for their #4 pick.
Knicksfan20 wrote:Wtf I thought the draft was today.
FrontOfficeEye wrote:Frankie and I interviewed Chris Dowe, Elie Okobo's teammate yesterday. We talk about the difference between the pro game and international game, how Elie will translate (strengths and weaknesses as well), and also his thoughts on Luka.
(Ignore the hair...this was pre-haircut.)
newyorker4ever wrote:Orange Mamba wrote:The question is do you guys trust Givony or BOTP more?
I trust that both are just being used.
BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:Orange Mamba wrote:The question is do you guys trust Givony or BOTP more?
I trust that both are just being used.
Fixed
Jeff Van Gully wrote:god shammgod wrote:mikal is one of the least likely to bust. the question is his upside because we tend to think only young players can improve. in the 80s/90s everybody had 3 or 4 years in college and plenty of them got a lot better.
now now...
michael jordan would have been in the g-league today.
KnicksGod wrote:god shammgod wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
there was no parsons level contract involved in that deal. Parsons might be a worse deal then Noah. Think about that for a second. Now assess what it would take for the knicks to deal Noah?
i agree. also, i don't think frank has the kind of value where he would be the difference maker in getting the deal done. if they can shed parsons and get the 7th or 8th pick, they're not gonna choose the 9th because we include frank.
I'm back and ready for the Draft. So I'll start with critiquing your anti-Frank stance. He really showed a lot of improvement toward the end of the year on offense, including some pretty footwork, and we know he can defend and see the floor and will likely remain very long.
Capn'O wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:god shammgod wrote:mikal is one of the least likely to bust. the question is his upside because we tend to think only young players can improve. in the 80s/90s everybody had 3 or 4 years in college and plenty of them got a lot better.
now now...
michael jordan would have been in the g-league today.
OOOOOOOHHH that really grinds my gears!
JojoSlimbiid wrote:Some what shocked by your guys poll. Is this based on insider information or do you guys just really like Mikal?
Clyde_Style wrote:Capn'O wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:
now now...
michael jordan would have been in the g-league today.
OOOOOOOHHH that really grinds my gears!
Jeff would have played Jordan 10 MPG in his rookie year
god shammgod wrote:KnicksGod wrote:god shammgod wrote:
i agree. also, i don't think frank has the kind of value where he would be the difference maker in getting the deal done. if they can shed parsons and get the 7th or 8th pick, they're not gonna choose the 9th because we include frank.
I'm back and ready for the Draft. So I'll start with critiquing your anti-Frank stance. He really showed a lot of improvement toward the end of the year on offense, including some pretty footwork, and we know he can defend and see the floor and will likely remain very long.
it's not an anti-frank stance actually, i think they would just rather have the better pick and dump parsons for an expiring. lee & frank aren't really what they're after.
and welcome back
JojoSlimbiid wrote:Some what shocked by your guys poll. Is this based on insider information or do you guys just really like Mikal?
Jeff Van Gully wrote:JojoSlimbiid wrote:Some what shocked by your guys poll. Is this based on insider information or do you guys just really like Mikal?
if we pass on him, you guys are going to really like mikal.
Clyde_Style wrote:god shammgod wrote:KnicksGod wrote:
I'm back and ready for the Draft. So I'll start with critiquing your anti-Frank stance. He really showed a lot of improvement toward the end of the year on offense, including some pretty footwork, and we know he can defend and see the floor and will likely remain very long.
it's not an anti-frank stance actually, i think they would just rather have the better pick and dump parsons for an expiring. lee & frank aren't really what they're after.
and welcome back
not sure what that means TBH
