ImageImageImageImageImage

[Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
kosmovitelli
RealGM
Posts: 11,006
And1: 429
Joined: Aug 09, 2001

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1361 » by kosmovitelli » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:32 pm

Johnny Hoops wrote:Koz -

Thought I read just the other day that the Knicks can't trade any #1 picks out until 2016 or something like that because the Houston 2012 #1 pick has provisions on it that could force it to be moved to latter years.

I thought it was Coon who mentioned this.

I think he basically said we can't trade any #1 picks unless we get a 2012 pick -- but I may have misunderstood.


Didn't see that. Do you have a link ?

On nbadraft.net it says top 5 protected but there's no indication on the protection of the pick after that. Larry Coon probably knows more about the condition and protection of the pick after 2012.
Usually the pick becomes unprotected after a number of years but there are also cases where it's a specific year and if the pick is protected then the team will give up a two second round picks instead. It really depends how the trade was negotiated and the terms of the trade.

If Coon said the Knicks can't trade first round pick until 2016 then it means the pick is still protected in 2013 and unprotected in 2014. In that case, 2016 is indeed the first year we could trade another first round pick.
kingmalaki
Pro Prospect
Posts: 822
And1: 120
Joined: Dec 28, 2006

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1362 » by kingmalaki » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:36 pm

smw6230 wrote:
kingmalaki wrote:
Invictus wrote:NJ Deal>>>>that "potential" deal. Nuggets balked.

What makes you think that Houston offers that type of deal knowing what Denver rejected, ESPECIALLY considering it's just for a rental?


NJ needed an extension to get a deal done, or at least seemed to care about one. Our GM doesn't seem to care about one. World of difference.

I've already stated I don't see us giving up enough to beat a full price Melo package from NY, but I'm sure our rental offer can beat lowball offers like the one that was supposedely rejected.


Riddle me this.

What exactly is Denver's incentive to make Houston, a direct playoff competitor and conference rival, better at a bargain basement price?


Denver's incentive should be to get the best deal possible. Do you see them accepting a worse package from NY than a better package from any Western team?

The conference argument is overblown. Teams have shown that they will trade within the conference, and the division, if that is the best deal on the table. It's really overblown in this case if Melo wants NY regardless at the end of the day....so why would Denver care who they rented him to for the remainder of this season?
siar617
Analyst
Posts: 3,079
And1: 457
Joined: May 11, 2009

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1363 » by siar617 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:39 pm

Does anyone think we can get Paul George from the Pacers along with a pick. I'm hoping we don't try to keep someone and lose out. One way or another we are going to lose someone. As long as we get other pieces to replace these ROLE PLAYERS , really that's all they are. If we could get Caspi and Thompson I'd let Gallo go.
kingmalaki
Pro Prospect
Posts: 822
And1: 120
Joined: Dec 28, 2006

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1364 » by kingmalaki » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:42 pm

NYK0605 wrote:Im still trying to figure out why any team would want to rent Melo with the exception of Dallas.

Why the hell does Houston want to rent him? Do they think they are one player away? Stupid.


As it stands now, NY has a better record than us, although there isn't much seperation. This matters for our pick swap for the 2011 draft. If Melo winds up in NY this year then the value of the potential 2011 swap and the 2012 pick suffer. If Melo winds up in Houston this year then I'm pretty sure the Rockets will finish better than the Knicks and use the pick swap. If Melo doesn't want to stay then the team is hedging that he will still want his money and that we can possibly get something else from NY this summer, as we will own his bird rights. Even a large TE can help a team rebuild (the Jazz got Jefferson with a TE).

So if you don't have to gut your team to rent him then it still makes sense, especially if the players you are giving up aren't getting to play anyway due to team depth.

Edit: And I'm sure the Rockets can make a playoff run, maybe 2nd round or WCF with a miracle, with Melo this season. That beats landing in the lotto.
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1365 » by K_ick_God » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:43 pm

I don't really buy that the Knicks have already offered Fields. And I don't think Denver will want Chandler given his RFA status.

Also, I was thinking about the Nets after a day or two to let it digest: I don't necessarily think they're bluffing purely, but I do think that they got negative signals from Melo and at this point their approach is simply, 'We're out, but if anybody has a change of heart, they know where to find us.' That's not really a bluff per se, just good business. And I do think it was born out of the fact that Melo indicated that he's not interested in the Nyets at this time.
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 32,045
And1: 21,060
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1366 » by stuporman » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:44 pm

Let the Rockets blow their wad to rent Melo..... :lol:

They would probably make the playoffs with him.... and possibly even have a better record than the Knicks would by season's end with Melo.... :lol:

Then watch him leave to come to the Knicks as a FA.... :lol: :lol:
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
NYK0605
Banned User
Posts: 1,893
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 31, 2010
Location: MSG

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1367 » by NYK0605 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:47 pm

Sorry if this is a repost.

alanhahn
Re: NY radio report that DEN rejected Wilson, Landry, Eddy + pick: if Nugs interested in that, this would have been done a long time ago
User avatar
Jitpal
General Manager
Posts: 8,149
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Long Island
Contact:

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1368 » by Jitpal » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:48 pm

kingmalaki wrote:
NYK0605 wrote:Im still trying to figure out why any team would want to rent Melo with the exception of Dallas.

Why the hell does Houston want to rent him? Do they think they are one player away? Stupid.


As it stands now, NY has a better record than us, although there isn't much seperation. This matters for our pick swap for the 2011 draft. If Melo winds up in NY this year then the value of the potential 2011 swap and the 2012 pick suffer. If Melo winds up in Houston this year then I'm pretty sure the Rockets will finish better than the Knicks and use the pick swap. If Melo doesn't want to stay then the team is hedging that he will still want his money and that we can possibly get something else from NY this summer, as we will own his bird rights. Even a large TE can help a team rebuild (the Jazz got Jefferson with a TE).

So if you don't have to gut your team to rent him then it still makes sense, especially if the players you are giving up aren't getting to play anyway due to team depth.

Edit: And I'm sure the Rockets can make a playoff run, maybe 2nd round or WCF with a miracle, with Melo this season. That beats landing in the lotto.

Does that though? If Melo walks, where do the Rockets go from there? Fewer assets and no high pick. Sure you would have cap space, but you have that with Yao leaving anyway. I just don't get it from the Rockets perspective. Assuming the Rockets get Melo without giving up a lot of what makes the Rockets good now, the Rockets still aren't getting past the Lakers, Spurs or Mavs. Doesn't make sense to me, but who knows. -Jitpal
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,252
And1: 25,712
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1369 » by moocow007 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:49 pm

siar617 wrote:Does anyone think we can get Paul George from the Pacers along with a pick. I'm hoping we don't try to keep someone and lose out. One way or another we are going to lose someone. As long as we get other pieces to replace these ROLE PLAYERS , really that's all they are. If we could get Caspi and Thompson I'd let Gallo go.


Not likely for George AND a 1st round pick.

While I do believe that the Pacers view Randolph much higher than the majority of the people here Randolph is still a risk. A 1st round pick might be worth the risk but a 1st AND a nice young talent like George (who btw can do real nice in this system...if D'Antoni would play him)? Not a chance.
User avatar
kosmovitelli
RealGM
Posts: 11,006
And1: 429
Joined: Aug 09, 2001

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1370 » by kosmovitelli » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:52 pm

For swisscheeseD and Johnny Hoops :

I did some research and found out the protection on the pick : it's top 5 protected until 2015 and if the pick is not conveyed by 2015 then the Knicks will send Houston two second round picks instead to fulfill their obligations. I'll let you read Coon's detailed answer about that. Sorry about my mistake, didn't know the pick was protected until 2015. As a result, right now, we can only trade our 2017 first round pick ! LOL


Chris in Ny:

If the Knicks acquire a first round pick in 2012 will they be able to trade their 2011 and 2013 first rounders?


Larry Coon :

Chris -- They can trade two picks, but there's a wrinkle that complicates matters.

Here's the full answer: The "Ted Stepien Rule" prevents teams from trading their future first round picks in consecutive years. So if a team (like the Knicks) has traded its 2012 first round pick, it can't trade its 2011 or 2013 picks. Note that the Stepien rule looks only at the future -- it doesn't matter that the team also traded its 2010 pick. That pick is in the past, and the Stepien rule ignores it.

Even if a team might not have a pick (because it's lottery-protected, for example) it's still subject to the Stepien rule. If a team might not be without a future first round pick, then they can't trade the pick in the year before or the year after.

The Knicks have traded the right to swap 2011 #1's to Houston, so New York will end up with the lesser of its pick and Houston's pick. But they will have a pick, so their 2011 pick is not considered to be traded as far as the Stepeien rule is concerned. A team doesn't need to have its own first round pick in a given year -- any first round pick will do.

So here's the Knicks' situation: They will have a 2011 first round pick (either their own or Houston's). They have traded away their 2012 pick (again to Houston), but it's top-5 protected all the way to 2015. If the 2012 pick is in the top-5 then Houston gets their 2013 pick instead. If the 2013 pick is top-5, then they get the 2014 pick. If the 2014 pick is in the top-5 then they get their 2015 pick. If the 2015 pick is top-5, then they stop trying to send a first round pick, and give them two second round picks instead.

So New York may be without its 2012, 2013, 2014 or 2015 first round pick -- and we don't know for sure which one it'll be. This means that right now New York can't trade its picks in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 or 2016 -- because if they do so they might be without a first round pick two consecutive years in the future -- and that's enough for the Stepien rule to put the kibosh on it.

But let's look at what happens if the Knicks acquire another team's 2012 pick:

* If their own 2012 pick ends up going to Houston, then they will still have a pick in 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, so their 2011 and 2013 picks can be traded.

* If their own 2013 pick ends up going to Houston, then they will have one pick in 2011, two picks in 2012, none in 2013, one in 2014, and one in 2015. They can trade their 2011 pick and one of the 2012 picks.

* If their own 2014 or 2015 pick ends up going to Houston, then they are in the same situation as 2013 -- they can still trade their 2011 pick and one of their 2012 picks.

So final answer -- If Donnie Walsh acquires a 2012 pick from another team, he can then trade two future first round picks (presumably to Denver). One will definitelty be their 2011 pick (the lesser of theirs and Houston's). The other will be either a 2012 pick or their 2013 pick, depending on whether their 2012 pick is in the top five.

Any trade agreement to move two picks would have to spell this out -- it would specify that they are trading whichever 2011 pick they end up with after Houston has their say; and it would specify that it will be their 2013 pick if their 2012 pick is conveyed to Houston, or one of the specific 2012 picks if their 2012 pick is not conveyed to Houston.

Isiahs Garden
Pro Prospect
Posts: 925
And1: 32
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: NJ

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1371 » by Isiahs Garden » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:52 pm

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=46g6km6

And I didn't even start drinking yet.
kingmalaki
Pro Prospect
Posts: 822
And1: 120
Joined: Dec 28, 2006

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1372 » by kingmalaki » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:53 pm

Jitpal wrote:
kingmalaki wrote:
NYK0605 wrote:Im still trying to figure out why any team would want to rent Melo with the exception of Dallas.

Why the hell does Houston want to rent him? Do they think they are one player away? Stupid.


As it stands now, NY has a better record than us, although there isn't much seperation. This matters for our pick swap for the 2011 draft. If Melo winds up in NY this year then the value of the potential 2011 swap and the 2012 pick suffer. If Melo winds up in Houston this year then I'm pretty sure the Rockets will finish better than the Knicks and use the pick swap. If Melo doesn't want to stay then the team is hedging that he will still want his money and that we can possibly get something else from NY this summer, as we will own his bird rights. Even a large TE can help a team rebuild (the Jazz got Jefferson with a TE).

So if you don't have to gut your team to rent him then it still makes sense, especially if the players you are giving up aren't getting to play anyway due to team depth.

Edit: And I'm sure the Rockets can make a playoff run, maybe 2nd round or WCF with a miracle, with Melo this season. That beats landing in the lotto.

Does that though? If Melo walks, where do the Rockets go from there? Fewer assets and no high pick. Sure you would have cap space, but you have that with Yao leaving anyway. I just don't get it from the Rockets perspective. Assuming the Rockets get Melo without giving up a lot of what makes the Rockets good now, the Rockets still aren't getting past the Lakers, Spurs or Mavs. Doesn't make sense to me, but who knows. -Jitpal


The answer lies in the bolded part. It all depends on what the cost is. No one knows what Morey is willing to give. As I stated earlier, this dude always comes out of left field so it doesn't make much sense to try to guess what he is giving (not trying to be smart, just saying he is always doing stuff no one would have guessed).

All I'm saying is all signs point to us being interested even without an extension, and we have the assets to beat lowball offers from NY. Full value offers....I'm not si sure about.
User avatar
towelie
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,829
And1: 43
Joined: Aug 02, 2004
Location: Brooklyn

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1373 » by towelie » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:58 pm

Koz, we can still trade a 2014 pick with a simple stipulation: "if ny does not convey 2012 pick to houston, then ny sends 2015 pick, etc"

It's how we still traded picks in curry trade despite owing a protected 1st for marbury.
User avatar
Jitpal
General Manager
Posts: 8,149
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Long Island
Contact:

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1374 » by Jitpal » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:59 pm

kingmalaki wrote:
Jitpal wrote:Does that though? If Melo walks, where do the Rockets go from there? Fewer assets and no high pick. Sure you would have cap space, but you have that with Yao leaving anyway. I just don't get it from the Rockets perspective. Assuming the Rockets get Melo without giving up a lot of what makes the Rockets good now, the Rockets still aren't getting past the Lakers, Spurs or Mavs. Doesn't make sense to me, but who knows. -Jitpal


The answer lies in the bolded part. It all depends on what the cost is. No one knows what Morey is willing to give. As I stated earlier, this dude always comes out of left field so it doesn't make much sense to try to guess what he is giving (not trying to be smart, just saying he is always doing stuff no one would have guessed).

All I'm saying is all signs point to us being interested even without an extension, and we have the assets to beat lowball offers from NY. Full value offers....I'm not si sure about.

I don't think you understand my point. Let's, for argument's sake, say that the Rockets are able to trade Yao's expiring deal and the Knicks 2012 1st for Melo. That's the deal. Nothing else. Are the Rockets with that squad getting past the Mavs, Spurs or Lakers? My opinion is no, I'm curious to hear yours.

Then, the following season, when Melo inevitably leaves where do the Rockets go? You have the same cap space as you would have before with just Yao leaving. Your own pick for the 2010-2011 season is worse, because you played better with Melo. Plus, you've given up the Knicks 2012 pick. Leaving you with fewer assets and the same cap space as you would have anyway. Where do the Rockets go? -Jitpal
nykfan70
Banned User
Posts: 4,200
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 29, 2006

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1375 » by nykfan70 » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:01 am

kosmovitelli wrote:For swisscheeseD and Johnny Hoops :

I did some research and found out the protection on the pick : it's top 5 protected until 2015 and if the pick is not conveyed by 2015 then the Knicks will send Houston two second round picks instead to fulfill their obligations. I'll let you read Coon's detailed answer about that. Sorry about my mistake, didn't know the pick was protected until 2015. As a result, right now, we can only trade our 2017 first round pick ! LOL


Chris in Ny:

If the Knicks acquire a first round pick in 2012 will they be able to trade their 2011 and 2013 first rounders?


Larry Coon :

Chris -- They can trade two picks, but there's a wrinkle that complicates matters.

Here's the full answer: The "Ted Stepien Rule" prevents teams from trading their future first round picks in consecutive years. So if a team (like the Knicks) has traded its 2012 first round pick, it can't trade its 2011 or 2013 picks. Note that the Stepien rule looks only at the future -- it doesn't matter that the team also traded its 2010 pick. That pick is in the past, and the Stepien rule ignores it.

Even if a team might not have a pick (because it's lottery-protected, for example) it's still subject to the Stepien rule. If a team might not be without a future first round pick, then they can't trade the pick in the year before or the year after.

The Knicks have traded the right to swap 2011 #1's to Houston, so New York will end up with the lesser of its pick and Houston's pick. But they will have a pick, so their 2011 pick is not considered to be traded as far as the Stepeien rule is concerned. A team doesn't need to have its own first round pick in a given year -- any first round pick will do.

So here's the Knicks' situation: They will have a 2011 first round pick (either their own or Houston's). They have traded away their 2012 pick (again to Houston), but it's top-5 protected all the way to 2015. If the 2012 pick is in the top-5 then Houston gets their 2013 pick instead. If the 2013 pick is top-5, then they get the 2014 pick. If the 2014 pick is in the top-5 then they get their 2015 pick. If the 2015 pick is top-5, then they stop trying to send a first round pick, and give them two second round picks instead.

So New York may be without its 2012, 2013, 2014 or 2015 first round pick -- and we don't know for sure which one it'll be. This means that right now New York can't trade its picks in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 or 2016 -- because if they do so they might be without a first round pick two consecutive years in the future -- and that's enough for the Stepien rule to put the kibosh on it.

But let's look at what happens if the Knicks acquire another team's 2012 pick:

* If their own 2012 pick ends up going to Houston, then they will still have a pick in 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, so their 2011 and 2013 picks can be traded.

* If their own 2013 pick ends up going to Houston, then they will have one pick in 2011, two picks in 2012, none in 2013, one in 2014, and one in 2015. They can trade their 2011 pick and one of the 2012 picks.

* If their own 2014 or 2015 pick ends up going to Houston, then they are in the same situation as 2013 -- they can still trade their 2011 pick and one of their 2012 picks.

So final answer -- If Donnie Walsh acquires a 2012 pick from another team, he can then trade two future first round picks (presumably to Denver). One will definitelty be their 2011 pick (the lesser of theirs and Houston's). The other will be either a 2012 pick or their 2013 pick, depending on whether their 2012 pick is in the top five.

Any trade agreement to move two picks would have to spell this out -- it would specify that they are trading whichever 2011 pick they end up with after Houston has their say; and it would specify that it will be their 2013 pick if their 2012 pick is conveyed to Houston, or one of the specific 2012 picks if their 2012 pick is not conveyed to Houston.



I posted this very same piece 2 days ago, when this Chat with Larry just to let you know, that's if anyone cares at all.
User avatar
Futureisnow
Head Coach
Posts: 7,025
And1: 1,282
Joined: Oct 28, 2009
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1376 » by Futureisnow » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:12 am

I think someone nailed it earlier when they said we're going to have to trade Gallo for picks to use in this trade. DEN has no interest in him.

And it's starting to look like just signing the guy outright this offseason is going to be more difficult than some think...especially since it's pretty much a guarantee that we'll lose Chandler.

Donnie's experienced. This first offer was a test jab. The type you toss out there just to see how your adversary reacts. Hopefully we got some sort of indication of what they're looking for and we can assess whether it's prudent and feasible.
Knickplaya
Banned User
Posts: 700
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2011
Location: Knick Nation (Philly, PA)

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1377 » by Knickplaya » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:19 am

Futureisnow wrote:I think someone nailed it earlier when they said we're going to have to trade Gallo for picks to use in this trade. DEN has no interest in him.




But another team might like Gallo more than picks. Look he has been compared to a young Dirk, and I don't really agree with that, but I know people are very high on him around the NBA. I am sure we can find someone who either likes Gallo more than a couple first-round picks that we can send to Denver, or we can find someone who likes Mayo in the deal, and make it work for Denver.
Punk
Banned User
Posts: 3,068
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 21, 2010
Location: Sippin on some sizzurp

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1378 » by Punk » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:19 am

Well...atleast we are making offers. I guess we'll end up losing all of our core talent.
Dr. Detfink
RealGM
Posts: 18,889
And1: 4,552
Joined: Dec 31, 2005

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1379 » by Dr. Detfink » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:20 am

Can the Knicks find a way to get Stephen Curry and then package him with AR for #1 pick, and some change for Melo?
duetta
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,437
And1: 12,886
Joined: Aug 28, 2002
Location: Patrolling the middle....

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 11] - Knicks make offer? Pg 82 

Post#1380 » by duetta » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:21 am

So, Donnie offered both Chandler and Fields - and that wasn't enough? Hang up the phone, walk away from the table.

Return to New York Knicks