moocow007 wrote:E-Balla wrote:moocow007 wrote:Shumpert isn't a can't miss asset. But he's a strong defender on an expiring contract. That is value.
Think about it. Why would a team with a better record want the 2 of them if they are such crap? Why would the Cavaliers want to take on a cancer and an injured dud? Why would they want to take a "guaranteed" extra year on Smith if they know that both James and Love can go elsewhere? Maybe...just maybe...they actually don't use their personal dislike of JR Smith (and Shumpert) to cloud their judgment? Why are we assuming that Phil Jackson, the GM (not head coach but GM) is better than the Cavs GM at...well...GM'ing?
They did this because it got rid of Dion and got them a first round pick. JR is a negative value guy and Shump is an expiring they can dump. It came down to how much they disliked Dion not how much they liked Shump.
Why would the Cavs who are trying to win now value a 1st round pick of the Thunder of all teams in the future? And if JR Smith is such a negative why would they want to replace Dion Waiters with him? JR Smith is a negative value right? The Cavs could have just bought a bottom of the barrel 1st round pick if they wanted to. They still have their $3 million allotment. Is the hair brained plan for them to buy another 1st round pick so they can have 2? And let's forget that the biggest problem with Waiters is his unwillingness to come off the bench which is something that JR Smith has done his entire career well. And we'll also forget that the Cavs biggest weakness is defending the perimeter which...oh...so...happens to be Shumpert's best (only) skill. But yep, the trade wasn't for Smith or Shumpert.

The Cavs could not have just bought a first rd pick, those picks don't sell for cash anymore. Additionally, they couldn't buy and trade a 1st rd pick in season.
The 1st round pick is an asset they can use in a trade. The pick + TPE could net them a Mozgov or Kufos in a trade potentially. The trade was for Shumpert because they needed a guy who could defend the perimeter and he was the best guy on the market. Smith might be an asset for them, might not. '
Getting that pick was the reason why CLE won this deal. Upgrades for the short term and long term.