newyorker4ever wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
NO. I've been outspoken today that I don't want Kyrie near this team.
I'm fine with signing KD.
I'm not fine with trading away picks and Mitch for AD.
I'm down with adding a max cat like KD and continuing to build, because if he has 4-5 years in the tank that is more than enough time to be in contention mid-way through his contract with a mix of signings, drafted players and good pick-ups (which this club is perfectly capable of executing now).
And, yes, I agree, we could just hold off one more season and keep our powder dry. I've waited this long, so I'm not on the spend or die bandwagon.
What about Kemba instead of Kyrie? Let's pretend that Durant doesn't have a Kyrie preference, but insists on a vet PG.
If Kyrie signs with Brooklyn then i'd like to know what people think about D.Russell running the point for us? We sure would be able to use his shooting and i think he could even play some SG if we wanted to play him with DSJ, Frank or K.Allen. We'd have two southpaws as our starting guards with Russell and Barrett.
PG--D.Russell
SG--RJ.Barrett
SF--K.Knox/K.Durant
PF--K.Durant/K.Knox
C---M.Robinson
Personally, I think it would be a mistake to tie up max money in D. Russell.
If the Knicks wanted to tie up max money in stupid, they could have not traded KP