JBreezeNY wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:Cant even hate this s**** looks nice.
Wish my knicks would do cool things like this.
Been saying this for a while, the Nets are a far more creative and fresher brand than the Knicks.
The Knicks branding department is a f****** mess and the franchise is stuck in the mid 2000s in the way it represents itself.
The Nets have better looking jerseys and better looking court designs. They even paid homage to Biggie last year. How dope is that? And where are the Knicks in all this? Still stuck on that blue and orange identity as if it didn't leave room for any other concepts and ideas. We're like a old dinosaur out there.
Screw the Nets all the way but they have a better brand right now, that's the bottom line. The Knicks really need to get with the times and replace some folks in that department.
I said it before when some of the new Knicks were embracing Knickstape, we don’t have an identity & honestly we look outdated. We don’t really play hip hop, we’re focused on appealing to the older generation, we play up to the “franchise history” when clearly that’s all we have to offer, our history. It would be like the bulls continuing to play up the Jordan years, Jordan ain’t walking thru that door, neither is Ewing, Oakley or Stark. Where is our iconic theme song? We still play the one from ‘94, we need something that represents us. Our jerseys aren’t creative, our court is whatever, we don’t take many risks on a creative side and it sucks. I **** on the Nets but between this & the Biggie homage I can see why KD/Kyrie would sign with them.
The Nyets are fully embracing the youth as far as design, music, appealing more to the youngins..then you have us with “tradition” & honestly the “tradition” comes off like how the Yankees move.
Now let me ask you, if you have two players who are in their primes, are in-tune with black culture, would Yankees tradition from a team that hasn’t really had a winning tradition in 20+ years appeal to you? Or would a team that looks from head to toe is moving with a younger feel from the music, doing creative things outside of basketball, appeal more?
I still sh*t on KD for the move but I can see why.
Let me put it this way. When Vince carter and Kidd left the Nets the fans left too, When KG, Peirce, and JJ left the fans left too, when Ewing left the Knicks the fans stayed, when Melo left the fans stayed. Yes we live off our history and culture - DMX, Rakim, Tribe, Heavy D, and so forth while Brooklyn has moved to a youth movement with Migos, 21 Savage, Tyga.
The problem though, through-out the NBA, is loyalty. Our youth these days don't have loyalty to a team, their loyal only to players, while Knick fans are actually loyal to the team. We sell out crowds just to see players like THJ dawn a blue and orange jersey. We are the most famous arena and our fans take over other stadiums when were in town even when our team sucks. Ain't nothing like going to a Hawks game to a sold out stadium with only a few red jerseys in the crowd, but everybody else is rocking blue.
This is why a lot of Laker fans did not want Lebron. They knew that if things didn't go his way he would skip on them in a second because he has no loyalty. They knew that he would bring nothing but bandwagon fans with him and here lies the Nets problem. There's no such thing as a Nets fan, well maybe 2-3, but the other 50 fans that come to their games are there only because Kyrie and Durant are wearing black and while.
It's always funny to me when you see someone wearing a Brooklyn hat and after asking them if they are fans they say "naw I just like the color!"
