Jitpal wrote:I don't think you understand my point. Let's, for argument's sake, say that the Rockets are able to trade Yao's expiring deal and the Knicks 2012 1st for Melo. That's the deal. Nothing else. Are the Rockets with that squad getting past the Mavs, Spurs or Lakers? My opinion is no, I'm curious to hear yours.
No to LA. The other teams I'm not sure. The Rockets lack a defensive big and someone to close games. After that trade our lineup would be:
C-Miller/Hayes
PF-Scola/Hill/Patterson
SF-Melo/Battier/Budinger
SG-Martin/Lee/Williams
PG-Brooks/Lowry
That's a very good team. I wouldn't be surprised to see that team make a run for the WCF's. You are basically adding Melo to a squad that went 42-40 last year, with no closer. And the team still has redundant pieces and TE's to obtain another big. Don't forget Brooks has missed 24 games this season.
Jitpal wrote:Then, the following season, when Melo inevitably leaves where do the Rockets go? You have the same cap space as you would have before with just Yao leaving.
This isn't true. Yao counts as a caphold until his rights are renounced.
Jitpal wrote:Your own pick for the 2010-2011 season is worse, because you played better with Melo. Plus, you've given up the Knicks 2012 pick. Leaving you with fewer assets and the same cap space as you would have anyway. Where do the Rockets go? -Jitpal
That's assuming Melo says forget my money, and just walks to NY to sign for less. I'm not saying he won't. I personally think he will want his money. The team would be hedging that they could get something from NY or whoever he signs with. So you are leaving that potential haul out of your equation, which could include a player, a large TE or draft rights. Capspace allows you to get free agents, asusming you can convince them to sign with you. A large TE allows you to get good players that a team wants to get rid of, ala Al Jefferson last summer. Wouldn't it be better to have capspace and a large TE?