Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
dakomish23 wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
It would be frightening if Hakeem trains him when he's able to do on court activities again
IDK why more ppl don't go to him. Didn't Kobe do a week with him and just come out a demon the next season? No one was stopping him in the post.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:He’s really playing very well offensively this year. But he earns twice as much and does not defend.
It’s too bad Mikalikina doesn’t defend either.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:He’s really playing very well offensively this year. But he earns twice as much and does not defend.
It’s too bad Mikalikina doesn’t defend either.
DOT wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:It’s too bad Mikalikina doesn’t defend either.
Mikal was 2nd in DPOY voting 3 years ago
The thing about pretending to be dumb is, the best case scenario is everyone thinks you're dumb.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:He’s really playing very well offensively this year. But he earns twice as much and does not defend.
It’s too bad Mikalikina doesn’t defend either.
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:It’s too bad Mikalikina doesn’t defend either.
You don’t realize it but you just propped up mikal’s +\- on Phoenix which is due to my guy Ayton carrying him. Thanks for strengthening my side even more
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
You don’t realize it but you just propped up mikal’s +\- on Phoenix which is due to my guy Ayton carrying him. Thanks for strengthening my side even more
3toheadmelo wrote:
i honestly feel better about trading for lavine than paul george. paul george has played 56 games this season, 31 games last season. 54 in 2020-21, 48 in 2019-2020. hes always hurt and requires load management.
lavine played 77 this year and 67 last year. 58 in 2020-2021, 60 in 2019-2020
NoDopeOnSunday wrote: I'd take PG over LaVine for 3 reasons; presumably a lower price to get him, less years on contract so if things go bad you're out of the woods sooner and he's still a two-way player. We'd have a lot more flexibility on defense with him, as much as I love Brunson he is not a good defender so keeping other perimeter defenders out there with him is important.
DOT wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:It’s too bad Mikalikina doesn’t defend either.
Mikal was 2nd in DPOY voting 3 years ago
The thing about pretending to be dumb is, the best case scenario is everyone thinks you're dumb.
you’re better off talking to yourself in the nfl thread. 3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
You don’t realize it but you just propped up mikal’s +\- on Phoenix which is due to my guy Ayton carrying him. Thanks for strengthening my side even more3toheadmelo wrote:
i honestly feel better about trading for lavine than paul george. paul george has played 56 games this season, 31 games last season. 54 in 2020-21, 48 in 2019-2020. hes always hurt and requires load management.
lavine played 77 this year and 67 last year. 58 in 2020-2021, 60 in 2019-2020NoDopeOnSunday wrote: I'd take PG over LaVine for 3 reasons; presumably a lower price to get him, less years on contract so if things go bad you're out of the woods sooner and he's still a two-way player. We'd have a lot more flexibility on defense with him, as much as I love Brunson he is not a good defender so keeping other perimeter defenders out there with him is important.
On the right side of history as usual
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
i honestly feel better about trading for lavine than paul george. paul george has played 56 games this season, 31 games last season. 54 in 2020-21, 48 in 2019-2020. hes always hurt and requires load management.
lavine played 77 this year and 67 last year. 58 in 2020-2021, 60 in 2019-2020NoDopeOnSunday wrote: I'd take PG over LaVine for 3 reasons; presumably a lower price to get him, less years on contract so if things go bad you're out of the woods sooner and he's still a two-way player. We'd have a lot more flexibility on defense with him, as much as I love Brunson he is not a good defender so keeping other perimeter defenders out there with him is important.
On the right side of history as usual
The difference is, you still want LaVine. I learn from mistakes, you continue to stick forks in electrical sockets and wonder why you're getting shocked.
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
On the right side of history as usual
The difference is, you still want LaVine. I learn from mistakes, you continue to stick forks in electrical sockets and wonder why you're getting shocked.
I was on the right side of history, lavine is balling. Another win for melozakistan while nodopetopia continues to drown
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
The difference is, you still want LaVine. I learn from mistakes, you continue to stick forks in electrical sockets and wonder why you're getting shocked.
I was on the right side of history, lavine is balling. Another win for melozakistan while nodopetopia continues to drown
Right side of history? You STILL want LaVine, that ain't history, that's present day. It's why you brought up Ayton unsolicited, I liked him back in the day, but he's buns today. Learn to let go Melo, LaVine is a loser no matter how hard you try to spin it, let it go.
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
I was on the right side of history, lavine is balling. Another win for melozakistan while nodopetopia continues to drown
Right side of history? You STILL want LaVine, that ain't history, that's present day. It's why you brought up Ayton unsolicited, I liked him back in the day, but he's buns today. Learn to let go Melo, LaVine is a loser no matter how hard you try to spin it, let it go.
Maybe one day you’ll be on the right side of history. Just maybe!
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Right side of history? You STILL want LaVine, that ain't history, that's present day. It's why you brought up Ayton unsolicited, I liked him back in the day, but he's buns today. Learn to let go Melo, LaVine is a loser no matter how hard you try to spin it, let it go.
Maybe one day you’ll be on the right side of history. Just maybe!
I was right about us not giving an extension to a mid PF in August, you remember that one, right?
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
Maybe one day you’ll be on the right side of history. Just maybe!
I was right about us not giving an extension to a mid PF in August, you remember that one, right?
Not sure, do you have a specific name in mind?
