ImageImageImageImageImage

2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome)

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Who are you voting for?

Donald Trump
29
28%
Joe Biden
63
60%
Howie Hawkins
4
4%
Jo Jorgensen
3
3%
Kanye West
6
6%
 
Total votes: 105

User avatar
bishnykfan
Knicks Forum Game Commish
Posts: 16,626
And1: 15,520
Joined: Jan 10, 2002
Location: Upstate NY

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#141 » by bishnykfan » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:08 am

mpharris36 wrote:I think as bish said. Antifa is just a term. Call them anarchist whatever you want. They just want to burn western civilization. From the tip of the iceberg we only see 18 year old punks with gas masks that turn peacefull prostests into riots for a reason. It not only delutes the protests purposes (which is wrong because peaceful protesting is important in this country) it destorys small own businesses in those cities and peoples homes.

Whether the rioters call themselves "Antifa" or not and whether they are funded or organized or not isn't even all that relevant to me. There is an awful lot of fascist behavior in their actions. When your purpose is to negatively disrupt society for the citizens of an area while being allowed and sometimes encouraged to do so by the local leaders the blame falling on whoever is in the White House at the time doesn't seem to compute. Whether that is Obama during Baltimore/Ferguson or Trump now. The job of keeping order is a local job. The local leaders need to protect their citizens. If they can't they should call the Federal government in for assistance. Fact is that most democratic leader are not doing that right now whoever it is that is causing the damage in these cities.
All-Time Draft

PG- Oscar Robertson/Bob Cousy
SG- Earl Monroe/James Harden/Dana Barros
SF- Billy Cunningham/Michael Finley/Chet Walker
PF- Elvin Hayes/Dolph Schayes/Tom Chambers/Danny Manning
C- Walt Bellamy/Neil Johnston/Darryl Dawkins
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#142 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:20 am

bishnykfan wrote:
Whether the rioters call themselves "Antifa" or not and whether they are funded or organized or not isn't even all that relevant to me. There is an awful lot of fascist behavior in their actions. When your purpose is to negatively disrupt society for the citizens of an area while being allowed and sometimes encouraged to do so by the local leaders the blame falling on whoever is in the White House at the time doesn't seem to compute.


Fascism is authoritarian rule

Anarchism is not fascism

The term Anarchist does not always = violent action

The problem with the terminology is Anarchism can be a philosophy that is peaceful, but the wold Anarchy does imply chaos and destruction

I do think there are disruptive chaos agents who set fires. They are not generally going to be actual Anarchists which in my experience are bookish, philosophical people who oppose oppression.

Unfortunately, the language is muddled now so it makes it even harder to discuss the people who fck chit up without calling them Anarchists which in these situations are people who disrupt to create chaos

And this has everything to do with why the White House sent in troops. Their response was not done to bring peace and order. It was done to stoke the flames and agitate and create more riots and destruction. It is beyond obvious Trump is antagonizing protestors, not defending local turf.

So framing this as the failure of local authorities thus justifying Trump stepping is a bogus argument. Trump's actions didn't improve anything, it was just him stirring the pot. Trump doesn't do anything for any reason than what serves his own self-interests and his intention is to create more chaos, not less.

So there it is, the real irony of all this. Chaos agents aid Trump.
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 113,026
And1: 117,264
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#143 » by mpharris36 » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:21 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Yeah but you're still pushing the phrase Antifa as if there is an organization in America presently operating that handles the logistics of where to burn and when as the handiwork of a centralized group called Antifa. There is not

Whether or not anyone presently identifies someone else as Antifa or if someone says "I'm Antifa" there is no organized threat to American called Antifa

Antifa as a term is a presently only valid as a cartoon word used by the right to stoke fear



I think as bish said. Antifa is just a term. Call them anarchist whatever you want. They just want to burn western civilization. From the tip of the iceberg we only see 18 year old punks with gas masks that turn peacefull prostests into riots for a reason. It not only delutes the protests purposes (which is wrong because peaceful protesting is important in this country) it destorys small own businesses in those cities and peoples homes.


I completely agree with you that it is wrong and counter-productive. It pisses me off.

You may recall I was attacked quite visciously in the George Floyd thread because I was the only one who stood up and said don't burn down your bodega, it isn't right. I was called a white supremacist and the enemy of black people and Whitey for sticking my nose into black peoples' anger. FCK THAT! I know right and wrong and I do not believe in By Any Means Necessary until you have exhausted the better options which using the system to ensure legit law and order and bringing bad guys to justice. In that case, the bad guys are the cops. In this case, it may be an arsonist. And both are wrong.

So I'm a big believer in mass protest and I think it will triumph over the present evils which are vastly more dangerous than worrying about the actions of a handful of nihilist destructive aholes who make it hard for everyone.

My point is Trump wants aholes to set fires. Not every one of those arsonists is just a random person, but the opposition creating chaos to stoke the Trump law and order theme. Antifa as an organized threat is BS. End of story AFAIK



I agreed with almost everything you said up until the last point. Trump wants a-holes to set fires to then lobby for leaders of those cities to allow his "agents" to go in a scoop up the anarchist later? That just seems a little wacky to me. The burning cities doesn't shed a positive light on him and that plan "in theory" would only work if he forced his way into those cities. He's literally pleading to come in and help because burnging cities makes him look bad. If he wanted to as Stannis pointed out he could in theory use the Insurrection Act without consent but he hasn't.

I think you are giving trump way too much credit :lol:

Your talking to a moderate, let me say he isn't that smart, even if he would like to tell you he is.
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#144 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:26 am

mpharris36 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

I think as bish said. Antifa is just a term. Call them anarchist whatever you want. They just want to burn western civilization. From the tip of the iceberg we only see 18 year old punks with gas masks that turn peacefull prostests into riots for a reason. It not only delutes the protests purposes (which is wrong because peaceful protesting is important in this country) it destorys small own businesses in those cities and peoples homes.


I completely agree with you that it is wrong and counter-productive. It pisses me off.

You may recall I was attacked quite visciously in the George Floyd thread because I was the only one who stood up and said don't burn down your bodega, it isn't right. I was called a white supremacist and the enemy of black people and Whitey for sticking my nose into black peoples' anger. FCK THAT! I know right and wrong and I do not believe in By Any Means Necessary until you have exhausted the better options which using the system to ensure legit law and order and bringing bad guys to justice. In that case, the bad guys are the cops. In this case, it may be an arsonist. And both are wrong.

So I'm a big believer in mass protest and I think it will triumph over the present evils which are vastly more dangerous than worrying about the actions of a handful of nihilist destructive aholes who make it hard for everyone.

My point is Trump wants aholes to set fires. Not every one of those arsonists is just a random person, but the opposition creating chaos to stoke the Trump law and order theme. Antifa as an organized threat is BS. End of story AFAIK



I agreed with almost everything you said up until the last point. Trump wants a-holes to set fires to then lobby for leaders of those cities to allow his "agents" to go in a scoop up the anarchist later? That just seems a little wacky to me. The burning cities doesn't shed a positive light on him and that plan "in theory" would only work if he forced his way into those cities. He's literally pleading to come in and help because burnging cities makes him look bad. If he wanted to as Stannis pointed out he could in theory use the Insurrection Act without consent but he hasn't.

I think you are giving trump way too much credit :lol:

Your talking to a moderate, let me say he isn't that smart, even if he would like to tell you he is.


Being that literal minded doesn't help you understand Trump. I've studied him. His whole life is an exercise in creating chaos. One of the former WH insiders said Trump has the most chaotic management style (as in none, just raw impulse, no research or input from experts required) he had ever seen. That is basically all Trump understands. I could write a fresh essay to explain it, but you should flip the script and listen to me. I understand what he is doing and he wants mayhem. If you really think he wants literal law and order you've been suckered. Fascists create disorder in order to take control. That's what he's attempting to do. I don't think it could be any more obvious, so think about it some more.
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 113,026
And1: 117,264
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#145 » by mpharris36 » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:35 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
I completely agree with you that it is wrong and counter-productive. It pisses me off.

You may recall I was attacked quite visciously in the George Floyd thread because I was the only one who stood up and said don't burn down your bodega, it isn't right. I was called a white supremacist and the enemy of black people and Whitey for sticking my nose into black peoples' anger. FCK THAT! I know right and wrong and I do not believe in By Any Means Necessary until you have exhausted the better options which using the system to ensure legit law and order and bringing bad guys to justice. In that case, the bad guys are the cops. In this case, it may be an arsonist. And both are wrong.

So I'm a big believer in mass protest and I think it will triumph over the present evils which are vastly more dangerous than worrying about the actions of a handful of nihilist destructive aholes who make it hard for everyone.

My point is Trump wants aholes to set fires. Not every one of those arsonists is just a random person, but the opposition creating chaos to stoke the Trump law and order theme. Antifa as an organized threat is BS. End of story AFAIK



I agreed with almost everything you said up until the last point. Trump wants a-holes to set fires to then lobby for leaders of those cities to allow his "agents" to go in a scoop up the anarchist later? That just seems a little wacky to me. The burning cities doesn't shed a positive light on him and that plan "in theory" would only work if he forced his way into those cities. He's literally pleading to come in and help because burnging cities makes him look bad. If he wanted to as Stannis pointed out he could in theory use the Insurrection Act without consent but he hasn't.

I think you are giving trump way too much credit :lol:

Your talking to a moderate, let me say he isn't that smart, even if he would like to tell you he is.


Being that literal minded doesn't help you understand Trump. I've studied him. His whole life is an exercise in creating chaos. One of the former WH insiders said Trump has the most chaotic management style (as in none, just raw impulse, no research or input from experts required) he had ever seen. That is basically all Trump understands. I could write a fresh essay to explain it, but you should flip the script and listen to me. I understand what he is doing and he wants mayhem. If you really think he wants literal law and order you've been suckered. Fascists create disorder in order to take control. That's what he's attempting to do. I don't think it could be any more obvious, so think about it some more.


I appreciate the dialog. I don't think the protestors outside the white house during the RNC and trumps speech he was too pleased about :lol: did you hear the air horn? They also nearly trampled over Rand Paul and his wife and flipping off 80 year old ladies.

If that is what he wants...its backfiring on him :lol:
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
The Lamma
Veteran
Posts: 2,743
And1: 5,642
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
Location: Goonga galunga
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#146 » by The Lamma » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:45 am

If it were up to me, it would be Stephen Colbert for President, and Dave Grohl for VP. Obviously celebrities are fit for election in this f**ked country, so why not a brilliant, balanced one, instead of a deranged orange lunatic? One that is tuned in with all the goings on. And Dave backing him up with FooFighters jams at all meetings, and just the coolest dude on the planet, aside from being a righteous dude in every way. No, I'm not kidding. Colbert/Grohl 2020.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 40,138
And1: 57,693
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#147 » by robillionaire » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:52 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
I understand what he is doing and he wants mayhem. If you really think he wants literal law and order you've been suckered. Fascists create disorder in order to take control. That's what he's attempting to do. I don't think it could be any more obvious, so think about it some more.


He wants mayhem but only as an excuse to justify the law and order crackdowns of any dissent to his rule that would follow the mayhem, to make him seem like an powerful authoritarian strongman who crushed the movement. Because that's what leaders like him do. But he first needs it to be viewed as justified in the public eye.

Clyde_Style wrote:
And this has everything to do with why the White House sent in troops. Their response was not done to bring peace and order. It was done to stoke the flames and agitate and create more riots and destruction. It is beyond obvious Trump is antagonizing protestors, not defending local turf.

So framing this as the failure of local authorities thus justifying Trump stepping is a bogus argument. Trump's actions didn't improve anything, it was just him stirring the pot. Trump doesn't do anything for any reason than what serves his own self-interests and his intention is to create more chaos, not less.


Pretty much. The more atrocities they commit against the people the more people see it and say enough is enough

Trump is lying when he tells people that only he can stop the protests and riots and he's the only thing standing in their way. Not only will he not do that, they will be 100x worse in the next 4 years under Trump and he's a big reason they even exist. The more he tries to use force to stop them the more people will be energized to keep protesting. He tried to send in his secret police in Portland after things had mostly calmed down. Because again he desperately wants to be known as the strongman that ended the protests and crushed BLM. But it only made things much much worse and got the whole city out on the streets from veterans to moms to stand against them.

It's just untrue that these Mayors didn't try to stop them. DeBlasio tried everything he could, he has allowed the nypd to do whatever they want to protesters, tried days of the unjust curfew to give them an excuse to attack anybody they want, they are using gas and weapons of war, vehicular attacks, taking people's eyes and limbs with rubber bullets, but it still didn't work because there are too many protesters and everything they tried to do just outraged the community more and more. Because ultimately, the cause is just and many people can feel that.

When the fascists come to your town and you counter-protest, you're officially "antifa" at that point, which isn't even an actual organization with members or leaders. The fascist groups (the traditionalist workers party, league of the south, identity evropa, the NSM and other affiliated groups, literal nazis, with swastikas) came to my hometown in Pikeville Kentucky several years back, a little bit before Charlottesville happened actually, and they were also joined by the 3% militia carrying a bunch of assault rifles because they needed to "protect free speech" aka nazi speech. They came to spread white supremacist propaganda and recruit. Many of us didn't want them in our town, mostly young people at the local college and a church, and held a counter demonstration across the street to drown them out with signs and noisemakers. These are the people the right designates as terrorists, people who refuse to allow the fascist groups emboldened by the Trump presidency people to proliferate their genocidal ideology, whenever a community comes out to oppose fascist organizing and prevent them from recruiting and spreading. I'm proud to get out there and let these groups know they won't operate unopposed, so yeah I'm anti-fascist. The president of antifa actually.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 40,138
And1: 57,693
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#148 » by robillionaire » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:55 am

The Lamma wrote:If it were up to me, it would be Stephen Colbert for President, and Dave Grohl for VP. Obviously celebrities are fit for election in this f**ked country, so why not a brilliant, balanced one, instead of a deranged orange lunatic? One that is tuned in with all the goings on. And Dave backing him up with FooFighters jams at all meetings, and just the coolest dude on the planet, aside from being a righteous dude in every way. No, I'm not kidding. Colbert/Grohl 2020.


If it's going to be a comedian can we just find out where jon stewart is hiding
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,202
And1: 24,501
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#149 » by Pointgod » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:55 am

mpharris36 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

I think as bish said. Antifa is just a term. Call them anarchist whatever you want. They just want to burn western civilization. From the tip of the iceberg we only see 18 year old punks with gas masks that turn peacefull prostests into riots for a reason. It not only delutes the protests purposes (which is wrong because peaceful protesting is important in this country) it destorys small own businesses in those cities and peoples homes.


I completely agree with you that it is wrong and counter-productive. It pisses me off.

You may recall I was attacked quite visciously in the George Floyd thread because I was the only one who stood up and said don't burn down your bodega, it isn't right. I was called a white supremacist and the enemy of black people and Whitey for sticking my nose into black peoples' anger. FCK THAT! I know right and wrong and I do not believe in By Any Means Necessary until you have exhausted the better options which using the system to ensure legit law and order and bringing bad guys to justice. In that case, the bad guys are the cops. In this case, it may be an arsonist. And both are wrong.

So I'm a big believer in mass protest and I think it will triumph over the present evils which are vastly more dangerous than worrying about the actions of a handful of nihilist destructive aholes who make it hard for everyone.

My point is Trump wants aholes to set fires. Not every one of those arsonists is just a random person, but the opposition creating chaos to stoke the Trump law and order theme. Antifa as an organized threat is BS. End of story AFAIK



I agreed with almost everything you said up until the last point. Trump wants a-holes to set fires to then lobby for leaders of those cities to allow his "agents" to go in a scoop up the anarchist later? That just seems a little wacky to me. The burning cities doesn't shed a positive light on him and that plan "in theory" would only work if he forced his way into those cities. He's literally pleading to come in and help because burnging cities makes him look bad. If he wanted to as Stannis pointed out he could in theory use the Insurrection Act without consent but he hasn't.

I think you are giving trump way too much credit :lol:

Your talking to a moderate, let me say he isn't that smart, even if he would like to tell you he is.


Here’s a simple guide to understanding Trump. Everything with him is a “production”, having the biggest crowds, getting the most viewers. He’s a reality show conman through and through. He doesn’t give a damn about addressing problems or solving ****. Take Portland for example. It was widely known that the protests had died down, but Trump sent Federal Troops there to escalate and antagonize the protestors because he wanted the appearance of a “strong leader”. Think about it. A normally, non sociopathic human being would at least show some empathy, but stress the need for people to protest peacefully. When the national guard protected the Federal courthouse there was less violence.

I have a hard time believing that any of the protestors or agitators are paid, but there’s definitely evidence that right wingers and white nationalists have discussed infiltrating the protestors to escalate violence. so I wouldnt be surprised if some hair brained people thought that burning Democratic cities would make Trump look better and Trump and the right wing media of course play along.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#150 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:55 am

mpharris36 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

I agreed with almost everything you said up until the last point. Trump wants a-holes to set fires to then lobby for leaders of those cities to allow his "agents" to go in a scoop up the anarchist later? That just seems a little wacky to me. The burning cities doesn't shed a positive light on him and that plan "in theory" would only work if he forced his way into those cities. He's literally pleading to come in and help because burnging cities makes him look bad. If he wanted to as Stannis pointed out he could in theory use the Insurrection Act without consent but he hasn't.

I think you are giving trump way too much credit :lol:

Your talking to a moderate, let me say he isn't that smart, even if he would like to tell you he is.


Being that literal minded doesn't help you understand Trump. I've studied him. His whole life is an exercise in creating chaos. One of the former WH insiders said Trump has the most chaotic management style (as in none, just raw impulse, no research or input from experts required) he had ever seen. That is basically all Trump understands. I could write a fresh essay to explain it, but you should flip the script and listen to me. I understand what he is doing and he wants mayhem. If you really think he wants literal law and order you've been suckered. Fascists create disorder in order to take control. That's what he's attempting to do. I don't think it could be any more obvious, so think about it some more.


I appreciate the dialog. I don't think the protestors outside the white house during the RNC and trumps speech he was too pleased about :lol: did you hear the air horn? They also nearly trampled over Rand Paul and his wife and flipping off 80 year old ladies.

If that is what he wants...its backfiring on him :lol:


Yes, it is backfiring on him.

Remember, he is continually agitating for his followers to commit violence. The kid in Kenosha is not the first instance of that.

You may not recall, but early in his term a lone gunman broke into a newsroom and slaughtered five employees at The Capital Gazette in Maryland. He was a Trump follower. Trump actively stoked this kind of behavior by unrelentingly calling the media The Enemy of The People which is dog whistle language for kill the journalists. During his 2016 campaign, they employed enforcers with Nazi tattoos to keep journalists at his rallies confined to fenced in areas.

Trump's whole agenda is fueled by provoking anger, fear and rageful responses. He wants people to tear themselves apart under the misguided notion that the majority will flock to him for protection. Except there is probably a majority that clearly sees he is the one stoking this violence and are not taking the bait. Don't take the bait MPH
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#151 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:59 am

robillionaire wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
I understand what he is doing and he wants mayhem. If you really think he wants literal law and order you've been suckered. Fascists create disorder in order to take control. That's what he's attempting to do. I don't think it could be any more obvious, so think about it some more.


He wants mayhem but only as an excuse to justify the law and order crackdowns of any dissent to his rule that would follow the mayhem, to make him seem like an powerful authoritarian strongman who crushed the movement. Because that's what leaders like him do. But he first needs it to be viewed as justified in the public eye.

Clyde_Style wrote:
And this has everything to do with why the White House sent in troops. Their response was not done to bring peace and order. It was done to stoke the flames and agitate and create more riots and destruction. It is beyond obvious Trump is antagonizing protestors, not defending local turf.

So framing this as the failure of local authorities thus justifying Trump stepping is a bogus argument. Trump's actions didn't improve anything, it was just him stirring the pot. Trump doesn't do anything for any reason than what serves his own self-interests and his intention is to create more chaos, not less.


Pretty much. The more atrocities they commit against the people the more people see it and say enough is enough

Trump is lying when he tells people that only he can stop the protests and riots and he's the only thing standing in their way. Not only will he not do that, they will be 100x worse in the next 4 years under Trump and he's a big reason they even exist. The more he tries to use force to stop them the more people will be energized to keep protesting. He tried to send in his secret police in Portland after things had mostly calmed down. Because again he desperately wants to be known as the strongman that ended the protests and crushed BLM. But it only made things much much worse and got the whole city out on the streets from veterans to moms to stand against them.

It's just untrue that these Mayors didn't try to stop them. DeBlasio tried everything he could, he has allowed the nypd to do whatever they want to protesters, tried days of the unjust curfew to give them an excuse to attack anybody they want, they are using gas and weapons of war, vehicular attacks, taking people's eyes and limbs with rubber bullets, but it still didn't work because there are too many protesters and everything they tried to do just outraged the community more and more. Because ultimately, the cause is just and many people can feel that.

When the fascists come to your town and you counter-protest, you're officially "antifa" at that point, which isn't even an actual organization with members or leaders. The fascist groups (the traditionalist workers party, league of the south, identity evropa, the NSM and other affiliated groups, literal nazis, with swastikas) came to my hometown in Pikeville Kentucky several years back, a little bit before Charlottesville happened actually, and they were also joined by the 3% militia carrying a bunch of assault rifles because they needed to "protect free speech" aka nazi speech. They came to spread white supremacist propaganda and recruit. Many of us didn't want them in our town, mostly young people at the local college and a church, and held a counter demonstration across the street to drown them out with signs and noisemakers. These are the people the right designates as terrorists, people who refuse to allow the fascist groups emboldened by the Trump presidency people to proliferate their genocidal ideology, whenever a community comes out to oppose fascist organizing and prevent them from recruiting and spreading. I'm proud to get out there and let these groups know they won't operate unopposed, so yeah I'm anti-fascist. The president of antifa actually.


Yes, well said.

I acknowledge you as a real anti-fascist
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#152 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:00 am

The Lamma wrote:If it were up to me, it would be Stephen Colbert for President, and Dave Grohl for VP. Obviously celebrities are fit for election in this f**ked country, so why not a brilliant, balanced one, instead of a deranged orange lunatic? One that is tuned in with all the goings on. And Dave backing him up with FooFighters jams at all meetings, and just the coolest dude on the planet, aside from being a righteous dude in every way. No, I'm not kidding. Colbert/Grohl 2020.


I'll take them over Oprah
User avatar
The Lamma
Veteran
Posts: 2,743
And1: 5,642
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
Location: Goonga galunga
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#153 » by The Lamma » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:06 am

robillionaire wrote:
The Lamma wrote:If it were up to me, it would be Stephen Colbert for President, and Dave Grohl for VP. Obviously celebrities are fit for election in this f**ked country, so why not a brilliant, balanced one, instead of a deranged orange lunatic? One that is tuned in with all the goings on. And Dave backing him up with FooFighters jams at all meetings, and just the coolest dude on the planet, aside from being a righteous dude in every way. No, I'm not kidding. Colbert/Grohl 2020.


If it's going to be a comedian can we just find out where jon stewart is hiding


Equally interested in a Stewart/Colbert pairing. Sign me up. It's like the Bucks offering Giannis for a future 2nd rounder
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,648
And1: 110,792
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#154 » by Capn'O » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:08 am

The Lamma wrote:If it were up to me, it would be Stephen Colbert for President, and Dave Grohl for VP. Obviously celebrities are fit for election in this f**ked country, so why not a brilliant, balanced one, instead of a deranged orange lunatic? One that is tuned in with all the goings on. And Dave backing him up with FooFighters jams at all meetings, and just the coolest dude on the planet, aside from being a righteous dude in every way. No, I'm not kidding. Colbert/Grohl 2020.


I want a Waits/Badu ticket in either order.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

:beer:
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,648
And1: 110,792
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#155 » by Capn'O » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:09 am

Trevor Noah over Stewart. Yeah. I said it.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

:beer:
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#156 » by HarthorneWingo » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:10 am

robillionaire wrote:
The Lamma wrote:If it were up to me, it would be Stephen Colbert for President, and Dave Grohl for VP. Obviously celebrities are fit for election in this f**ked country, so why not a brilliant, balanced one, instead of a deranged orange lunatic? One that is tuned in with all the goings on. And Dave backing him up with FooFighters jams at all meetings, and just the coolest dude on the planet, aside from being a righteous dude in every way. No, I'm not kidding. Colbert/Grohl 2020.


If it's going to be a comedian can we just find out where jon stewart is hiding


Stevie Wonder 4 President!

Keith Richards 4 VP
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#157 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:13 am

Pointgod wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
I completely agree with you that it is wrong and counter-productive. It pisses me off.

You may recall I was attacked quite visciously in the George Floyd thread because I was the only one who stood up and said don't burn down your bodega, it isn't right. I was called a white supremacist and the enemy of black people and Whitey for sticking my nose into black peoples' anger. FCK THAT! I know right and wrong and I do not believe in By Any Means Necessary until you have exhausted the better options which using the system to ensure legit law and order and bringing bad guys to justice. In that case, the bad guys are the cops. In this case, it may be an arsonist. And both are wrong.

So I'm a big believer in mass protest and I think it will triumph over the present evils which are vastly more dangerous than worrying about the actions of a handful of nihilist destructive aholes who make it hard for everyone.

My point is Trump wants aholes to set fires. Not every one of those arsonists is just a random person, but the opposition creating chaos to stoke the Trump law and order theme. Antifa as an organized threat is BS. End of story AFAIK



I agreed with almost everything you said up until the last point. Trump wants a-holes to set fires to then lobby for leaders of those cities to allow his "agents" to go in a scoop up the anarchist later? That just seems a little wacky to me. The burning cities doesn't shed a positive light on him and that plan "in theory" would only work if he forced his way into those cities. He's literally pleading to come in and help because burnging cities makes him look bad. If he wanted to as Stannis pointed out he could in theory use the Insurrection Act without consent but he hasn't.

I think you are giving trump way too much credit :lol:

Your talking to a moderate, let me say he isn't that smart, even if he would like to tell you he is.


Here’s a simple guide to understanding Trump. Everything with him is a “production”, having the biggest crowds, getting the most viewers. He’s a reality show conman through and through. He doesn’t give a damn about addressing problems or solving ****. Take Portland for example. It was widely known that the protests had died down, but Trump sent Federal Troops there to escalate and antagonize the protestors because he wanted the appearance of a “strong leader”. Think about it. A normally, non sociopathic human being would at least show some empathy, but stress the need for people to protest peacefully. When the national guard protected the Federal courthouse there was less violence.

I have a hard time believing that any of the protestors or agitators are paid, but there’s definitely evidence that right wingers and white nationalists have discussed infiltrating the protestors to escalate violence. so I wouldnt be surprised if some hair brained people thought that burning Democratic cities would make Trump look better and Trump and the right wing media of course play along.


I'll tell you what would concern Trump more than whether or not the City of Portland actually needs his assistance. What matters is his niece Mary L. Trump has already sold more books than Art of the Deal has sold in several decades. Now that's just wrong!

Trump only exists for ratings or what he perceives will help them. He is stupid so he is usually wrong, but everything he does is for vanity alone. The man doesn't have an empathetic bone in his body.

Oh, that reminds me:
Spoiler:
Image
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,648
And1: 110,792
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#158 » by Capn'O » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:13 am

There's a song and dance between the local authorities, radical left, and mainstream left that the Feds involvement just pissed all over. They also were apparently just stopping random people of color within any remotely close distance of their buildings. The argument of whether Feds should have been involved or looped in is a fair one but not relevant to what actually happened. It was a complete farce and abuse of power.

I used to think Pence would be just as bad in his own way but he's at least a grown up and stepped in to work something out with Kate Brown to de-escalate the situation. He at least understands the gravity of the office. A basic modicrum of competence.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

:beer:
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#159 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:15 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
The Lamma wrote:If it were up to me, it would be Stephen Colbert for President, and Dave Grohl for VP. Obviously celebrities are fit for election in this f**ked country, so why not a brilliant, balanced one, instead of a deranged orange lunatic? One that is tuned in with all the goings on. And Dave backing him up with FooFighters jams at all meetings, and just the coolest dude on the planet, aside from being a righteous dude in every way. No, I'm not kidding. Colbert/Grohl 2020.


If it's going to be a comedian can we just find out where jon stewart is hiding


Stevie Wonder 4 President!

Keith Richards 4 VP


I thought you didn't want to vote for really old white men. Keith is Jurassic old
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,600
And1: 30,800
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election (All Serious POVs Welcome) 

Post#160 » by Jeff Van Gully » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:24 am

mpharris36 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

I think as bish said. Antifa is just a term. Call them anarchist whatever you want. They just want to burn western civilization. From the tip of the iceberg we only see 18 year old punks with gas masks that turn peacefull prostests into riots for a reason. It not only delutes the protests purposes (which is wrong because peaceful protesting is important in this country) it destorys small own businesses in those cities and peoples homes.


I completely agree with you that it is wrong and counter-productive. It pisses me off.

You may recall I was attacked quite visciously in the George Floyd thread because I was the only one who stood up and said don't burn down your bodega, it isn't right. I was called a white supremacist and the enemy of black people and Whitey for sticking my nose into black peoples' anger. FCK THAT! I know right and wrong and I do not believe in By Any Means Necessary until you have exhausted the better options which using the system to ensure legit law and order and bringing bad guys to justice. In that case, the bad guys are the cops. In this case, it may be an arsonist. And both are wrong.

So I'm a big believer in mass protest and I think it will triumph over the present evils which are vastly more dangerous than worrying about the actions of a handful of nihilist destructive aholes who make it hard for everyone.

My point is Trump wants aholes to set fires. Not every one of those arsonists is just a random person, but the opposition creating chaos to stoke the Trump law and order theme. Antifa as an organized threat is BS. End of story AFAIK



I agreed with almost everything you said up until the last point. Trump wants a-holes to set fires to then lobby for leaders of those cities to allow his "agents" to go in a scoop up the anarchist later? That just seems a little wacky to me. The burning cities doesn't shed a positive light on him and that plan "in theory" would only work if he forced his way into those cities. He's literally pleading to come in and help because burnging cities makes him look bad. If he wanted to as Stannis pointed out he could in theory use the Insurrection Act without consent but he hasn't.

I think you are giving trump way too much credit :lol:

Your talking to a moderate, let me say he isn't that smart, even if he would like to tell you he is.


i find it interesting that you find this idea far fetched, but subscribe to the antifa big shadow organization conspiracy theory. as robillionaire put so well, the antifa you refer to is merely pockets of people who loosely organize on social media and challenge those they identify to be fascists. and by definition, every american should be anti-fascism and thus antifa. :dontknow:
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale

Return to New York Knicks