2010 wrote:Knox struggles to put together a full game of offensive success. he always has a good half then disappears.
He’s got the talent but he doesn’t have the brain he’s such a simple player.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
2010 wrote:Knox struggles to put together a full game of offensive success. he always has a good half then disappears.
Synciere wrote:2010 wrote:K-DOT wrote:I mean, they all want to win, but wanting to win and being able to to win are two different things
You're right though, the issue is we've just not even tried to get an even decent PG. We don't go after VanVleet in the offseason, don't draft one at 8, and don't get aggressive enough to move up for LaMelo. I know people hate when I say this, but even if Obi is really good, we probably should have taken Haliburton over him because he's just a much bigger need and has a much clearer role on a good team
But even with the roster as-is, the issue is (as I said to start the year) that Payton is in a vacuum the "best" PG on the team, but when you look at how guys play with each other, he's a pretty bad fit. Even though Rivers is not really a PG and arguably not even really better than Payton, he's just a much better fit at starting PG for us
I think coaches focus too much on individual play, and not group play, how guys play with certain other players. Cause especially for a team full of players as flawed as our are, you can't just ignore fit and throw out the 5 "best" guys at once, you have to look at 5-man units as a whole.
Bro, I was PLEADING for them to either be aggressive and trade up for LaMelo or stand pat and take Haliburton. I had them as the clear top two PGs. We did neither.
In a vacuum I agre le with you but the draft is supposed to be drafting for the next decade, not the next year. Free agency is for needs. It’s clear their move for a point guard was moving up a few spots for IQ.

2010 wrote:Mitch as show the most adaptability and response to coaching of all our young players. Dude went from a foul machine to really curbing it within the first 10 games. He needs more scoring opportunities now (with his efficiency) and he needs freedom to shoot the 3. The coaching staff has to encourage it. Even if it doesn't bear fruit now, it'll prove beneficial by time this team is actually good (assuming he'll still be here by then).
Thibs is trying to defy faith many have tried none have succeeded.seren wrote:I like Thibs' thinking. He will get the vets injured with heavy minutes and he will be "forced" to go all youth. Smart.
mpharris36 wrote:2010 wrote:Mitch as show the most adaptability and response to coaching of all our young players. Dude went from a foul machine to really curbing it within the first 10 games. He needs more scoring opportunities now (with his efficiency) and he needs freedom to shoot the 3. The coaching staff has to encourage it. Even if it doesn't bear fruit now, it'll prove beneficial by time this team is actually good (assuming he'll still be here by then).
we don't run a single high P&R with him all game...smh

JBreezeNY wrote:dakomish23 wrote:These games are so much better when you just look for the positives with the kids
LaMelo would have been nice though
True, unfortunately the kids suck
Quickley needs some time though, I see the potential but I also see why he was selected in the second round.

Who cares enjoy the losses the tank speeding up let's hope it beats other teams tankCharlesOakley wrote:The worst part of the game for me is we kept the starts in with less than 3 minutes left. I don't understand piling up minutes in clear losses. No reporter dares ask why.

K-DOT wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:El Poochio wrote:
If you make 3 pointers worth 4 and 2 pointers worth 3 math changes
He's actually right though
The problem with basketball is a math problem
3 pointers are just way more valuable than most 2 pointers because they're worth 50% more. A 50% 2pt shooter is worth a 33% 3pt shooter, and it's far easier to find a guy who can shoot 33% from 3 than a guy who can shoot 50% from 2. For instance, last year there were 82 players who shot over 50% from 2, and 135 who shot over 33% from 3
If you change it so it's 4 pointers and 3 pointers, what's now a 3pt shot is only worth 33% more than what's now a 2pt shot. The math then becomes a 50% 3pt shooter is worth a 37.5% 4pt shooter, which is still relatively common, but much closer to the 50% mark, where 71 players shot over 37.5% from 3 last year
It's kinda stupid, but that's really the only way to even it out.
2010 wrote:Immanuel Brickley!!!
• Garbage floater
• Scared to shoot when contested, pump fake fiend
• Cannot shoot off the dribble
• Low shot release

2010 wrote:Bro, I was PLEADING for them to either be aggressive and trade up for LaMelo or stand pat and take Haliburton. I had them as the clear top two PGs. We did neither.

2010 wrote:mpharris36 wrote:2010 wrote:Mitch as show the most adaptability and response to coaching of all our young players. Dude went from a foul machine to really curbing it within the first 10 games. He needs more scoring opportunities now (with his efficiency) and he needs freedom to shoot the 3. The coaching staff has to encourage it. Even if it doesn't bear fruit now, it'll prove beneficial by time this team is actually good (assuming he'll still be here by then).
we don't run a single high P&R with him all game...smh
The in-bounds play for the ally off the pass from Knox was nice. We need a lot more of that.
2010 wrote:Synciere wrote:2010 wrote:
Bro, I was PLEADING for them to either be aggressive and trade up for LaMelo or stand pat and take Haliburton. I had them as the clear top two PGs. We did neither.
In a vacuum I agre le with you but the draft is supposed to be drafting for the next decade, not the next year. Free agency is for needs. It’s clear their move for a point guard was moving up a few spots for IQ.
IQ is not the type of PG who can be a floor leader and an engine for a team. He's a combo guard.
BBALLER4FR wrote:Commish needs to postpone the season. Covid is a BIG problem!!
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.