ImageImageImageImageImage

Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE)

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,946
And1: 6,003
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1401 » by R-DAWG » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:03 pm

Capn'O wrote:
j4remi wrote:
PMFJB wrote:That link is from 2008. So I am going to play devil's advocate. We have 5 more years of drafts since then which have provided the following in the top 4:
2009 Thabeet, Tyreke Evans
2010 Evan Turner, Wesley Johnson
2011 Derrick Williams, Enes Kanter
2012 MKG, Waiters
2013 Bennett, Porter, Zeller

If we end up with the equivalent of any of those players with our pick I am going to be upset.

So if we fail with our pick (possible) then our whole plan is get everyone and anyone in free agency. That never works out. Ever.

We need to get more assets and not just give away players for cap space. If he would have received a late 1st rounder I would be happy. But to just give away players for 6 million more doesn't sit too well for me.


It's definitely a valid concern, but bare in mind that the top 3 prospects this year are close to can't miss status. So the odds are in our favor on this one whereas some of the guys above were in weak classes or blatant reaches.

As for just giving away Shump, we got rid of JR with him which replaces the return of a first but it equates to about 11 million in cap space which is enough to sign a player with an impact rating above those of typical late picks. The other thing is that if we made it through the deadline without finding a first for Shump, we'd be looking at giving him up for nothing. The time to deal him for a pick was last year before Phil came on (though you could blame him if you think his advisory role was key to that not happening which is a possibility) but at this point...between his lack of improvement, yearly injury time and RFA status, his value was probably less than anyone would like to think. It's not a home run move, but it fits with the whole culture change concept and with Melo in tow, Phil now has the space to build a line-up that suits his franchise player.

The big fear here is how Phil does with FA's...but I'm willing to wait for him to screw that up before I dog him and I prefer this route to the alternative which was keeping JR in order to net a late first. It's similar to how I feel with the Tyson deal. I don't believe there was much value there and I'm content with a move that gives us more options even if it doesn't net us immediate gratification like a first rounder might.


I hope PJ doesn't feel too much pressure to spend it all in one place. If the right players are willing to come, by all means, but if not...

Depending on who is available, the Knicks can leverage their position into next year with trades. That way, when a Rondo type player becomes available, the Knicks will have the assets to make the acquisition without relinquishing a ton of value.


when you trade assets to create cap space, have a 31 year old max player, work for James Dolan, and don't own your 2016 1st round pick your under pressure to spend money.
NOOB77
General Manager
Posts: 9,165
And1: 3,288
Joined: Aug 17, 2007
   

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1402 » by NOOB77 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:03 pm

Fat Kat wrote:Some of the names available. Who ya want?

Bigs

LaMarcus Aldridge
Marc Gasol
DeAndre Jordan
Greg Monroe
Paul Millsap
Omer Asik
Robin Lopez
Amir Johnson
Brandon Bass
Tobias Harris (R)


Guards

Kawhi Leonard
Goran Dragic - said he will opt out
Wes Matthews
Rajon Rondo
Reggie Jackson (R)
Jimmy Butler (R)
Brandon Knight
Arron Afflalo
Wesley Matthews
Danny Green
Gerald Green
Marco Belinelli
Mike Dunleavy
Jeremy Lin :D


Don't know if Thad young or Patrick Beverly are opting out.
There are a few more names, but I'm wondering where and how you guys want to spend our money this offseason, and what can we realistically expect



Who I want depends on what pick we end up with and who we are taking with that pick.....

Okafor, Towns, Turner are all bigs I like in this draft of course the first two before the last....
Or Mudiay???

Depending on who we draft is where we will focus our needs in FA.

Say we draft Mudiay we will be looking at 2 bigs....
If we draft big we will be looking at a big and a wing player.
User avatar
swisscheeseD
NCAA Bracket Challenge Champion
Posts: 9,248
And1: 4,239
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Location: Tonight's The Night
     

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1403 » by swisscheeseD » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:03 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
Bklyn&company wrote:Some of you are the worse... you all complain about every damn thing... want this and that... with you all Phil is damned if he does or if he doesn't..

Don't you all see its time for a change? Does it even matter what the hell we got? Did you all really want both JR and Shump around? Players that are not getting better, don't play defense and that have hit their ceilings.

This move was made to maximize Phil option to providing him the opportunity to make immediate change.

Now I just hope Wall kills Jose (which is going to happen) and realize Jose, though a good vet to have around is not really a starting point guard anymore. Could be a 2 or 6th man.. but we need total change in our backcourt...


It is time for a change. It's time to stop taking on long term contracts like Jose Calderon. It's time to turn assets, like Tyson Chandler and Iman Shumpert, into 1st rd picks. It's time to stop putting all the eggs in one basket. Yes, it's time for change.


The time to trade Tyson Chandler and Iman Shumpert for anything of significant value was not this season/offseason, it was last (during Grunwald's tenure). That's when these guys actually had some value.

I'm not going to rush to judgment on Phil until this offseason as he is now free to put his stamp on the team with no restraints from the cap. I can't fault him for simply wanting to clean up what he believes to be our mess.

Grunwald was the one who failed to capitalize on his assets. I feel that Shump has regressed so much, but still had enough value to shed JR's potential opt-in, so he used a guy who he deemed part of the mess in Shump AS an asset to rid himself of JR.

He's doing this without giving up picks...and actually getting some back, even though they're only 2nd rounders.
Chicago Bulls

PG: Kemba Walker / T.Rozier / B.Wannamaker
SG: Donte DiVincenzo / T.Ross / P.Connaughton
SF: Kawhi Leonard / R.O’Neale / Caleb Martin
PF: Draymond Green / B.Portis / A.Aminu
C: Jonas Valanciunas / M.Harrell / F.Kaminsky
User avatar
E86
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,140
And1: 1,184
Joined: Jul 30, 2004

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1404 » by E86 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:04 pm

god shammgod wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
it's not about the trade, it's about the whole plan. once i saw how bad we were, i knew we were in trouble. and yeah, we will regret attaching jr to shump and felton to tyson because we could have got assets for them. our timing is always off. look at cleveland. you don't think they would give you a 1st round pick for tyson right now ? tyson chandler is everything they need. you could get more probably.


with what salaries. Tyson was making almost 15 million dollars. The cavs wouldn't have the salaries to match that trade. Most teams wouldn't because teams that are good that would be interested in Tyson wouldn't have the salaries to match that contract.

that is what people are missing. Trades are difficult to make. Not only do they have to make sense for both teams, they have to work financially. Where is the computer when we need him.

Cavs are interested in guys like Mosgov or Koufos. Cheap guys they can swap a first and haywood for or something like that.


we just sent out 9 mill and got nothing back. you get a 3rd team involved like what just happened.


That salary has to go some where, though. Tyson trade was twice the salary of this trade.
User avatar
evevale
Head Coach
Posts: 6,062
And1: 18,496
Joined: Dec 06, 2010
Location: the internet
 

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1405 » by evevale » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:04 pm

I haven't watched a Knicks game all season and thankfully so. But after reading about this trade earlier today I can do nothing but shake my head. The Phil Jackson era honestly couldn't start any **** worse.
Image
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,946
And1: 6,003
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1406 » by R-DAWG » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:04 pm

Capn'O wrote:
j4remi wrote:
PMFJB wrote:That link is from 2008. So I am going to play devil's advocate. We have 5 more years of drafts since then which have provided the following in the top 4:
2009 Thabeet, Tyreke Evans
2010 Evan Turner, Wesley Johnson
2011 Derrick Williams, Enes Kanter
2012 MKG, Waiters
2013 Bennett, Porter, Zeller

If we end up with the equivalent of any of those players with our pick I am going to be upset.

So if we fail with our pick (possible) then our whole plan is get everyone and anyone in free agency. That never works out. Ever.

We need to get more assets and not just give away players for cap space. If he would have received a late 1st rounder I would be happy. But to just give away players for 6 million more doesn't sit too well for me.


It's definitely a valid concern, but bare in mind that the top 3 prospects this year are close to can't miss status. So the odds are in our favor on this one whereas some of the guys above were in weak classes or blatant reaches.

As for just giving away Shump, we got rid of JR with him which replaces the return of a first but it equates to about 11 million in cap space which is enough to sign a player with an impact rating above those of typical late picks. The other thing is that if we made it through the deadline without finding a first for Shump, we'd be looking at giving him up for nothing. The time to deal him for a pick was last year before Phil came on (though you could blame him if you think his advisory role was key to that not happening which is a possibility) but at this point...between his lack of improvement, yearly injury time and RFA status, his value was probably less than anyone would like to think. It's not a home run move, but it fits with the whole culture change concept and with Melo in tow, Phil now has the space to build a line-up that suits his franchise player.

The big fear here is how Phil does with FA's...but I'm willing to wait for him to screw that up before I dog him and I prefer this route to the alternative which was keeping JR in order to net a late first. It's similar to how I feel with the Tyson deal. I don't believe there was much value there and I'm content with a move that gives us more options even if it doesn't net us immediate gratification like a first rounder might.


I hope PJ doesn't feel too much pressure to spend it all in one place. If the right players are willing to come, by all means, but if not...

Depending on who is available, the Knicks can leverage their position into next year with trades. That way, when a Rondo type player becomes available, the Knicks will have the assets to make the acquisition without relinquishing a ton of value.


What assets?
PMFJB
Banned User
Posts: 1,736
And1: 647
Joined: Aug 21, 2014

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1407 » by PMFJB » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:04 pm

Capn'O wrote:
j4remi wrote:
PMFJB wrote:That link is from 2008. So I am going to play devil's advocate. We have 5 more years of drafts since then which have provided the following in the top 4:
2009 Thabeet, Tyreke Evans
2010 Evan Turner, Wesley Johnson
2011 Derrick Williams, Enes Kanter
2012 MKG, Waiters
2013 Bennett, Porter, Zeller

If we end up with the equivalent of any of those players with our pick I am going to be upset.

So if we fail with our pick (possible) then our whole plan is get everyone and anyone in free agency. That never works out. Ever.

We need to get more assets and not just give away players for cap space. If he would have received a late 1st rounder I would be happy. But to just give away players for 6 million more doesn't sit too well for me.


It's definitely a valid concern, but bare in mind that the top 3 prospects this year are close to can't miss status. So the odds are in our favor on this one whereas some of the guys above were in weak classes or blatant reaches.

As for just giving away Shump, we got rid of JR with him which replaces the return of a first but it equates to about 11 million in cap space which is enough to sign a player with an impact rating above those of typical late picks. The other thing is that if we made it through the deadline without finding a first for Shump, we'd be looking at giving him up for nothing. The time to deal him for a pick was last year before Phil came on (though you could blame him if you think his advisory role was key to that not happening which is a possibility) but at this point...between his lack of improvement, yearly injury time and RFA status, his value was probably less than anyone would like to think. It's not a home run move, but it fits with the whole culture change concept and with Melo in tow, Phil now has the space to build a line-up that suits his franchise player.

The big fear here is how Phil does with FA's...but I'm willing to wait for him to screw that up before I dog him and I prefer this route to the alternative which was keeping JR in order to net a late first. It's similar to how I feel with the Tyson deal. I don't believe there was much value there and I'm content with a move that gives us more options even if it doesn't net us immediate gratification like a first rounder might.


I hope PJ doesn't feel too much pressure to spend it all in one place. If the right players are willing to come, by all means, but if not...

Depending on who is available, the Knicks can leverage their position into next year with trades. That way, when a Rondo type player becomes available, the Knicks will have the assets to make the acquisition without relinquishing a ton of value.

But that is my biggest fear that he does feel obligate to spend.

He promised Melo he would build a contender. He promised Dolan. If LMA/Gasol/Dragic all say no. Do we go all in on Milsap and Matthews and essentially gave up a season to get those guys because of the promises he made?

And if he doesn't get anyone and stand pat and we are terrible agian next year with NO PICK. What happens then?

All his moves scream, free agency or bust. Not thrilled with that.
User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,099
And1: 11,028
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1408 » by NoLayupRule » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:04 pm

PMFJB wrote:The one positive about this whole trade is that we finally get to do what I said we should at the beginning of the season which is develop our young talent even at the expense of wins. Again you dummies cried and complained about it when I said it back in October but now are all happy about it. Lesson of the day. I am always right.

wow - way to come off as a total douche
User avatar
omerome
RealGM
Posts: 16,570
And1: 8,831
Joined: Aug 22, 2004
Location: Maryland (via Brooklyn)

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1409 » by omerome » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:04 pm

PMFJB wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
it's not about the trade, it's about the whole plan. once i saw how bad we were, i knew we were in trouble. and yeah, we will regret attaching jr to shump and felton to tyson because we could have got assets for them. our timing is always off. look at cleveland. you don't think they would give you a 1st round pick for tyson right now ? tyson chandler is everything they need. you could get more probably.


with what salaries. Tyson was making almost 15 million dollars. The cavs wouldn't have the salaries to match that trade. Most teams wouldn't because teams that are good that would be interested in Tyson wouldn't have the salaries to match that contract.

that is what people are missing. Trades are difficult to make. Not only do they have to make sense for both teams, they have to work financially. Where is the computer when we need him.

Cavs are interested in guys like Mosgov or Koufos. Cheap guys they can swap a first and haywood for or something like that.

It didn't need to be to Cleveland. Look at what Morey got for Asik. A possible lottery pick. His contract was the same for Tyson.

I agree with mr negative that we are just giving away players that have value just to get as much cap space as possible. But there are not real game changers other than LMA and maybe Gasol. If we strike out on both (which seem probable) then we gave up value for nothing.

You don't put all your eggs in the free agent basket. That is what Walsh did and it set us back 5 years.

No, what set us back 5 years was settling. We signed Amar'e long term instead of just building the team or using the cap space to build assets. We tried to think that Amar'e's injury history was behind him and that was a mistake.
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,946
And1: 6,003
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1410 » by R-DAWG » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:05 pm

ORANGEandBLUE wrote:
god shammgod wrote:we just sent out 9 mill and got nothing back. you get a 3rd team involved like what just happened.

It's really simple... they had the salaries to absorb $9m. They did not have the salaries to absorb $14m. Nobody was taking Varejao and they want to keep TT cause he has the same agent as Lebron.


Vareajo was expiring at the time, why wouldn't we take him?
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,241
And1: 55,144
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1411 » by Deeeez Knicks » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:05 pm

j4remi wrote:I think everyone should just be quiet about what Phil's plan was...yesterday I was hearing that JR and Shump would be here next year because that was Phil's plan...but the cats that were saying Shump moving was inevitable are team hoodwinked this morning.


:lol: :lol:

+ infinity
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
ORANGEandBLUE
RealGM
Posts: 16,144
And1: 1,334
Joined: May 06, 2001

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1412 » by ORANGEandBLUE » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:06 pm

PMFJB wrote:Phil said we were aiming for the playoffs. That ECF would be a good ceiling for this team.

Look up the espn article everyone was praising where he gave his fair assessment of everyone in the team and then said that about his expectations for the team.

So basically you're assuming that every vague platitude that Phil utters to the press is 100% indicative of his actual plans for the team.

And the idea of espn articles, I just don't get it... now our goal has to be living up to the expectations espn sets for us?
ORANGEandBLUE
RealGM
Posts: 16,144
And1: 1,334
Joined: May 06, 2001

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1413 » by ORANGEandBLUE » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:07 pm

Deeeez Knicks wrote:
j4remi wrote:I think everyone should just be quiet about what Phil's plan was...yesterday I was hearing that JR and Shump would be here next year because that was Phil's plan...but the cats that were saying Shump moving was inevitable are team hoodwinked this morning.


:lol: :lol:

+ infinity

Seems to me like the people who have always been against tanking assume that Phil's plan couldn't possibly have been to tank.
PMFJB
Banned User
Posts: 1,736
And1: 647
Joined: Aug 21, 2014

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1414 » by PMFJB » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:07 pm

omerome wrote:
PMFJB wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:with what salaries. Tyson was making almost 15 million dollars. The cavs wouldn't have the salaries to match that trade. Most teams wouldn't because teams that are good that would be interested in Tyson wouldn't have the salaries to match that contract.

that is what people are missing. Trades are difficult to make. Not only do they have to make sense for both teams, they have to work financially. Where is the computer when we need him.

Cavs are interested in guys like Mosgov or Koufos. Cheap guys they can swap a first and haywood for or something like that.

It didn't need to be to Cleveland. Look at what Morey got for Asik. A possible lottery pick. His contract was the same for Tyson.

I agree with mr negative that we are just giving away players that have value just to get as much cap space as possible. But there are not real game changers other than LMA and maybe Gasol. If we strike out on both (which seem probable) then we gave up value for nothing.

You don't put all your eggs in the free agent basket. That is what Walsh did and it set us back 5 years.

No, what set us back 5 years was settling. We signed Amar'e long term instead of just building the team or using the cap space to build assets. We tried to think that Amar'e's injury history was behind him and that was a mistake.

Hmm that is exactly what I meant.
User avatar
MKCATL
Starter
Posts: 2,337
And1: 707
Joined: Feb 10, 2004

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1415 » by MKCATL » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:08 pm

bigfnjoe96 wrote:We are in such a better position today then we were yesterday, it's not even funny, and we still ain't done dealing. Trust me



Woj also mentioned, Phil might take on a 2year contract, but for the most part he wants to keep the books clean. So I guess we could trade Amare for a worse contract to obtain a pick or asset.
"I am by no means an expert in basketball." -James Dolan
ORANGEandBLUE
RealGM
Posts: 16,144
And1: 1,334
Joined: May 06, 2001

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1416 » by ORANGEandBLUE » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:08 pm

R-DAWG wrote:Vareajo was expiring at the time, why wouldn't we take him?

His example was us relying on Cleveland's desperation, which did not arise until AFTER they re-signed AV and AFTER he got injured once again. Cleveland clearly valued him higher than just a throw-in at the point at which he was an expiring.
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,328
And1: 116,068
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1417 » by mpharris36 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:08 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
value wise, both Shumpert and Waiters are struggling young players. NY would have to wait until Shump got healthy to do the deal. Furthermore, CLE needed a defensive wing and Waiters didn't fit into their culture. They wanted Shumpert.

CLE fans on the trade board were willing to move the MEM 1st for Shumpert.


:lol: ok so a few people on a message board might be interested and you think the front office would be?

waiters and shumpert don't have the same value and you are kidding yourself if you think they do. One guy can't go anywhere next year the other guy can price himself out of his current team with a RFA offer sheet.

shumpert is also injured and playing terrible. They don't have comparable value.
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 137,890
And1: 136,216
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1418 » by god shammgod » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:09 pm

i said that was phil's plan before the season. once it went to sh*t he decided to adjust i guess.

you know what though, i hope for the best. i don't care about being right or wrong or anything. i just want the knicks to be good. i just don't feel great about all of this.
User avatar
sol537
RealGM
Posts: 15,323
And1: 7,869
Joined: Nov 07, 2001

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1419 » by sol537 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:09 pm

next up... package THJr to move Calderon and get back a late 1st or a 2nd. That would put as at two max slots, basically.

Lebron and Marc. or Aldridge. or Milsap. To go along with our lotto pick.... *drools*
BowlRips
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,691
And1: 2,934
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
     

Re: Cavs/Knicks/OKC in 3 Way Trade Talks (JR+SHUMP TRADED TO CLE) 

Post#1420 » by BowlRips » Tue Jan 6, 2015 4:09 pm

whats funny here is that everyone was dying for JR to be traded.
Everyone had all these offseason lineups. None including JR and Shump.
Phil makes the moves to make those offseason lineups a reality and you all blast him.
JR Had to be move. The price to pay was Shumpert. Shumpert was not in his plans especially at a $6mil cap hold.
We did the right thing

Return to New York Knicks