ImageImageImageImageImage

MeloDrama Part V

Moderators: mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks

VirginiaKnickFan
RealGM
Posts: 12,618
And1: 3,547
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: Virginia

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1361 » by VirginiaKnickFan » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:45 am

Why do I think of this when I hear the term supermax.

Image
User avatar
Red Vines
RealGM
Posts: 34,849
And1: 10,192
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1362 » by Red Vines » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:45 am

supermax supermax supermax....
User avatar
nyk4life12
Pro Prospect
Posts: 818
And1: 208
Joined: May 07, 2010
Location: NY
       

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1363 » by nyk4life12 » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:46 am

HighRyzer83 wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:Sounds like he's coming back, so the Lakers are back to having no players or coaches or talent, nor a clear GM, and the Bulls are left with some confused lawyers, stray dogs and a knee surgery to be named later.

The Lakers would be a good team to S&T with though. Gasol, Randle, and 1st pick which will no doubt be a lottery. Possibly another future pick as well, if they want him that badly


lakers don't have to s&t they can sign melo outright
NY KNICKS
CHELSEA FC
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,947
And1: 45,637
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1364 » by GONYK » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:46 am

HighRyzer83 wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:Sounds like he's coming back, so the Lakers are back to having no players or coaches or talent, nor a clear GM, and the Bulls are left with some confused lawyers, stray dogs and a knee surgery to be named later.

The Lakers would be a good team to S&T with though. Gasol, Randle, and 1st pick which will no doubt be a lottery. Possibly another future pick as well, if they want him that badly

You clearly don't understand how this works
suicidedeuce
And1: 0

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1365 » by suicidedeuce » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:46 am

Red Vines wrote:
suicidedeuce wrote:
Red Vines wrote:
There's obviously a different max for different players depending on years in the league, etc. The top category people call the super-max. Like here: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/whe ... o-the-max/


Of course there is.

I just explained that to you.

0-6 years in the league it's 25% of the specially calculated cap figure.

7-9 it's 30%

10+ it's 35%.

OR 105% of your last salary.

But Melo's salary is NOT the highest you can qualify for in the NBA.

If Stoudemire had opted out of his contract, he would have qualified for a higher salary than Melo.

Kobe Bryant made $30m this past season.

So calling Melo's max the Kobe or supermax suggesting it's the highest salary you can get inthe NBA is not only superfluous, it's misleading.


I don't know about STAT but Kobe's huge contract was before the new CBA. I don't think it's misleading, it's the top category.


That's what "max" means.
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1366 » by Thugger HBC » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:47 am

Red Vines wrote:
suicidedeuce wrote:
Red Vines wrote:
There's obviously a different max for different players depending on years in the league, etc. The top category people call the super-max. Like here: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/whe ... o-the-max/


Of course there is.

I just explained that to you.

0-6 years in the league it's 25% of the specially calculated cap figure.

7-9 it's 30%

10+ it's 35%.

OR 105% of your last salary.

But Melo's salary is NOT the highest you can qualify for in the NBA.

If Stoudemire had opted out of his contract, he would have qualified for a higher salary than Melo.

Kobe Bryant made $30m this past season.

So calling Melo's max the Kobe or supermax suggesting it's the highest salary you can get inthe NBA is not only superfluous, it's misleading.


I don't know about STAT but Kobe's huge contract was before the new CBA. I don't think it's misleading, it's the top category.

Melo's was signed before the new CBA as well.

honestly dont see the debate here, the term didnt originate on realgm. :lol:
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
User avatar
sogood
Analyst
Posts: 3,233
And1: 5,231
Joined: Jun 27, 2013

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1367 » by sogood » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:47 am

HighRyzer83 wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:Sounds like he's coming back, so the Lakers are back to having no players or coaches or talent, nor a clear GM, and the Bulls are left with some confused lawyers, stray dogs and a knee surgery to be named later.

The Lakers would be a good team to S&T with though. Gasol, Randle, and 1st pick which will no doubt be a lottery. Possibly another future pick as well, if they want him that badly


or you know they could just sign him with their available cap space without giving up anything at all.
liknicks7
Rookie
Posts: 1,174
And1: 431
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1368 » by liknicks7 » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:47 am

Carmelo Anthony is strongly considering a move to LA, according to reports. @MarioNBCLA has details now on NBC4
9:37pm - 6 Jul 14
User avatar
LJ4pointplay
Knicks Forum GM King
Posts: 8,283
And1: 1,324
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1369 » by LJ4pointplay » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:47 am

suicidedeuce wrote:
Red Vines wrote:
suicidedeuce wrote:
Melo did not take a discount in 2011 but instead signed a max extension so his 2013-2014 salary was $21.4m 105% of that is $22.5m.

That's the ONLY his max is higher than James'. But he doesn't qualify for some special category of salary.


Lebron would qualify too then for the super-max (it is commonly called that) if he didn't take the discount. It's the very most you can make in the league which is why it has been termed that.


I know it's commonly called that, and it's commonly redundant.

I think people also commonly misunderstand how max's are calculated. There is no "Kobemax" or "supermax."

There is just the max. Not qualifier is needed.



As was pointed out, the max contract is greater depending on how long you've been in the league. Also, if you've been in the league for less than 7 years, then your max contract is greater depending on accolades such as all-star appearances.

Article 2, Section 7, (a) of the CBA if you want more information.

The supermax, or kobemax, is very effective shorthand to signal that "max" contract is one in the 20+M/year range instead of the 15M/year range. I think most everyone understands that. Unsure why you have a problem with it?
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,758
And1: 15,282
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1370 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:47 am

Capn'O wrote:I'll say it - these guys with their offseason sagas are kind of clowns.


It's become so stupid.
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,758
And1: 15,282
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1371 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:48 am

KnicksGod wrote:
Abe_505 wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:Sounds like he's coming back, so the Lakers are back to having no players or coaches or talent, nor a clear GM, and the Bulls are left with some confused lawyers, lost dogs and a knee surgery to be named later.


And yet both of those franchises have celebrated 16 championships combined since we've celebrated our last.


Yeaaaah but we got next.


Chances are really good that none of the three franchises (LA,NYK, CHi) will win one in the next decade.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,235
And1: 25,690
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1372 » by moocow007 » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:50 am

sogood wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:Sounds like he's coming back, so the Lakers are back to having no players or coaches or talent, nor a clear GM, and the Bulls are left with some confused lawyers, stray dogs and a knee surgery to be named later.

The Lakers would be a good team to S&T with though. Gasol, Randle, and 1st pick which will no doubt be a lottery. Possibly another future pick as well, if they want him that badly


or you know they could just sign him with their available cap space without giving up anything at all.


To do what? Team up with a 36 year old Bryant to be his Robin for a team with no head coach, no other players other than Randle and a busted Nash who has himself said hes basically done and a owner that hasnt exactly shown hes anything like his dad? And because Kobe is also "super maxed" wont have any real cap to build a team around?
User avatar
aq_ua
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,673
And1: 7,727
Joined: May 08, 2002
Location: Optimistic but realistic

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1373 » by aq_ua » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:50 am

Abe_505 wrote:
Capn'O wrote:I'll say it - these guys with their offseason sagas are kind of clowns.


It's become so stupid.

This is why soap operas continue to exist - people have an addiction to pointless human drama.
User avatar
LJ4pointplay
Knicks Forum GM King
Posts: 8,283
And1: 1,324
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1374 » by LJ4pointplay » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:51 am

liknicks7 wrote:Carmelo Anthony is strongly considering a move to LA, according to reports. @MarioNBCLA has details now on NBC4
9:37pm - 6 Jul 14



LOL, I'm sure that dude aint breaking any news on this front Just going to talk about what we already know.
User avatar
sogood
Analyst
Posts: 3,233
And1: 5,231
Joined: Jun 27, 2013

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1375 » by sogood » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:51 am

moocow007 wrote:
sogood wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:The Lakers would be a good team to S&T with though. Gasol, Randle, and 1st pick which will no doubt be a lottery. Possibly another future pick as well, if they want him that badly


or you know they could just sign him with their available cap space without giving up anything at all.


To do what? Team up with a 36 year old Bryant as his Robin for a team with no head coach, no other players other than Randle and a busted Nash who has himself said hes basically done and a owner that hasnt exactly shown hes anything like his dad?


Never said it was a good idea. Replying to the dude who think the Lakers needs to do a sign and trade with us to get him.
dablackprodigy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 894
And1: 326
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
 

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1376 » by dablackprodigy » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:52 am

DaGawd wrote:
dablackprodigy wrote:
Dkillanyk4lyf wrote:like i said earlier this worse than 2010.

#INPHILWETRUST!!!!


Stop with this gimmick man

Lmao he signed up just to tell you this


Honestly I did :lol: Before I was just lurking but man that was urking me :banghead: :banghead:

Fellas hopefully tomorrow will be the end of all this
User avatar
DowNY
RealGM
Posts: 13,879
And1: 10,366
Joined: Dec 19, 2010
Location: Your mom's crib, NYC
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1377 » by DowNY » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:53 am

liknicks7 wrote:Carmelo Anthony is strongly considering a move to LA, according to reports. @MarioNBCLA has details now on NBC4
9:37pm - 6 Jul 14

:lol: :lol: :lol: Just a recap of what is out there already.
suicidedeuce
And1: 0

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1378 » by suicidedeuce » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:53 am

LJ4pointplay wrote:
suicidedeuce wrote:
Red Vines wrote:
Lebron would qualify too then for the super-max (it is commonly called that) if he didn't take the discount. It's the very most you can make in the league which is why it has been termed that.


I know it's commonly called that, and it's commonly redundant.

I think people also commonly misunderstand how max's are calculated. There is no "Kobemax" or "supermax."

There is just the max. Not qualifier is needed.



As was pointed out, the max contract is greater depending on how long you've been in the league. Also, if you've been in the league for less than 7 years, then your max contract is greater depending on accolades such as all-star appearances.

Article 2, Section 7, (a) of the CBA if you want more information.

The supermax, or kobemax, is very effective shorthand to signal that "max" contract is one in the 20+M/year range instead of the 15M/year range. I think most everyone understands that. Unsure why you have a problem with it?


Because I think very often its used a a derogatory qualifier and it's often steeped in misunderstanding of how and why it's calculated, as was demonstrated by the exchange between Red Vines and I.

Everyone knows Melo's MAX starts at $22m+. There is no context in which we need the qualifier.

'Max' is more than suffiicient.
gothamknicks
Sophomore
Posts: 151
And1: 36
Joined: Oct 31, 2013
         

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1379 » by gothamknicks » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:53 am

liknicks7 wrote:Carmelo Anthony is strongly considering a move to LA, according to reports. @MarioNBCLA has details now on NBC4
9:37pm - 6 Jul 14


And there it is
User avatar
HighRyzer83
RealGM
Posts: 12,158
And1: 5,155
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Fan on Fire

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#1380 » by HighRyzer83 » Mon Jul 7, 2014 1:54 am

sogood wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:Sounds like he's coming back, so the Lakers are back to having no players or coaches or talent, nor a clear GM, and the Bulls are left with some confused lawyers, stray dogs and a knee surgery to be named later.

The Lakers would be a good team to S&T with though. Gasol, Randle, and 1st pick which will no doubt be a lottery. Possibly another future pick as well, if they want him that badly


or you know they could just sign him with their available cap space without giving up anything at all.

The most they can do is $96. They cannot offer him $129 as the knicks can in an S&T.

Return to New York Knicks