SOUL wrote:Ever since Robin left mph started winning

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
SOUL wrote:Ever since Robin left mph started winning
Strick wrote:SOUL wrote:Ever since Robin left mph started winning
mpharris36 wrote:Strick wrote:SOUL wrote:Ever since Robin left mph started winning
I love that this is the most memorable BAF gif.
SOUL wrote:has anyone else been scouting prospects? y'all narrowing down any choices yet?
mpharris36 wrote:that team page....
Capn'O wrote:mpharris36 wrote:that team page....
I don't love mine yet.
bishnykfan wrote:Spoiler:
As always, this vote needs a majority of GM's to vote yes to pass. 16 yes votes will pass this proposal. Please send in your vote, via PM, before the deadline, which will be midnight on Monday night.
mpharris36 wrote:bishnykfan wrote:Spoiler:
As always, this vote needs a majority of GM's to vote yes to pass. 16 yes votes will pass this proposal. Please send in your vote, via PM, before the deadline, which will be midnight on Monday night.
Spurs Vote No for the rule change.
I think its a solid rule but the verbiage of "newer GM's can be grandfathered into the rule" I don't like. Where is the cut off? How new do you have to be. If you have been in the league for 1 or 2 years now I don't think that should be applicable.
I do like the idea of potentially giving a brand new GM an amnesty clause just in case a roster they are taking over is just so bad (and someone leaves because of it) we don't have a ton of interest in it in the future for that team. But I have to vote no as Bish has stated you have to vote for the rule as is. I don't like the "grandfathered part for newer GM's".
I would be ok with the drafter of this rule proposing this in the future with the tweak that "newer GM's are grandfathered" is removed. It should just be brand new GM's and they should have to make there call on a contract in the start of that first offseason.
Capn'O wrote:mpharris36 wrote:bishnykfan wrote:Spoiler:
As always, this vote needs a majority of GM's to vote yes to pass. 16 yes votes will pass this proposal. Please send in your vote, via PM, before the deadline, which will be midnight on Monday night.
Spurs Vote No for the rule change.
I think its a solid rule but the verbiage of "newer GM's can be grandfathered into the rule" I don't like. Where is the cut off? How new do you have to be. If you have been in the league for 1 or 2 years now I don't think that should be applicable.
I do like the idea of potentially giving a brand new GM an amnesty clause just in case a roster they are taking over is just so bad (and someone leaves because of it) we don't have a ton of interest in it in the future for that team. But I have to vote no as Bish has stated you have to vote for the rule as is. I don't like the "grandfathered part for newer GM's".
I would be ok with the drafter of this rule proposing this in the future with the tweak that "newer GM's are grandfathered" is removed. It should just be brand new GM's and they should have to make there call on a contract in the start of that first offseason.
I echo these thoughts. I would support an amended rule but not this one.
HEZI wrote:I think the rule is fine. How many GMs that took over teams in the last year or more are still stuck with a contract they inherited? I think none. So at this moment this would really only apply to BB anyway