ImageImageImageImageImage

Hot Topic - Quite Frankly; All Things Frank

Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks

What should the Knicks approach be with Frank

Try to develop until prime years (~26) - essentially hold until it's 100% clear what he is
45
30%
Hold and try to develop until the end of rookie contract
64
43%
Hold until season's end/middle of next season to make a decision
13
9%
Look to trade him now for assets and/or a salary dump
23
15%
Other
5
3%
 
Total votes: 150

User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,766
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1461 » by Phish Tank » Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:52 pm

taj2133 wrote:I need to see frank improve and let his game do the talking because i need to see some drastic improvement the next 25 games.


do you work for the Knicks?
Image
cuyankees
Veteran
Posts: 2,534
And1: 1,274
Joined: Feb 15, 2014

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1462 » by cuyankees » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:04 pm

KnixinSix wrote:
Dantares wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
So long as we remain in the bottom 4, we each get a 14% chance, right?


True. I don't think we are at risk of falling out of the top four. But 1 seed is a guarantee of a top 5 pick.


Thenewlotteryoddsarewhack

Even with worst record you have a 48 percent chance of picking 5

This narrative is constantly repeated and borderline fear mongering.

What if I told you w the old odds worst team had 37% chance to pick 4th instead of 48% to pick 5th?

So instead of 1:2, 1:3

Much more things to worry about
taj2133
General Manager
Posts: 7,504
And1: 2,972
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1463 » by taj2133 » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:36 pm

Phish Tank wrote:
taj2133 wrote:I need to see frank improve and let his game do the talking because i need to see some drastic improvement the next 25 games.


do you work for the Knicks?

As fan i need to see drastic improve because he hasn't done anything on the offensive side ball, i need to see his game do talking instead of frank talking about.
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,789
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1464 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:38 pm

So what if you have a 47.9% chance at the 5th pick?

Would you prefer to have a 27.8% chance at the 5th pick and a 20% chance at the 6th pick??

This is a no brainer.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,617
And1: 30,815
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1465 » by Jeff Van Gully » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:44 pm

K-DOT wrote:I'd rather have both tbh

Only problem I have with the concept of a DSJ/Frank backcourt is that DSJ isn't big enough to switch onto 2s consistently, which does limit our defensive potential, but it is what it is. Stylistically, they can compliment each other well enough, especially given what I've seen of DSJ's willingness to move the ball. Plus, they seem like good friends off the court, so maybe we get some of that chemistry to translate on court.

Just have to get them to work on getting some consistency with their jump shots, but they're like 20, I'm not that impatient. I'll keep saying it until we end up getting rid of one or both of them, but they have the potential to be a better version of the Kemba/Batum backcourt


i want them to OD rub off on each other. pause.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,617
And1: 30,815
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1466 » by Jeff Van Gully » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:45 pm

BasicBall wrote:If Knicks do get that number 1 overall pick, I ain’t too sure I’d trade it for AD....I’d damn sure trade anything other than that number 1 for AD.

But I really don’t think I’d trade Zion for AD!! That kid is special!!

And for the record I’m kinda excited about seeing a backcourt of Frank and DSJ cause I ain’t too keen on Kyrie either. I’d take KD & Kawhi first actually.


NO isn't even listening if the #1 overall isn't in there.

shoot. i'd give them 5 firsts if we could keep #1 overall. :lol:
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,766
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1467 » by Phish Tank » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:53 pm

taj2133 wrote:
Phish Tank wrote:
taj2133 wrote:I need to see frank improve and let his game do the talking because i need to see some drastic improvement the next 25 games.


do you work for the Knicks?

As fan i need to see drastic improve because he hasn't done anything on the offensive side ball, i need to see his game do talking instead of frank talking about.


are you a computer?
Image
User avatar
Strick
Head Coach
Posts: 6,392
And1: 9,637
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1468 » by Strick » Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:48 pm

dakomish23 wrote:So what if you have a 47.9% chance at the 5th pick?

Would you prefer to have a 27.8% chance at the 5th pick and a 20% chance at the 6th pick??

This is a no brainer.

Both the same percentages (well, .1% off) of falling out of the top 4. Actually 1st-3rd worst have the same odds to pick 1-4 and have basically a 47.9% chance (47.8% for 2nd and 3rd worst) for falling out of the top 4. The odds honestly look better for teams picking 2nd or even third because that 47.8 is spread out (between 5th and 6th for 2nd worst and between 5th 6th and 7th for the worst record.

Just looking at it percentage wise 1st jumps off immediately as being very sketchy with almost a 50% chance at 5. The thing is that they all have equal chances of falling out of the top 5, there's are just spread out more, BUT only being able to drop to 5 maximum is big too. I could honestly understand an argument for either side
RGM Knicks BAF- Minnesota Timberwolves
Image

PG: LaMelo|Reaves|Clayton Jr
SG: B Miller|Herb|McCain
SF: Jalen J|Middleton|Tyson and Clifford
PF: Paolo|Reed
C: SenGOON|Cling Kong
shtolky
Head Coach
Posts: 6,160
And1: 4,729
Joined: Apr 15, 2005

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1469 » by shtolky » Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:08 pm

Strick wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:So what if you have a 47.9% chance at the 5th pick?

Would you prefer to have a 27.8% chance at the 5th pick and a 20% chance at the 6th pick??

This is a no brainer.

Both the same percentages (well, .1% off) of falling out of the top 4. Actually 1st-3rd worst have the same odds to pick 1-4 and have basically a 47.9% chance (47.8% for 2nd and 3rd worst) for falling out of the top 4. The odds honestly look better for teams picking 2nd or even third because that 47.8 is spread out (between 5th and 6th for 2nd worst and between 5th 6th and 7th for the worst record.

Just looking at it percentage wise 1st jumps off immediately as being very sketchy with almost a 50% chance at 5. The thing is that they all have equal chances of falling out of the top 5, there's are just spread out more, BUT only being able to drop to 5 maximum is big too. I could honestly understand an argument for either side



The only thing that matters is that the worst record cannot go below the 5th pick. Top 3 teams have the same chance at a top 4 pick (52% chance), but you absolutely want to be the worst team so you guarantee a top 5 pick. Each slot you drop in the standings can also drop you in the draft. The bottom 3 teams have a 52% chance at a top 4 pick. The 48% is spread out the lower you are in the standings. 2nd worst record can pick 6th (48% chance of 5/6), 3rd worst 7th (48% chance 5/6/7), 4th worst 8th (48% chance 5/6/7/8). There is no argument for both sides.
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,865
And1: 25,163
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1470 » by E-Balla » Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:14 pm

KnicksChamps wrote:How can you not root for the kid? He’s young and he’s working hard to be a great player and teammate. What more do you want?

For him to compete. Being a great teammate and person is cool, but you need a mean streak to be great.
1999
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 407
Joined: Apr 25, 2012

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1471 » by 1999 » Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:16 pm

E-Balla wrote:
KnicksChamps wrote:How can you not root for the kid? He’s young and he’s working hard to be a great player and teammate. What more do you want?

For him to compete. Being a great teammate and person is cool, but you need a mean streak to be great.


Not even just a mean streak but at the very least act like you want it. Fiz could decide he wants to play Kadeem Allen over Frank tomorrow and he’ll just go with the flow. Fans can’t want it more than he does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
drekwins
Head Coach
Posts: 7,288
And1: 4,692
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1472 » by drekwins » Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:18 pm

I think that the number 2 and 3 picks have a lot of value in this draft. I think that there's a big drop off after three though.
User avatar
Strick
Head Coach
Posts: 6,392
And1: 9,637
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1473 » by Strick » Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:19 pm

shtolky wrote:
Strick wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:So what if you have a 47.9% chance at the 5th pick?

Would you prefer to have a 27.8% chance at the 5th pick and a 20% chance at the 6th pick??

This is a no brainer.

Both the same percentages (well, .1% off) of falling out of the top 4. Actually 1st-3rd worst have the same odds to pick 1-4 and have basically a 47.9% chance (47.8% for 2nd and 3rd worst) for falling out of the top 4. The odds honestly look better for teams picking 2nd or even third because that 47.8 is spread out (between 5th and 6th for 2nd worst and between 5th 6th and 7th for the worst record.

Just looking at it percentage wise 1st jumps off immediately as being very sketchy with almost a 50% chance at 5. The thing is that they all have equal chances of falling out of the top 5, there's are just spread out more, BUT only being able to drop to 5 maximum is big too. I could honestly understand an argument for either side



The only thing that matters is that the worst record cannot go below the 5th pick. Top 3 teams have the same chance at a top 4 pick (52% chance), but you absolutely want to be the worst team so you guarantee a top 5 pick. Each slot you drop in the standings can also drop you in the draft. The bottom 3 teams have a 52% chance at a top 4 pick. The 48% is spread out the lower you are in the standings. 2nd worst record can pick 6th (48% chance of 5/6), 3rd worst 7th (48% chance 5/6/7), 4th worst 8th (48% chance 5/6/7/8). There is no argument for both sides.

Exactly. While just looking at percentages 2 or 3 looks more appealing off first glance, but they can drop to 6 or 7 respectively. Get the worst record and pray things go your way. Guaranteed a top 5 pick and no one else would be able to say that
RGM Knicks BAF- Minnesota Timberwolves
Image

PG: LaMelo|Reaves|Clayton Jr
SG: B Miller|Herb|McCain
SF: Jalen J|Middleton|Tyson and Clifford
PF: Paolo|Reed
C: SenGOON|Cling Kong
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,789
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1474 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:24 pm

Strick wrote:
shtolky wrote:
Strick wrote:Both the same percentages (well, .1% off) of falling out of the top 4. Actually 1st-3rd worst have the same odds to pick 1-4 and have basically a 47.9% chance (47.8% for 2nd and 3rd worst) for falling out of the top 4. The odds honestly look better for teams picking 2nd or even third because that 47.8 is spread out (between 5th and 6th for 2nd worst and between 5th 6th and 7th for the worst record.

Just looking at it percentage wise 1st jumps off immediately as being very sketchy with almost a 50% chance at 5. The thing is that they all have equal chances of falling out of the top 5, there's are just spread out more, BUT only being able to drop to 5 maximum is big too. I could honestly understand an argument for either side



The only thing that matters is that the worst record cannot go below the 5th pick. Top 3 teams have the same chance at a top 4 pick (52% chance), but you absolutely want to be the worst team so you guarantee a top 5 pick. Each slot you drop in the standings can also drop you in the draft. The bottom 3 teams have a 52% chance at a top 4 pick. The 48% is spread out the lower you are in the standings. 2nd worst record can pick 6th (48% chance of 5/6), 3rd worst 7th (48% chance 5/6/7), 4th worst 8th (48% chance 5/6/7/8). There is no argument for both sides.

Exactly. While just looking at percentages 2 or 3 looks more appealing off first glance, but they can drop to 6 or 7 respectively. Get the worst record and pray things go your way. Guaranteed a top 5 pick and no one else would be able to say that


Yeah. Isn’t this what I said? Confused.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
Strick
Head Coach
Posts: 6,392
And1: 9,637
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1475 » by Strick » Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:41 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
Strick wrote:
shtolky wrote:

The only thing that matters is that the worst record cannot go below the 5th pick. Top 3 teams have the same chance at a top 4 pick (52% chance), but you absolutely want to be the worst team so you guarantee a top 5 pick. Each slot you drop in the standings can also drop you in the draft. The bottom 3 teams have a 52% chance at a top 4 pick. The 48% is spread out the lower you are in the standings. 2nd worst record can pick 6th (48% chance of 5/6), 3rd worst 7th (48% chance 5/6/7), 4th worst 8th (48% chance 5/6/7/8). There is no argument for both sides.

Exactly. While just looking at percentages 2 or 3 looks more appealing off first glance, but they can drop to 6 or 7 respectively. Get the worst record and pray things go your way. Guaranteed a top 5 pick and no one else would be able to say that


Yeah. Isn’t this what I said? Confused.

You may have lol. I just caught your post saying the percentage for the worst record to pick 5th vs to odds the 2nd worst picks 5th or 6th. Asking which would you prefer and it is pretty simple.

I guess I should have gone back a page to see if things have been disgusted further before or anything. I figured it was just a prompted question so I wanted to kinda explain it as full as I could since it is kind of a **** show with this new lottery. My bad :lol:
RGM Knicks BAF- Minnesota Timberwolves
Image

PG: LaMelo|Reaves|Clayton Jr
SG: B Miller|Herb|McCain
SF: Jalen J|Middleton|Tyson and Clifford
PF: Paolo|Reed
C: SenGOON|Cling Kong
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 18,418
And1: 16,598
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A magical land of rainbows and cotton candy trees where the Knicks D gonna F you up
   

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1476 » by BKlutch » Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:11 pm

If we enter the lottery with the worst record, we feel bad because we have only a 14% chance of winning and figure another team will get 1st pick.

If we drop below the worst record to second or third worst, we worry that the team with the worst record will get the highest pick.

We worry both ways, and we're not happy. What a revoltin' turn of events.
.

____________________
____________________


:basketball: _______ M U C K A_________ :basketball:
*Make Us Champion Knicks Again*
:basketball: ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** :basketball:
____________________
____________________

.
.
cuyankees
Veteran
Posts: 2,534
And1: 1,274
Joined: Feb 15, 2014

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1477 » by cuyankees » Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:21 pm

This whole draft lottery % fear mongering and the other idiotic idea to shoot for 3rd worst vs worst was started and echoed by some "smart" mods who will remain nameless and it's snowballed into a rebuttal for any + çomment about upcoming draft.

It was idiotic when it had been originally proclaimed, it still is and the mere fact that it's continued to be echoed is even worse.

Want the best odds @ the your team getting the best pick in the draft then go for the worst possible record. Not 3rd, 2nd etc. It gives you best odds for the top 5 pick relative to every team in the league.

Yes there's a 48% chance you pick 5th and last year PHX had a 37% chance to pick 4th.
User avatar
rajajackal
General Manager
Posts: 7,700
And1: 9,866
Joined: Nov 04, 2013

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1478 » by rajajackal » Mon Feb 11, 2019 10:37 pm

i watched the dallas game at MSG the night before kp was traded to them. my girlfriend very kindly decided she wanted to buy me a jersey at the gift shop. she asks me if i wanted porzingis since i'm always talking about him, but i was like nah i **** with frank ntilikina harder

:]
matchman
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,846
And1: 3,412
Joined: Oct 20, 2003
Location: Hong Kong
 

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1479 » by matchman » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:03 pm

rajajackal wrote:i watched the dallas game at MSG the night before kp was traded to them. my girlfriend very kindly decided she wanted to buy me a jersey at the gift shop. she asks me if i wanted porzingis since i'm always talking about him, but i was like nah i **** with frank ntilikina harder

:]

Smart choice.
Are you fans of the team or the player?
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,617
And1: 30,815
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: [Article] Frank speaks on our new backcourt 

Post#1480 » by Jeff Van Gully » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:57 pm

matchman wrote:
rajajackal wrote:i watched the dallas game at MSG the night before kp was traded to them. my girlfriend very kindly decided she wanted to buy me a jersey at the gift shop. she asks me if i wanted porzingis since i'm always talking about him, but i was like nah i **** with frank ntilikina harder

:]

Smart choice.


i have never seen a frank ntilikina jersey anywhere other than on frank ntilikina.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale

Return to New York Knicks